User talk:Uilleam1/Evaluate an Article

Feedback on Article Evaluation
I appreciate the thoroughness of your article review, and how you carefully address each of the questions and criteria that Wikipedia recommends you consider when evaluating an article. I have to admit that I know absolutely nothing about Acamapichtli and I have no idea how this article ended up on our list of available articles as, so far as I know, it has absolutely no connection with Gaelic music, song or dance! As a result, I really can't say whether the content is thorough or not, what content might be missing or misrepresented, and what sources might be available to augment the content and support the existing content. I'm glad you found it of interest, although I don't think it's going to help you with this course. I think you would be better prepared to tackle edits to a course-related article if you also evaluated a course-related article. It would be helpful, for example, to see whether the Newton chapter, the Campbell/Collinson article, and/or the Bannerman article are cited and, if not, whether any could be cited for a particular Gaelic-related music article. However, you do have a good understanding of how to do a thorough article assessment, so I'm confident that you will do a good job of assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a Gaelic music- or dance-related article. CBFraoch (talk) 20:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)