User talk:Uketubestrilka

Borys Wrzesnewskyj
YouTube videos are not acceptable sources in Wikipedia articles. Factual or not, they're primary sources, not independent media, so they're not allowed under any circumstances. Bearcat (talk) 00:05, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It has nothing to do with "censorship" and everything to do with the facts that (a) YouTube is not an independent media source, and (b) Wikipedia cannot link to copies of reference content on sites that aren't actually the legal copyright holder of that content. CTV News is an acceptable reference, but the reference has to be to CTV News itself: that can be a weblink to a transcript or a video clip on their website, or it can be an unlinked citation to CTV in the format "Title of news report". CTV News Channel, Date. — but it cannot be to a YouTube copy of CTV content, because (a) the YouTube channel that the video was uploaded to is self-published by Mr. Wrzesnewskyj or his staff, and (b) CTV holds the copyright on it, not YouTube. Bearcat (talk) 21:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

I hear you thanks, but it seems these policies kill reference of truth. Right now according to you/wikipedia, anyone can go into the article on Borys and say "reference needed" to all the quotations (which were taken from the videos) and or delete them. Say for example, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin's comments on Borys are subject to deletion because there is "no acceptable wikipedia reference":

Paul Martin on Borys Wrzesnewskyj, MP http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6KM5p2Zdho

Regardless whether the content is self-published by Mr. Wrzesnewskyj or his staff, Borys and his staff are not the authors of that content. Rather, the former Canadian Prime Minister, Paul Martin, is the author of that content because he is speaking in the video and that is what is being referenced.

Sure fine, if some blowhard skews things ridiculously, absolutely, cut that nonsense out, but links referencing YouTube clips?
 * You can reference the statements to the actual media report: for instance, if the YouTube video is a clip of a CTV News report, you can cite CTV (not YouTube) as the source. One thing you may need to realize is that there's no requirement for our sources to necessarily be available on the web — we can cite books, we can cite old newspaper or magazine articles that haven't been republished on the web, we can cite television or radio reports that haven't been reposted to the web. But we can't cite to reposts of copyrighted content on websites that aren't themselves the holder of that copyright (like a video reposted on YouTube.) Bearcat (talk) 22:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Question: How can Borys' entry quote Paul Martin - spoken by Martin himself, if the source is not allowed to be referenced? Without a reference, then anyone can delete that section of Borys' entry citing "no reference" when in fact there is one.

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Mad Heads XL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dauphin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Adding unreferenced information to BLPs
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Lubomyr Luciuk. Thank you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 15:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your message.

Unreferenced or poorly referenced information? I could post a video for you to judge by yourself, but if it's not good enough for Wikipedia, then it's not good enough for anyone.

Speedy deletion nomination of Brotherhood for the Revitalization of Ukrainian Orthodoxy in Canada


A tag has been placed on Brotherhood for the Revitalization of Ukrainian Orthodoxy in Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - MrX 23:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)