User talk:Uiviu

Nomination of Harvey Hilbert for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harvey Hilbert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harvey Hilbert until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi there Uiviu. I saw your comment at the Article for Deletion discussion. While many users want to jump in and create articles for topics that they see missing on the encyclopedia I think writing a good new article is an advanced skill on Wikipedia as it requires knowledge of notability (as Wikipedia defines it) and reliable sources (again as Wikipedia defines it). Even experienced editors sometimes get these wrong and so it can be especially hard for new editors. I think your actual composition of the article was thoughtfully done and in-line with Wikipedia conventions. I'm just not sure it is a notable topic hence my nomination. We'll see what the rest of the community thinks. If I can offer you help at Wikipedia feel free to ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)