User talk:Uishaki/Archive 4

WP:ARBPIA alert
— Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Ayran
Hi. You recently added a category (Arab cuisine) to the Ayran page. Your edit was reverted, removing that category from the page. I then reverted the revert, adding back the category to the page. You then reverted my revert of the first revert, deleting that category from the page. Are you sure you didn't do this in error? If you do want the Arab cuisine category included @ Ayran, then why remove it the next day? Fleetham (talk) 13:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 2014 Palestine International Championship for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Palestine International Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2014 Palestine International Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 15:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
Your recent editing behavior was brought to my attention via the edit warring noticeboard. After review, I am applying the following sanction:

May 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Edenc1 • Talk 17:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

AFC Challenge Cup
Afghanistan and Laos did not one score. Why do you think the score is 1-0? Who score? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Younis7435 (talk • contribs) 13:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

According to the AFC Report Afghanistan 0-0 Laos--Uishaki (talk) 13:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Massacres committed by Zionists
Template:Massacres committed by Zionists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 03:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 00:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=611076592 your edit] to Ramzi Saleh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Ramzi Saleh (رمزي صالح); born 8 August 1980 is a Palestinian footballer. He plays as a [[

--- Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Night of the Bridges, Battle of Buqqar Ridge, Battle of Beersheba (1917) you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked once for that kind of violations and it's only a matter of time before you are blocked again. Infantom (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

You have violated 1RR
You have violated the one-revert restriction on Battle of Beersheba (1917), Battle of Buqqar Ridge, and Night of the Bridges.

Please self-revert (undo your last edit) or I will report you for the edit-warring violation. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * You were warned earlier about making bad-faith accusations about other editors' religions. Please stop. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Personal attack block
I have blocked you for 72 hours for this personal attack. You can use unblock to request an unblock. See also WP:GAB.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I've increased your block duration to two weeks from today for block evasion by .--Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Uishaki,
 * Several of our edits are good and others are controversial. You should pay more attention to this and try to get consensus on the talk page.
 * Anyway, you have an entered in a spiral that will lead you to the indefinite ban if you don't stop this.
 * Just for yourself, please, respect the "block" conditions and take benefit of this time to rest but don't try to evade your block. You will be caught for sure and this will be doubled in time at each case.
 * Pluto2012 (talk) 07:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nayef Hawatmeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Operation Protective Edge
Hi Uishaki,

I removed a recent post you made to Talk:Operation Protective Edge since it was more about commenting on the on going conflict rather than improving the article. Please just stick to talking about how to improve the article, that would be helpful and in the spirt of the project. Thanks! --Malerooster (talk) 16:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * ==Your userpage==

Hi, Uishaki. Your userpage keeps getting vandalized by dynamic IPs. Would you like me to semiprotect it so that IPs can't edit it? Bishonen &#124; talk 23:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC).


 * Yes off course.--Uishaki (talk) 23:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Done, after a lot of edit conflicts. The xx.55 IP has been blocked. If they return with another IP, I'll semi this page as well. Bishonen &#124; talk 23:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC).


 * Semiprotected. Bishonen &#124; talk 23:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC).

You have violated 1RR
You have violated the one-revert restriction on Operation Protective Edge.

Please self-revert (undo your last edit) or I will report you for the edit-warring violation. Thank you. Brad Dyer (talk) 21:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Which edit?--Uishaki (talk) 21:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Your last one (where you removed a "see also" link. Brad Dyer (talk) 21:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Block Notice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Operation Protective Edge. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mike V •  Talk  22:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Please note this is for a violation of WP:1RR per the active arbitration remedies.


 * No, they are not excluded by any stretch of the imagination. Your reverts,  and  ADDED BACK material that was contentious.  You didn't revert vandalism (read WP:VANDAL for what is and isn't vandalism) you were edit warring over content that is very loaded.  You were only blocked 24 hours, less than your last edit warring block, so that is pretty kind, if you think about it. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124;  WER  23:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for finding that out and correcting the mistake. 1RR is not something I frequently encounter and I missed the part about IPs being exempt in this specific subset of articles.
 * Uishaki, I apologize for the error with the block. I do hope that you will consider the spirit of the 1RR rule and raise your concerns on the talk page in the future. I understand that the Arab-Israeli topics can be highly contentious and many of our editors and readers are emotionally, and some even physically, involved in the subject matter. Keeping this in mind, I ask that you be mindful of your contributions to the article, strive to source it reliably, seek the assistance of others to word it neutrally, and encourage others to work collaboratively in a similar fashion. Best, Mike V  •  Talk  01:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I would have made the same mistake, and did on the first unblock review. It is the first 1RR exception I've ever seen with an IP exception. I normally don't patrol I/P articles.  Fortunately, his second request wasn't padded with opinion and I took it serious enough to research a bit and was just as shocked as you were.  We admins don't know everything, we can't, but we will work together to correct good faith errors when we find them.  I think the note I made in the unblock will show that the original block was a good faith error.  Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124;  WER  01:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reactions to Operation Protective Edge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy delete nomination - Shuja'iyya massacre
Please see article's talk page for details.

Speedy deletion nomination of Shuja'iyya massacre


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Shuja'iyya massacre, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jersey92 (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 16:43, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

3RR at Shuja'iyya Incident (2014)
Just a heads up, your at 3 reverts on the description of the incident as a massacre, and have made a number of other reverts to the article in the last 24 hours. Since you haven't been warned, I'll give you a break on the WP:3rr block, but you need to stop reverting and let other people guide the article for awhile. Reverting IPs is exempt from the 1rr rule applicable to Israel-Palestine articles, but is not exempt from the regular 3rr rule. Monty 845  01:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Shuja'iyya Incident (2014) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shuja'iyya Incident (2014) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shuja'iyya Incident (2014) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪  ߷  ♀ 投稿 ♀  05:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Druze sportspeople
I have declined your speedy deletion nomination, because I see no reason to call this a hoax. The Druze are evidently a distinct community. If you think this category should not exist, nominate it at WP:Categories for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

AE
Please see --Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 20:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 29 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Nayef Hawatmeh page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=619037282 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F619037282%7CNayef Hawatmeh%5D%5D Ask for help])

July 2014 (update: erroneous block, now lifted)
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating the topic ban imposed above by editing the articles Palestinians in Syria and Nayef Hawatmeh, which are related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there.  Sandstein  06:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.

Yunshui, thanks for notifying me. The block was in error, I misread the timestamps of the last edits and the topic ban, respectively. I am removing the block and the log entry. My apologies.  Sandstein  11:24, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palestinians in Syria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

African football TASK FORCE


User:Davykamanzi is pushing for the creation of an African football task force at WikiProject Football given the recent spike in articles regarding African football competitions and their seasons. Would be great if you went there and signed up given the work you've done on such articles.

--Lglukgl (talk) 21:19, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Albert Ebossé
Hi. Please start a discussion before undoing my work. As I explained to you, it takes a while to clean the sources and TO MERGE WITH YOUR WORK, because I kept what you did. Regards Lesviolonsdautomne (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I would also suggest being hit on the pitch was being taken ill on the pitch, so he is a "player who dies whilst playing" as per the category definition.--Egghead06 (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * NOOOOOO, You are wrong read the player's article well "Bodjongo was struck on the head by a projectile thrown by one of the angry JSK fans while the teams were leaving the field at the end of a home game between JSK and USM Alger."--Uishaki (talk) 16:51, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

This player died as a result of playing and he is eligible for including in that category. Please do not continue to revert, or else you might be blocked. GiantSnowman 17:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

2019 AFC Asian Cup
Did you ask Bearcat? It should be just after 8:00 am in his time zone if I remember correctly and he may not have seen the notice yet. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 12:13, 24 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Because he is the one that protected it and Requests for page protection says "Please post requests in this section for removing or reducing the protection level of a page if the protecting admin is inactive or you have already asked them." CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 21:26, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

2019 AFC Asian Cup
Done per request — the vandalism was three years ago, so there's no longer a compelling reason why it needs to stay protected anymore. Bearcat (talk) 18:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Munir El Haddadi


I assume good faith, but please supply a source when you wish to move Munir's maternal surname to his middle name. As this diagram shows, in his mother's home city of Melilla, "Mohamed" is the most common surname. Munir is a natural-born Spanish citizen, thus he has his father's surname (El Haddadi) and for legal purposes his mother's surname (Mohamed) afterwards. It is actually known for males in Ceuta and Melilla to be called "Mohamed Mohamed Mohamed" as a result of these regulations. Thank you and happy editing &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 10:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I understand it know, and thanks for the clarification.--Uishaki (talk) 11:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Use sensible tags
To tagged two pages by for deletion as nonsense. These tags were themselves nonsense. The proper reason could have been given thus:. I am also very dubious about your "hoax" tags on three other articles by 1997Vzla but I will leave another admin to deal. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating the topic ban imposed above by editing the article War on Terror, which is related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Dougweller (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.


 * This edit with the edit summary "(Hamas, Islamic palestinian jihad, PLO is irrelevant)", with the edit summary " Remove material by israeli propagandist; Hamas and PIJ are national liberation movements)" and  with the edit summary " (how is israel a belligerent???)" are very clearly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. &mdash; Dougweller (talk) 16:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Champions League and other issues
Hi again,

Sorry for a very long message but it explains a lot of things and possibly why things went as they did tonight. Please read even if it is very long as it may help you from being blocked in the future (which may happen if you continue like this).

I made subsections to improve reading and you can comment each section individually if you want.

I am opening this thread/discussion for clearing the air after what has happened tonight and to give my version of everything. Feel free to ignore it, but I would like to discuss this and perhaps you (and I) can learn something as you have already been blocked 9 times and it would not be good for you to be blocked again. QED237&#160;(talk)</b></i> 23:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Apologies and warnings
First of all I am sorry if I offended you in any way, I got tired of you updating to early and that scores has to be changed after your edits because of last minute goals, but that does not give me the right to use the words I did. However I stopped Immediately when I was told to stop, and after that you continued yourself,  and, so I told you to stop,. Then you gave me a complete improper final warning,, back as some sort of revenge even if I had stopped earlier which our timestamps of the diffs shows. It seems like you were interested in some sort of war (and you have been blocked for edit warring in the past), but as I said sorry for my choice of words. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 23:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Incorrect scores
As I mentioned above you almost always edit a few minutes before the matches has ended and thus adding the wrong score and result for some matches and incorrect standings tables. Then correction edits has to be made after you and I got tired of it. When we other editors want to add correct score we get edit conflict just because you were "first" and updated a minute before when match was not ended. When those edits are incorrect it is frustrating. That is not acceptable so please wait until you are completely sure matches has ended and you add the correct score otherwise it is disruptive editing and you may be blocked again. A good way is to see when matches end at UEFA.com livescore center. I always updated directly when they end there.

Here are some examples of incorrect edits, being corrected immediately after:
 * 1) (add score 0-0 for Ludo-Basel that ended 1-0) which was corrected after some reverting here  (it was also incorrect blue color but will come to that later).
 * 2) (add score 4-0 for Ath-MFF that ended 5-0) which was corrected after some reverting here  (incorrect standings order but will come to that in next section).
 * 3) (add score 2-2 for Macedonia-Luxemburg that ended 2-3) which was corrected here

You have also been told about this in the past,, so please make sure you add correct scores and that the final whistle is blown. Wikipedia is not for instant updating so if you wait an extra minute or two checking your edit that wont be a bad idea. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 23:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Rules and tiebreakers
When updating tables please make sure you are familiar with all regulations and tiebreakers so you put teams on the correct places and also adds correct colors of poromtion and elimination on the correct team (will take color in section below). To many times order of teams has to be changed after you when you add incorrect order. In FIFA competition teams are ordered based on goal differential. UEFA on the other hand uses head-to-head results as first tiebreaker. When three or more teams have same points it is still head-to-head but with those three teams so you make a new minor table with the results of the matches between those teams.

Here are some examples were order of teams had to be corrected:
 * 1) you put Madrid ahead of Olympiacos when olympiacos did beat athletico and head-to-head is tiebreaker, this was corrected later by IP.
 * 2) here you put according to goal diff again even if it is head-to-head record, later fixed by me, but I made minor error that was also corrected . Then you made a edit I cant explain  dont know where that order comes from.
 * 3) You put albania ahead of denmark when denmark is ahead on head-to-head (away goal), later corrected
 * 4) germany ahead of ireland when ireland should be ahead on tiebreaker (no head-to-head since they had not met), fixed after your edit.

As I said please make sure you got all the offical rules and tiebreakers in mind when updating. Your way of reverting after someone corrects the order shows you dont know and in examples above there are several different users all correcting order after you. The tiebreakers are often listed at the article for the tournament. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 23:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Calculations of possible qualification and colors
I have seen you adding incorrect colors for qualification and elimination for teams and insisting you are right not listening to others.

For example when putting blue on real madrid, several times. For Real madrid case all 4 teams can get 9points and then Real Madrid may be last placed team, this will happen if all of them beat real and then win one each against eachother, i.e. Ludo beats Basel, Basel beat Liverpool and Liverpool beat Ludo.

In the same way you said RSA can not finish last (4th) even if others did not agree , and it was also discussed at your talkpage where you admitted you were wrong

Even if you admitted you were wrong you had warned the IP for not agreeing with you on RSA and now tonight you warned him again for removing blue color on Real Madrid even if it should not be blue and on top of all of that you did not let IP remove the warnings on his own talkpage. That is disturbing to me. I know you think I am that IP but I am not and you can see that because I have never updated the african cup article. I suggest an appology to the IP. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 23:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Improper warnings
This is the most serious section that may lead to a long block if it is continued. You warned an IP two times (seen at ) and you also suddenöy gave me a final warning,, for something I had stopped doing just as a revenge. I explained you above why those warnings were incorrect and still when the IP clears his talkpage, as he is allowed to, it is his own talkpage, you revert his talkpage and re-insterts the warnings and remove my comment in the process, saying to him not to do it again (seems like a threat). This is highly inappropriate behaviuor and could easily have you blocked. Not only do you incorrect warn a user you remove comments of others (mine) and edit war with editor on his own talkpage. When I saw this I was very tempted to report you, and I strongly suggest you appologise to the IP as a sign you knew you were wrong or after I have slept on it I may report you anyway. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 23:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Summary
You have been blocked nine times and still seem willing to "war" with editors is not a good sign. Also you edit to fast with wrong score, put up incorrect order in standings, put wrong teams as qualified (wrong colors) and you put improper warnings to editors when infact they did everything right and you were wrong. This while you insists you are right and goes in to reverting what is correct and hands out warning to editors who dont agree with you. I find that concerning so I suggest you take a step back a think before editing, as this is common mistakes when edits happen to fast. Everyone can put teams in wrong order (showed you I did), but when challenged discuss it with them and ask "why did you use that order" and so on instead of just reverting back as history shows you are most likely the one who is wrong. This editing can not continue and if you are blocked again I fear this time it may be a long block (lets hope it does not happen). I also suggest (as I said) you look at the edits you warned the IP for and realise they were not wrong and appologise to that editor.

I hope you read this as it is very informative and may stop you from being blocked again. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 23:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)