User talk:Ugochimobi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sweet Sixteen Novel (February 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sweet Sixteen Novel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sweet Sixteen Novel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sweet_Sixteen_Novel Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CommanderWaterford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sweet_Sixteen_Novel reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Re administrator
Please do not claim that you are a Wikipedia administrator, which has a specific meaning and process to go through in order to become one. 331dot (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sweet Sixteen Novel (February 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sweet Sixteen Novel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sweet Sixteen Novel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sweet_Sixteen_Novel Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sweet_Sixteen_Novel reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sweet Sixteen Novel (February 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sweet Sixteen Novel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sweet Sixteen Novel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sweet_Sixteen_Novel Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HitroMilanese&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sweet_Sixteen_Novel reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Rosula Foundation moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rosula Foundation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Blablubbs | talk 22:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * You had previously disclosed a COI with "Prime 9ja Online Media" but later removed that claim. Could you explain why? Please also disclose any other conflicts of interest you may have. Thanks and best, Blablubbs | talk 22:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sweet Sixteen Novel


A tag has been placed on Sweet Sixteen Novel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/50221328-sweet-sixteen. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blablubbs | talk 22:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Rosula Foundation moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rosula Foundation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 13:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sweet Sixteen Novel


The article Sweet Sixteen Novel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Just barely avoids A7. Significant WP:BEFORE found only one questionably reliable source and one obviously unreliable one, in addition to passing measures. Was speedy-deleted and recreated 30 minutes later."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 15:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosula Foundation (February 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosula Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rosula Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rosula_Foundation Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rosula_Foundation reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Moses Bliss


A tag has been placed on Moses Bliss, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Celestina007 (talk) 23:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, Ugochimobi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 11:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Sonnie Badu moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sonnie Badu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 17:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 10:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Xtreme Crew moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Xtreme Crew, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Slow Down
I think it is in your best interest to slow down in creating articles until you understand to satisfaction our notability guidelines which you clearly do not have a clue about. At this juncture, your incessant creation of non notable articles is becoming very disruptive. Celestina007 (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Dear Celestina007 I'm so sorry about that. Seriously and totally understand every single thing about wiki editing and wiki articles. I'll just pause creating articles at the moment. Thanks dear.Ugochimobi (talk) 11:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xtreme Crew
 Ugochimobi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ugochimobi help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xtreme Crew
 Xtreme Crew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Xtreme_Crew help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

February 2021
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ugochimobi, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. CUPIDICAE💕 13:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Xtreme Crew, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ugochimobi, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Celestina007 (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC) Dear Celestina007 I want to make it known that I wasn't paid for anything or any of my recent edits. I cannot and will never accept payment for edit. Thanks, dear.Ugochimobi (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned twice before, this is your third warning. Celestina007 (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Fourth Warning Celestina007 (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Xtreme Crew for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xtreme Crew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Xtreme Crew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 13:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Rox Nation moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rox Nation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rox Nation has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rox Nation. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

What sort of falsehood, impersonation, & UPE is going on here?
You inserted this in your own talk page by your own self. What sort of blatant lie, falsehood and impersonation is that? I moved this Overt UPE garbage to draftspace & told you here to slow down & you promised to but you clearly lied about that because your next move would be to move the UPE article back to mainspace & proceed to insert this outright falsehood and act as though it was accepted by AFC when it clearly wasn’t. Look You wouldn’t be the first editor to try to game the system & you wouldn’t be the last but the result is always the same; an indef block. Celestina007 (talk) 14:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * My dearest and sweetest Celestina007 trust me I've offended you personally, like aside from wikipedia. But deeply sorry, I'll just focus on expanding stub articles for now. Please don't be annoyed dear User:Celestina007Ugochimobi (talk) 20:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Dearest & Sweetest is very much intimate & I don’t appreciate that. This isn’t the first time you have promised to change and do better moving forward but somehow you always seem not to keep your promise. If you aren’t here to build an encyclopedia I’d have no other option than to report you for UPE & using Wikipedia for promotional purposes which isn’t tolerated here. Consider this your last warning. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC) I promise this time Celestina007Ugochimobi (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rox Nation has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rox Nation. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 23:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prime9jaOnline Media (February 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pahunkat was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prime9jaOnline Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Prime9jaOnline Media, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Prime9jaOnline_Media Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pahunkat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Prime9jaOnline_Media reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pahunkat (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rox Nation (February 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rox Nation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rox Nation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rox_Nation Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rox_Nation reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prime 9ja Online (February 23)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Prime_9ja_Online Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 18:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Deb (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

A Sincere Appeal
I also stated it here that I was never paid for editing Wikipedia articles or creating, I am sincerely pleading a sincere review for an unblock Please. ugochimobi (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You received a sincere review and it reflects that you are the one being insincere through your abuse of multiple accounts. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Sincerely @ u was nerver related to the user, i dont know where he/she came from. Please.ugochimobi (talk) 20:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * @, @, if you both would permit me to communicate to him in the “Nigerian English” perhaps they’d have a better grasp of what is being relayed to them, if deemed inappropriate please do revert accordingly.
 * @, wetin dem dey yarn be say no be ordinary suspect them dey suspect you, wetin dem dey talk be say, oyibo computer and their ogbonge technology don catch you and their computer don tell them say na you be person wey dey control the @ account and their computer no dey make mistake. So no need to dey tell yeye yeye lie up & down because computer don catch you. So all this lie you dey tell Na for your pocket & dem no go unblock you, so you fit dey yarn dust or dey deny the obvious from now untill thy kingdom come, computer don catch you be say computer don catch you. Them use technical evidence nab you so my brother no bother to waste your time e don be, be say e don be. If you claim say you no understand wetin i just tell you, I fit still explain am for your tribal language which obviously Na Igbo you be & i dey speak and here Igbo wella. Even if tomorrow you go register another account dem go still catch you. Shey I been tell you here say all of us here no be small pikin? You don take your eye see as e dey hot now abi? Ha da agwa mmadu agwa okwa e fugo na anyi gi Na anyi aburo umuazi? Celestina007 (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Appeal for Unblock
I see no evidence of recent block evasion. For the reviewing admin, this removes the burden of the checkuser block; you are free to accept or decline the unblock request as you see fit. is the original blocking admin. --Yamla (talk) 17:59, 4 June 2021 (UTC)


 * But It actually shows on the block banner that it was you ugochimobi (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I politely suggest I would decline to unblock you if I was the person reviewing this request. You haven't told us what you plan to write about instead and you haven't told us who you were working for. Other reviewing admins may be more willing to simply lift the block, though, which is why I didn't take action here. Plus, it would be inappropriate for me to decline your request. :) --Yamla (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Concerning what happened in February, I think it was a misconception of what I am actually, I am actually here to support and build a good encyclopedia, Maybe I was too fast in creating articles for people or organizations (that I am not connected to) and it now seems to be I am working for them.
 * So who should I say I am working for when I'm actually not working for nobody? I am just one neutral person here to build an encyclopedia.
 * I sincerely don't know what to say. ugochimobi (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Concerning what happened in February, I think it was a misconception of what I am actually, I am actually here to support and build a good encyclopedia, Maybe I was too fast in creating articles for people or organizations (that I am not connected to) and it now seems to be I am working for them.
 * So who should I say I am working for when I'm actually not working for nobody? I am just one neutral person here to build an encyclopedia.
 * I sincerely don't know what to say. ugochimobi (talk) 08:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Appeal
ugochimobi (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You have failed to disclose your paid status, address why you created a sock account, state your COI with the plethora of non notable persons and entities you created. To be frank, you joined the encyclopedia for the wrong reason and you are yet to be honest about this and until such a time when you choose to be honest unblocking you would just be enabling a/an WP:LBFG. Celestina007 (talk) 12:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The reason I created another account was, at that time, I never knew there was something like unblocking since I saw blocked indefinitely, so I thought it was just permanent like not able to be unblocked. That's actually why I decided to create another account.
 * For my paid disclosure, I am not connected to anybody or subject I created an article for then, I mean maybe I should just say I had no idea how Wikipedia was operated then, that's It.
 * But If disclosing a COI (which I know I am not having any conflict of interest) would resolve this, then I wouldn't hesitate to disclose. plus I know for sure that I didn't join the encyclopedia for the wrong reason. ugochimobi (talk) 12:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I am unable to disclose paid status because of the block, so maybe you could help me place the tag on my userpage. ugochimobi (talk) 12:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * if memory serves me right, you created the sock account prior your indef block, infact it was one of the reasons you got indef blocked and not after. To declare that you do not have a COI with the plethora of non notable biographies and entities you created prior your block is blatant deception. I think you remaining indefinitely blocked is only proper as you clearly commenced editing here with a wrong preconceived notion. Celestina007 (talk) 12:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You mean I should remain indefinitely blocked because of COI that I don't even have?
 * Wow, you and I know that that's very unfair. I have actually seen cases here on WMF that are even worse than my case but were later unblocked.
 * I have been blocked since the 23rd of February, 2021 and it's the 5th of June. By 23rd June it'll be 4 months. A child that was born on the 23rd of February would be stronger by now.
 * You know what I am saying, How would I be taught a lesson for 4 months and still fail a test? I'm sure you know that I'm no kid.
 * Well, I (a commons autoconfirmed user) do not have a say in my unblock case because I cannot unblock myself. It's all up to the Administrators. ugochimobi (talk) 12:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @Ugochimobi, you said I am unable to disclose paid status because of the block, so maybe you could help me place the tag on my userpage. Do I understand correctly that you are now finally admitting that you have been paid by the various people and organizations you've created articles for? —valereee (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes I am admitting that btw!. ugochimobi (talk) 13:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Help Me
Please help me with deleting my wmf accounting, since there's no need having an accounting. ugochimobi (talk) 20:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Accounts cannot be deleted for legal reasons.  Bsoyka  ( talk &middot;  contribs ) 20:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * hmmm ugochimobi (talk) 20:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * More specifically, account deletion would put us in violation of our own content licence, which requires every edit be attributed both on commit and reuse. There also isn't a way to delete an account in the MediaWiki install Wikipedia uses AFAIK. 21:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rosula Foundation
Hello, Ugochimobi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rosula Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rox Nation
Hello, Ugochimobi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rox Nation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rox Nation


Hello, Ugochimobi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rox Nation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 20:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Appealing my block
There's block evasion happening here, with. Note also the same style of low-quality spam articles on that other account. However, the technical evidence is only possible, so the checkuser part of this block is lifted. Any admin is free to lift the block if they believe it appropriate to do so, after consulting with the original blocking admin,. If I thought this unblock request was sufficient, I'd have lifted it myself; I definitely don't. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I am planning to request that, that my alt (Joseph202) be globalled, because this is my main account. I'm also planning to disclose all the alts that I have, even before now, in a subpage of my userspace. Please Unblock me, I'd really appreciate it. I'm also assuring that I have sufficient knowledge of policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. Thank you in anticipation of your benevolent consideration.
 * Courtesy ping: ugochimobi (talk) 14:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Violating WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK until we catch you in the act shows nothing has really changed here. I strongly suggest the reviewing admin decline your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 14:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * After a whole year? and you still believe I haven't learnt anything at all? I mean, I am not by any chance Evading or Socking, I created that account because I really want to contribute to Wikipedia, I mean, if my intentions are really to disrupt Wikipedia, In won't keep coming here for block appeal. Like I said, I was going to get that account globalled, I am sincerely pleading for an unblock tbh. ugochimobi (talk) 14:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe you've learned nothing. For example, claiming you are not evading or socking, when you are very, very, very, very, very clearly doing both, shows you are a poor candidate for unblocking. It's not even like the contributions from that account were good, generally; same low-quality spam. Anyway, that's all I have to say here. It's in the hands of the reviewing admin. --Yamla (talk) 14:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I am in agreement with and I stand firmly by ’s block, and strongly refuse any lifting of the block in any capacity, if an infinite block could be evoked or an outright ban be proposed i’d support it in a heartbeat. @, it is very disrespectful and mendacious of you to WP:GAME the system in the egregious manner in which you have done, you clearly stated to have not evaded a block and “have learnt” from your previous errs whereas you were in-fact doing the inverse as you were evading a block. I’m sorry but I don’t believe you deserve editing privileges indefinitely or infinitely (if possible). You are yet to establish or show that you understand your transgressions, it’s damaging effects on our reputation as an encyclopedia nor have learnt anything from these egregious transgressions. Noting also that this account is probably an alternate account(sock) of an older user. Furthermore I believe this appeal to be TROLLING.Celestina007 (talk) 14:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * But this is not fair at all :( ugochimobi (talk) 14:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Unblock Appeal - User Ugochimobi
I see almost no contributions at the Nigerian pidgin Wikipedia. Are you sure this is the example you wish to use to demonstrate six months of constructive edits?!? It will likely count against you, rather than in favour of an unblock. --Yamla (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I have translated some articles into Nigerian pidgin and I want to keep doing that. And doing that isn't easy but I will keep translating as I can. ugochimobi (talk) 17:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * While it is true that my contributions at the Nigerian pidgin Wikipedia may not be extensive, I have been actively involved in editing and have made efforts to contribute constructively within the scope of my abilities. Although the volume of my contributions may not be significant, I have focused on quality rather than quantity. I have taken the time to familiarise myself with the guidelines and policies of the Nigerian pidgin Wikipedia, and I have made careful edits to improve the accuracy and readability of existing articles.
 * I understand that the expectation for a successful unblock appeal typically involves a substantial track record of constructive contributions. While I acknowledge that my contributions may not yet meet those expectations, I assure you that I am committed to continuing my efforts to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.


 * In light of your feedback, I am prepared to make a more concerted effort to actively engage with the Nigerian pidgin Wikipedia and contribute to a wider range of articles. I will seek opportunities to collaborate with other editors, participate in discussions, and expand my contributions in terms of both quantity and diversity.


 * I hope that this additional explanation of my contributions and my renewed commitment to contributing constructively can be taken into consideration during the evaluation of my unblock appeal. I apologize for any misunderstanding caused by my earlier communication and assure you of my dedication to learning and growing as a responsible editor.


 * Thank you for your attention and consideration. ugochimobi (talk) 17:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)