User talk:Ugvwiyuhi

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Ugvwiyuhi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Cherokee
I'm not certain what you're trying to do with this edit, but as you can see, what you did was add one broken link and one external link to the top of the article. If there's important information missing from the article, you can add it to the appropriate place, or, if you're having trouble deciding where it belongs, you can discuss the addition you want to make on the talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

I had no idea how angry and threatening people would be towards me for posting the truth about the real original Cherokee treaty name being Cherokee Nation of Indians.
 * That's interesting. Wikipedia works by collaboration, so if you aren't able to read and understand communication from others, you won't be able to be a successful editor.  Try re-reading my note again, and see if you can find the reason that your desired edits were being reverted.  It isn't because we are 'angry' about the 'truth,' it's because you were breaking links and adding information to the wrong place, and because you weren't discussing your desired changes with others.  Is there something controversial about them?  This isn't really a subject I know much about, but I'm sure that if this information is important, you and other editors can figure out the best place for it by discussing it on the talk page.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm certainly not angry about "the truth". Frankly, I couldn't care less about the correct naming of the treaty. I'm British - we don't have your history and it doesn't interest me all that much - but it seems to me that the name of a treaty doesn't require an entire encyclopaedia article to itself. Maybe the treaty does but for goodness sake not just its name. And even if it does what you wrote wasn't an article but just a few words and links that were meaningless to most people. If the correct naming of the treaty truly deserves a whole article, please write one that tells people about it in detail, in a neutral tone, backed up by references and explaining why it's a noteworthy topic. But above all when other editors in this collective encyclopaedia tell you that you're doing it wrong, please listen to them! andy (talk) 23:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Cherokee. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:48, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Cherokee Nation of Indians. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Cherokee Nation of Indians is NOT an article, it's a couple of links. Moreover there's a perfectly reasonable at Cherokee. Please STOP your disruptive actions or I shall ask for you to be blocked from editing wikipedia.'' andy (talk) 15:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for your disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war&#32;at Cherokee Nation of Indians. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~ mazca  talk 17:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC)