User talk:Uhai/Archives/April 2012

Regarding Rift (video game)
Hi Uhai, Why are fansites being removed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rift_%28video_game%29 ? I certainly am not trying to be any trouble, but I really would like to support Rift and build a community of users to help each other enjoy the game.

Thank you, Kevin
 * Response: User_talk:Kevin_Ortman -- Uhai (talk) 03:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Uhai,
 * That makes sense, thank you for your response.
 * Kevin Ortman (talk) 03:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello Uhai, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 13:01, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Tim Smit
I've semi-protected the article for 24h. Mjroots (talk) 10:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

FYI
. Cheers, --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Tow Trucker  talk  23:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Tow Trucker  talk  23:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The edit made on Naani page.
I dont think the edit that I had made amounts to vandalism even remotely. I have seen both the movies and I know for a fact that Naani movie's plot is a copy of 'Big'. If you think the world needn't know of cases of plagiarism so be it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.42.155.32 (talk) 15:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Your edit was unconstructive and furthermore did not belong in the Plot section of the article. If you can find a reliable source for any public accusations or lawsuits regarding this film plagiarizing Big then by all means add a "Controversy" section. - Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 15:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)