User talk:Ufuncecu

Invite
Jccort (talk) 13:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks and Apologies
Thank you for your addition to the UF page. I'm truly sorry for how the whole issue was handled with the rankings and I apologize that, though I did just as much wrong as anyone else, you were the only one punished for the situation. I hope that we can work together in the future since we have a common goal of making this page, among others, better for everyone. Again, thank you for your help and my apologies for the way it all worked out. Fliry Vorru (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries, and let me add my apologies as well. I can get a little harsh when defending something I believe to be right, which doesn't generally win friends or influence people.  I'm sure that collaboration in the future will be much more civil, and I will certainly work toward that end.  Next time we hit an impasse, we can always just start bashing FSU, UGa, or LSU.  This will remind us that we are all Gators, and ultimately have the same goal.  By the way, the guy that denied my request to be unblocked was an Auburn Tiger.  Talk about salt in the wound.  Thanks again.Ufuncecu (talk) 04:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. &mdash; slakr \ talk / 21:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I have struck my previous comment, and offer my apologies. I was evaluating the publicly available WHOIS data, which indicated that your work IP address (as you identify it above, 66.192.81.164) was registered to a firm in Littleton, Colorado, as noted in this report. Given your statements, it seemed inconsistent, which was why I pointed it out.

With regard to Checkuser evidence; unfortunately, checkuser confirmation of sockpuppetry is usually sufficient for a block, and the use of the unblock template is not a means to question the validity of that checkuser confirmation; you must surely be aware of how many dozens of vandals do so everyday, to no avail. In this case, you followed the correct procedure - you e-mailed the checkuser directly, presenting your information in a private medium, and he properly reduced the block. The information available to typical users (and admins) is insufficient to judge the validity of your claims - as evidenced by I attempt to do so. That's why we have checkusers in the first place. So I apologize for my comments, as they did nothing but enflame the situation. My best to you, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 02:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

What does the number in parentheses represent?
On my "watchlist" page, there appears a positive or negative number in parentheses after the name of the article. It follows the format "Name of Article...(+5)...Name of Editor." What does the number in parentheses indicate? I have looked for an explanation, but cannot find one. Thanks! Ufuncecu (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The amount in bytes that was added or subtracted from a page. Killiondude (talk) 18:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)