User talk:Uishaki/Archive 3

Speedy deletion criterion G7
Hi, Uishaki. I am removing the speedy deletion tags from several articles, as the tag you placed is for articles where there's only one author, and they are requesting deletion of the page. None of the articles you tagged qualify for deletion under that criterion. If you feel an article should be deleted, and it does not meet any of the criterion listed at Criteria for speedy deletion, please consider listing it at WP:AFD. -- Dianna (talk) 00:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

2012 CECAFA Cup
I posted a new message on Talk:2012 CECAFA Cup in order to try and reach a consensus on the article's format. I'm urging you to participate in order to prevent any future edit-warring and unnecessary blocks. Davykamanzi &rarr; talk  &middot; &#32; cont ribs  01:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

2012 WAFF Championship
Hello. I do not want to get into an edit war but your edits of trying to put a team statistics section when there is an "imbalance", as in the case of Jordan only playing two games from the group stage and therefore how can you say that they should be ranked 10th? If you are going to do this then please provide a reference, it's as simple as that. Saying that "the whole article is a source" in not legitimate. Thank you. Mas y mas (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

2013 Gulf Cup of Nations
I think you should answer your own question my friend! You were the one who undid my revision to begin with! Mas y mas (talk) 09:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * You don't think I'm trying to do the same? I also changed the table for the groups to a more simple version yet you revert them.  For participating teams, it's redundant to the draw section.  There is absolutely no reason to list the teams over and over and over again throughout the page!  It's in fact you that is being disruptive.  So please do not revert my edit again. Thank you! Mas y mas (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * So what you're saying is that you are not up for any change? Well my friend, some breaking news for, just because you're not up for it, doesn't mean it's not good or relevant.  You were also involved in the 2012 WAFF Championship page.  There is no section for "participating teams" because it's redundant.  The team tables for the group stage is also the simplified version and much easier to update!  So I don't know what you're problem is!  For the final time, I will undo your edit.  If you still persist then I will report you for being disruptive!  Thank you!  Mas y mas (talk) 11:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hiding? haha. Please tell me what type of content I've been trying to "hide"?  Yes, I've removed content, but as I said, content I've removed was redundant therefore its removal was necessary. Mas y mas (talk) 14:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Please tell me, what is it about the word redundant that you don't understand? You're persistence for adding redundant content is extremely baffling and getting annoying. You also don't even know what I'm talking about when I told you about the simplified tables. It shows that you're being extremely ignorant. The tables I was referring to earlier were for the GROUP TABLES IN THE GROUP STAGE! Yet you tell me I don't know anything about international competitions? Haha! I think you should tell that to yourself. Mas y mas (talk) 14:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh, it's very clear what you to "deliver"..... deliver redundant content that is! You on the other hand seem like you don't even know what you're doing as well as saying because if you knew what I was doing, then you'd understand what redundant content is! Just look at the 2012 WAFF Championship page. You try to add unsourced content and claim that the entire page itself is a source. It just shows that you're the one here that doesn't have clue what you're doing, not me! Also, how in the world is it vandalism what I'm doing? Nice try. Mas y mas (talk) 15:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Requesting deletion of articles
Hi Uishaki. Your requests for the speedy deletion of 2015 AFC Asian Cup squads and Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup have both been declined by myself and Waggers as you were not the sole or original author of those pages. If you still feel these should be deleted, I would suggest PRODing them instead, ensuring that you give a valid reason as to why it should be deleted. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a message. Cheers, ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 16:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

2013 AFCON
What is it with you anyway? You always have to have things your way! You don't seem to have any sort of capacity to comprehend certain things as demonstrated with your annoyance at the 2013 Gulf Cup of Nations page, and now at the 2013 Africa Cup of Nations page. Yes, this matter is somewhat small but it's quite clear that you're another editor who has to have things there way. So tell me, what's wrong with not having a table for the match officials section? There is a big waste of space to the right if it's in a table! With your logic (and persistent annoyance), the goalscorers section should also be in a table, yet it isn't!! So again, tell me what's wrong with having it the way I did it?! Mas y mas (talk) 14:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That's it? Some things change (for the better).  Not every single thing from one edition of a sports page to another will be the same.  At the same time, I could easily go to those other AFCON pages and change the format if that's what you're so worried and even being an annoyance about. Mas y mas (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * What?? Sorry but you're not making sense.  But anyway, just like you, I don't want to get into edit wars either.  But in this case, it's you that's making things difficult due to your fetish for having everything the same even if there's a better alternative.  Let's just end this as I'm fed up dealing with you, so I'm gonna change it back to my revision and don't bother reverting it!  Mas y mas (talk) 17:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2013 Africa Cup of Nations. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

2013 Africa Cup of Nations
Hey, i was joking because you counted it wrong (3 instead of 4), relax... Kante4 (talk) 20:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Yemen national football team. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 17:05, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * In future please post on my talk page, not in my talk page archives - it was mere luck I spotted your message. You have added a whole heap of unreferenced information, I have every right to remove it and will continue to do so. Please see WP:RS and WP:V. GiantSnowman 22:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

2013 CONCACAF Gold Cup
Why did you resort the group tables? They were in alphabetical order, which is what they should be per http://www.goldcup.org/page/GoldCup/Standings/0,,12802,00.html wilson (talk) 13:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, well it is nice of CONCACAF to have two different versions. Thanks for the response and source. wilson (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palestine national football team results – 2010s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Jewish religious terrorism
Please stop attempting to rename Category:Jewish religious terrorism to Category:Jewish terrorism. Category:Jewish terrorism was discussed and as a result it was renamed to Category:Jewish religious terrorism. See here. That makes sense, since the article is named Jewish religious terrorism. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of the UN resolutions concerning Israel and Palestine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intifada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yaquq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group C standings
Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group C standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=557958910 your edit] to Hassan Abdel-Fattah may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Thickbeard1011
I'm sorry, I don't mean to bother you, but the only reason why I keep reverting your edits to those articles is because your edits are inaccurate and lack some information. I'm just trying to help, and for your information, I've been editing these articles longer than you have, and trust me I know what I'm doing more than you, no offense. Please, I beg you to stop doing that and to not report me. You're Palestinian aren't you?! What would you know about Jordanian footballers?! Do me a favor and not try to make all Jordanian footballers sound like they're of Palestinian descent or origin! It's not completely true! And I'm Jordanian, so I should know, don't mean to be racist or rude. Or, you could at least tell me where you're getting this information from or how you're getting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thickbeard1011 (talk • contribs) 03:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC) No, I don't have a problem with Palestinians. In fact, I actually love Palestinians. I just want to know where you're getting this info from. And just to let you know, a lot of articles I've created here on Wiki don't lack cite sources, why do you think I add some references and external links to them?! Please do me a favor and not mess with these articles because they're mine and I don't like anyone editing them unless they're adding accurate info onto them, with no grammar errors, and not leave any piece of true info behind or unknown.

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fadi Lafi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

World Cup Standings Template
Please wait until the games are over before updating the standings template with the results. Don't use the scores of games in progress. Thanks. Smartyllama (talk) 12:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Israel national football team, you may be blocked from editing. (and many more articles related). If you can't read the source given as proff you are wrong don't edit the related wikipedia articles. – HonorTheKing (talk) 19:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 1934 FIFA World Cup qualification. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

A topic in Wikiproject Football about the issue
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football, you can read. – HonorTheKing (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC) – HonorTheKing (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC) – HonorTheKing (talk) 07:12, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Stop reverting to your version, before posted on wikiproject I have reverted to natural version which you later reverted back to yours. So that breaks the rules, especcily that you don't bother reading the posted information.
 * Please engage in the discussion above. As noted by FIFA, "Palestine entered the qualifying competition for the first time in the run-up to the 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan. The Palestine that had participated in previous competitions in the 1930s was actually the forerunner of today's Israel team, and as such bears no relation to the national team of modern Palestine." If you continue to edit war, you will be blocked. Thanks, Number   5  7  15:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * As you refuse to answer in the wikiproject page, how will you answer to the question that all players and staff played in the 1934 and 1938 game were Jewish, had white shirt with Magen David and played under both God Save the Queen and Ha-Tikva. The Arab Palestine refuse to call it as thier own, but you seem not to understand this. FIFA and UEFA for more than once say Israel hold those records and that Palestine played its first game in 1953 in Pan Arabic games and joined FIFA in 1998. If you read the sources given in Wikiproject or even read the sources you are posting you will see how wrong you are.

There's enough disharmony in the world without bringing it to Wikipedia. --  Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

http://www.11v11.com/
Hi, I have noticed you seem to like this website as a source. You have edit warred by using it as a refernce to use Palestine from the current era over the historical Mandate territory. If you wish then you could change Isreal to the oldest FA in the world founded in the year 0. It is full of in accurate information, ROI doing well to win a game, 25 years before it existed. You could take this issue to the RSN, there are too many inaccuracies. Also you have reverted in a very troublesome area, Arab-Isreal, this isnt advised. Several editors have tried to communicate with you and you havent engaged in discussion, I am AGF here and adding this link to the relevant discussion, as an editor with over 10,000 edits and a clean block log, you must understand the importance of discussion on Wikipedia. If this keeps going the way its going I will unfortunately have to ask for page protection, to help bring the discussion forward. I would ask you not to revert again in the artciles as the subject matter is sensitive and can bring blocks. Thanks for reading and hope to see you join in the discussion. Murry1975 (talk) 20:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding The issue about the Eretz Israel/Palestine games. The thread is ‎A user keep reverting to his version without taking part in the talk page. Thank you. — – HonorTheKing (talk) 07:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Ani notice
Please see here [] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 07:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Blocked for edit warring
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bishonen &#124; talk 08:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC).

Reliable Arabic-language sports media
I'm planning to be adding the Arabic-language names for Europe-based football players with Arab origins. I observe that there are large inconsistencies online regarding the spellings of most of the names concerned (for example, like شمسين and شامسين, or like أوبادي and عبادي and العبادي). I check the names listed at Soccerway Arabic, but, double-checking them online, it doesn't seem to me to be a particularly reliable source for the names specifically. Do you know what Arabic-language online sports media or databases would have the accurate name variants? Maybe multiple sources should be checked depending on the specific Arab country from which the individual player originates. --Theurgist (talk) 22:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=593599366 your edit] to 2014 AFC Cup qualifying play-off may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:44, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Time of matches not vandalism
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that someone inserting the local time for football matches is definately not vandalism so please to not use "rvv" in you edit summary. Instead discuss the matter. Thank you. QED 237  (talk)  23:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I do also want to let you know that if I can find the time tomorrow I will look in to this since for the Uefa euro 2012 qualification local time was use and in most cases i think we should use the local time in qualifications. QED 237   (talk)  23:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Great, thank you for your cooperation and good interaction for resolving the disagreement.--Uishaki (talk) 23:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

UEFA Euro 2016 qualifiers
I have absolutely no idea why you have reverted the kick-off details.

Not only did the calculations take plenty of time and effort but the localised KO details are standard practice on all past WP articles regarding qualifiers, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Euro_2012_qualifying_Group_A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Euro_2008_qualifying_Group_A

I have reverted your unnecessary edits for the last time before taking it to a community discussion if you revert again. Sinfony81 (talk) 15:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

2013–14 UEFA Champions League knockout phase
Hi. Do you know what you are doing? Why remove scorers and then revert me? You must look out for edit conflicts when editing. Did you get edit conflict? QED 237  (talk)  21:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello. No I did not get edit conflict. I just added the scorers for Schalke vs Real Madrid, so i did not make any mistakes.Uishaki (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The scorers for all matches was already added when you removed scorers for chelsea-gala, and after that you reverted me so you made two mistakes. Especially the revert I see no reason for. QED 237   (talk)  22:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * You are correct I indeed had made a mistake but it was not intentional. In any case, I will try not to repeat it again.Uishaki (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, no worries we all make mistakes, just be aware in these situations when matches just ended. A lot if people want to edit at the same time and very often skyblueshaun makes complete edits and add everything in a single edit. QED 237   (talk)  22:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Also you should not add results until match is finished like you did here. Napoli-Swansea ended 3-1 and not 2-1. Soon you might get warned for this disruptive edits. QED 237  (talk)  20:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Saudi league
I can't read Arabic. Why does the OFFICIAL Saudi Pro league website and FIFA say Ettifaq are NOT relegated when they saw Al Shoalah are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weka (talk • contribs) 22:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't know why, however all reliable Arabic sport websites has confirmed that Al-Ittifaq have been relegated from the top flight.,, --Uishaki (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

But surely it can't be more official than FIFA and the OFFICIAL SPL website, no? What trumps those two websites? Nothing. Because those are about as official as you can get.... --weka (talk) 23:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

All sources says that Al-Ettifaq (means the agreement) are relegated to the First Division, but only few tables are incorrect.--Uishaki (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Does that matter if the official website says Al Shoulah are relegated. Those sources are unofficial. The official websites says Al Ettifaq are not relegated. Change it back or I will get the higher ups. weka (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Why do you not want to understand that the second club who relegated is Al-Ettifaq not Al-Shoalah, even the players of Ettifaq were crying here. I would not change it, and if you do that i will report you. It is not my problem that you do not know Arabic. I provided ​​many sources while you gave only two.--Uishaki (talk) 00:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Alright, you win. I guess you better tell FIFA.com and the official Saudi league website that they are wrong >_<. Also change this "Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored." because you know better than me. Apologies --weka (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your cooperation and also the advices.--Uishaki (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Arab Jews
I (again) undid your edit at Category:Palestinian Jews. You change a category with another one which is not equal, and not correct in itself. Also, on a procedural note, please not that per WP:BRD you should discuss any edit that is reverted rather than redoing it. Edit warring may lead to sanctions. Debresser (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

your revert
There is a reason for not showing all the villages to certain users!! Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Palestinian_Arab_villages_depopulated_during_the_1948_Palestinian_exodus#Blofeld_stubs

...and please revers, Cheeers, Huldra (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The problem is in YOUR setup, probably in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Uishaki/monobook.js

(see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Huldra/monobook.css for my setup)

If you log out, you will note that all the villages are seen with equal color... It is rather frustrating with editors like you, who come out of the blue and make major changes to a template which you know nothing about, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * ok, I see you have you have edited your . User:Uishaki/monobook.js ,
 * Now: try to revert your edit on Template:Palestinian Arab villages depopulated during the 1948 Palestinian exodus: (I cannot do it, as I would break 1 RR), and hopefully you will see all articles which are expanded as blue, and the stubs as red. This is an extremely valuable tool for me when I have expanded these articles, basically I know that the "blue" articles (in theory) have all the different sources which I then can copy over to whatever stub I am expanding. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

1 RR
You have broken 1 RR on Ilan Pappé. (See the talk page). If you don´t revert, I will report you. Huldra (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reverting, Huldra (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Al-Arabi Sc kuwait
umm... excuse me why did you edit Al-Arabi SC when we have 56 trophies and you changed it to 55 and other edits while these events happend this year where they have one the federation cup and the volly ball league in this season and finished fifth this year — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalid sadeq (talk • contribs) 19:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Because you added incorrect sentences and without any sources like "which is said to be renewed to become a much better stadium in the upcoming years but we have not heard from the Kuwait sport and youth federation from them."--Uishaki (talk) 19:08, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Your recent editing history at Falafel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period) restriction. To avoid remaining in violation, please self-revert.'' Hertz1888 (talk) 01:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)