User talk:Ufrsgonz/sandbox

Peer Review by Jailene
For an under represented artist, I believe you did a good job by adding her most notable lines of work and where she's located in. I believe the next steps you should take is breaking the page down into sections. For example, now you can add subheadings like "Early life" "Career" any kinds of awards she may have won, her graphic novels, and even details about her personal life. Add information that you believe is important for someone to know when learning about her. You can also add on any other pages that may seem useful when referring back to her work. Ufbookworm (talk) 14:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review by Alyssa
I think you're off to a great start in terms of having a clear structure. It also looks like you're on track to have a balance between focusing on the artist's early life/career and influence/themes the artist focuses on. I like how the Vans and Thrasher projects are mentioned in the first paragraph, especially if these were major projects that brought her more notoriety. If they were notable projects for the artist, consider adding a subheading under "Early Life and Career" such as "Notable Works" to distinguish them from other career points in her life. Aprad17 (talk) 16:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Frankie's Peer Review
I liked your subheadings. I think once you add your information this will be a great page and I liked your start. I think you need to add more to that first sentence because I'm sure there's more information on her than that one sentence. The sentence is also a run on sentence so you should break it up more so it flows better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FDC 2 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)