User talk:Ukexpat/Archive 1

I saw the good work you were doing on various law-related articles, and thought I'd say hello (setting aside temporarily the Middle/Inner Temple rivalry for the greater good of Wikipedia!) If there's anything I can do to help, do let me know. Best wishes, Bencherlite 19:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Wadham College userbox
I know it's not really the "done thing" to edit other people's user pages, but I thought I would ignore that particular rule to leave a little something for you... I thought the text-only version of the "Wadham student" userbox was a bit boring, so I borrowed and cropped a photo from the Wadham article. I did think about using the coat of arms, but the version on Wikipedia isn't a "free use" version, only a "fair use" - I'm not a copyright lawyer, I just do what WP says! - and WP doesn't approve of fair-use images in userboxes. Anyway, hope you like it. The template is and is basically a cut-and-paste version of  but adding a photo instead of the last section. I can't work out how to get rid of the yellow comma, though! Best wishes, Bencherlite 21:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. My first template! Changing topic slightly, you might also be interested in a certain WikiProject - then you'll be entitled to another userbox, too!  There is a WikiProject for law, but I must admit that I've done nothing to help it since signing up... Bencherlite 21:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ukexpat. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that: you have under 250 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego talk  16:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Jeffrey Hackney, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. T Van Wormer 20:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ukexpat! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.  Daniel  07:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. Regrettably, I have declined your request as you do not have 500 mainspace edits. You are welcome to apply again at a later time. Feel free to contact me with any questions, alphachimp  20:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:FU
Your violation of WP:FU on Rhona Mitra has been reverted. --Yamla 20:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You said: "I was under the impression that my use of this image was fair use - it is also used in the Kit McGraw article."


 * As per WP:FU, we may not use fair-use images to depict living people. --Yamla 20:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries
Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be nearly nonexistent low:


 * Edit summary usage for Ukexpat: 0% for major edits and 3% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 143 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 12:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 21:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the League of Copyeditors
I'm very sorry I haven't had a chance to welcome you earlier, I have been incredibly busy lately. We are glad to have your help. Currently, we have really cut down the backlog of articles in need of copyedit. Therefore, a major goal at this moment is to identify new articles that are in need of work. When you run across them, be sure to tag them for copyediting.

If you have any questions at all, do not hesitate to drop me a line. Trusilver 06:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the welcome. Fly safe. --ukexpat 13:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Alex Leake
Thank you for cleaning up the article Alex Leake. However, you made two changes with which I disagree.

The title of two web-pages cited included a range of years which the original author had used a hyphen to separate, e.g. Quietly Making History ... Part Two: 1911-1915. When quoting the name of a work I would think it best to quote it accurately, in this case with the original hyphen.

Secondly, you changed the separator between the dates of birth and death in the opening paragraph from a spaced en-dash to a spaced em-dash. MOS:DATE examples use the spaced en-dash. I see no reason to go against the MoS.

Again, thank you for taking the time and trouble to look over the article. Struway2 | Talk 23:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 05:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 21:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Max Mosley
I object most strongly to your identification of my four edits of Max Mosley as vandalism, which led to them being deleted. Each and every one of them was carefully sourced. They were researched at some length and to have them wiped out so dismissively, arbitrarily and unfairly is frustrating. They concern an important subject. Please justify and please reconsider. Duncan Berger (talk • 00:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Dear Ukexpat, you posted the following on my talk page in response to my above:

If you had checked the history page for the Max Mosley article carefully you would have seen that it was not I who reverted your edits but user Kl4m.

Sorry, I misinterpreted K14m's comments which, to this new user's eyes at any rate, were ambiguously phrased. When he wrote "reverted 4 edits by Duncan Berger identified as vandalism to last revision by Ukexpat", I thought he meant that he had reverted my edits after they had been identified by yourself as vandalism to the last revision. I now see what he meant, i.e. that he had reverted my edits to the last revision made by yourself. As I say, please bear with me as I'm new, although perhaps a well-placed comma would have helped! Please also note, btw, that I never accused you of reverting my edits, as you suggest, but rather of identifying them as vandalism - however, that was incorrect in itself and once again I apologise. I was always aware that it was K14m who did the actual reversion and I left him a message at the same time, which led to his own message, reconsidering the reversion, which you have noted. Duncan Berger 11:01, 20 September 2007

Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007


Automatically delivered by COBot 03:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 15:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hey, I see you've now put yourself on the Greater Manchester list of participants. We appreciate any help and would love to hear any suggestions you may have. (I guess you saw the project in the signpost! :)). Thanks once again. Best, &mdash; Rudget Contributions 17:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39
   Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/18/episode-39-knol-pointer/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODU P  06:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call
Melon ‑ Bot  ( STOP! )  18:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

'Ad nauseum' ad nauseam
You know, I'd actually typed "nauseam", but it looked somewhat wrong in the edit box and so I changed it. Next time I'll trust my gut (or a dictionary) more. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! (And never worry about correcting my spelling or grammar - I do it frequently enough to others myself.) Confusing Manifestation (Say hi!) 23:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

i spent absolutely ages writing that article about my local retail park,but you have to be an ungrateful bastard who has to cock this site up.tell me why that article is not important —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harry-fox (talk • contribs) 15:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

this article is about an unnotable idiot that should be deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harry-fox (talk • contribs) 19:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Liber OZ
The editor who created this article removed the speedy tag, but I do think that it should not be a speedy candidate. I have adding an unreferenced tag, and perhaps you may feel that it should go to AFD. Random Fixer Of Things (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. It seems that it is still there, it is just that the Z is upper-case. Random Fixer Of Things (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User talk:Endexxco
A tag has been placed on User talk:Endexxco, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Your note
Hi. Thanks for your note. I have replied. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Fred Martin Super Store
Yo give it a little time to pick it was an article for about 5 minets before you put the tag on it. Let more people come and put stuff on it.Thewiseeye3400 (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Bedtime toy
Hey, I was about to expand it, I can move it to a subpage for now if you want.–Sidious1701(talk &bull; email &bull; todo) 02:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, okay, but I do believe you had one when you were a kid :)–Sidious1701(talk &bull; email &bull; todo) 02:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

prod?
You prodded guest house (lodging). Is checking the "what links here" button part of the due diligence you do before you place a prod on an article? Almost 50 articles point at that article.

I am not saying that clearing the wikipedia of cruft isn't important. It is important. But, in my experience, some of your colleagues who volunteer for the quality control patrols are hasty, and don't do simple obvious homework before they make their nomination.

I urge you to always check the "what links here" button before you make a nomination, if you aren't already doing so.

I don't think checking the actual article should have been part of your due diligence. But, I recently went through all of them, prior to drafting the stub you prodded. If you checked you would find that something like half of those articles refer to hotels, motels, hostels, bed and breakfasts and guest houses. It seems to me that the authors of those articles clearly thought that guest houses were different from those other kinds of lodgings. If you knew this would you have still recommended deletion?

Candidly, Geo Swan (talk) 05:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Brohemian Rhapsody
Don't delete this article just yet... I'll need a few days to get it up to par. --Busboy (talk) 05:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:UAA reporting
Hey -- noticed your report on User:Dbogardsmithbarney at WP:UAA. I can tell from the report that you thought this was a borderline case but might be blockable. It's best not to do that; please use WP:UAA only for obvious violations. In non-clear cases, if you really have a problem with the username, you should discuss it with the user in question. Mango juice talk 21:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

CSD:A7
Hi. :) I came across your speedy deletion tag and I just wanted to point out to you that db-a7 is specifically for people (individually or grouped) and websites. There is currently no consensus for speedily deleting other articles types under this criterion. Other articles that fail to assert notability should go through proposed deletion or articles for deletion. Thanks for keeping an eye out on article quality. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Can I just add to Moonriddengirl's comments, if you are going to add the A7 tag to articles, can you please check the page history before requesting speedy deletion? I noticed you tagged the clearly notable band Atreyu (band) for speedy deletion on notability concerns, but the article had just been vandalised to the version you tagged. I have reverted the vandalism, but if you check the history you should be able to clearly see that an editor who had just been warned for vandalism had just deleted a lot of text from the article. --Canley (talk) 01:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Not to pile on here, because the vast majority of your speedy tags are valid. However, please go back and read the criteria for CSD A1.  The article Jensen 541S was quite clearly not a no context article by Wikipedia definition.  Thanks, Keeper   |  76  21:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Giuliosavo
I was wondering about this. After seeing your note on the above page, I’ll see what I can do to clean it up. — Travis talk  16:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC) '''Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end.'''

A probeto the artical of Agha Zia ud din
Dear

Agha Zia ud din rizvi was considered as a prominent religious clerics in his contemporaries. This statement was ti men again broad casted in Geo Tv, Ptv, Ary, VOA and in Western media as well. And even I can provide evidence from the international news papers, moreover his martyrdom was condemn by the Ex-President of Iran Muhammad Khatimi during a Friday prayer at Tehran University. Moreover he was the more inflencial political and religious figure of Pakistan. On this base i am requesting you to please reactivate my Artical other wise it would be considered as a huge injustice. If not I will request you to provide a sole reason for your rejection.

With Regards

Imran Ali Shah imranglt@gmail.com imranraja86@yahoo.com irfanali700@yahoo.com asif_glt@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imranglt (talk • contribs) 01:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

WTF
Why the hell is my Page deleted? WHY THE FUCKING HELL IS IT DELETED

WHY! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AkatDemonSuki (talk • contribs) 02:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:RFR
Hi - I've just asked for a clarification at the above. Thanks! Pedro : Chat  15:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't worry - it's been granted. Pedro : Chat  16:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Would appreciate your advice...
Looking at your response on his talk page, I think you handled it quite well; it's totally appropriate to delete his comments off of your own talk page if you decide to. I don't think the individual is necessarily a vandal, just someone who needs to realize that this isn't a traditional forum where ridiculous behavior might be tolerated. This was actually the first time I've instituted a 1 hour block, I'm almost always on a heavy side of the banhammer --but something about his edit history said there might be a salvageable member. I've put his talk page on my watchlist, so I'll know if he goes crazy again. BTW, I looked at your userpage after reading your response on his talk page and wasn't surprised to see you're a fellow attorney; again, good response. If he bugs you again, don't hesitate to let me know and I can help out. --Bobak (talk) 18:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Advice
Hi there. You have recently deleted a page I added on the IT service Management providers page - Touchpaper, as advertising. I have been trying to add it for sometime without much success. I understand that Wikipedia is not a site for free advertisting and I do work for Touchpaper but I feel that Touchpaper should be on the vendor list as it has a 6 process Pink Verify Accreditation and is in the Gartner Magic Quadrant, unlike some of the other vendors listed, and therefore a major player in the industry. I have tried to mimic the content on other pages to avoid it being advertising but that hasn't worked. I have left comments on the talk page but this has not been responded to. Would it be possible to get some advice on how I can go about adding a page which is suitable for Wikipedia? Thank you Sarahannlewis (talk) 19:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Thank you for your message, I discovered the advice pages earlier and have since created a page I feel adheres to the guidelines. I hope it meets the required crieria. Thank you for your help Sarahannlewis (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Geeksleep
Hi! I just posted my first article on the topic of "geeksleep". It was deleted and I *think* it said you made that choice. I'm curious as to how it could be amended to remain on the site. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerryjerryjerry (talk • contribs) 20:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Hello. I didn't make a personal attack. I just copied the text from this website and created an article about that. But I agree with the deletion of this article, this time. It was unnecessary and a failure from me. I feel sorry for that. D@rk talk 21:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't think about my action when I created this article. Well, is there a way to let that admin know that I feel sorry for that? I really don't wanna get in serious trouble. D@rk talk 21:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. And I won't do that again, promise. Cheers, D@rk talk 21:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Ahmadpur, Uttar Pradesh
I have removed your prod claiming non notability- real towns and villages are always considered notable. Feel free to nominate for deletion via AfD claiming non existence, Google Maps doesn't seem to have it... J Milburn (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

speedy
Speedy A7 for lack of notability can be used only for the limited number of categories included in WP:CSD. the article Intervention inventory does not fall into any of these. DGG (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I've been to your talkpage before.. Hmm... if an article -- regardless of WP:COI concerns, regardless of length, readability, formatting, or coherency -- asserts notability similarly to the last one that I removed the speedy tag from, then it cannot be speedied by A7. Anything that asserts notability, regardless of whether it asserts it correctly, is not a speedy.  Bring it to AfD.  The most recent example is Built NY Inc.  While I don't think that it would survive an AfD, it is not a speedy.  It claims to have won an award, and therefore deserves to be deleted by consensus.  You tagged it within an hour of creation, and creation by a new user at that.  Have you read WP:AGF and WP:BITE?  I am not an inclusionist, and I think you need to tread slowly on the speedies.  Let me know if you feel I'm off base here.  Keeper   |  76  23:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Di-Gesic
I am sorry that I am at work and hence don't have the time to write a good article on this medical drug. I was looking it up on the internet and noticed that you didn't have an article about it, hence I thought to start one, with the hope that someone else has time to finish it. It is in MIMS hence I would think that it is a relevant drug to list, but that is not my decision to make. Dyinghappy (talk) 04:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Addendum - my mistake - it seems that I wrote it as Digesic by accident. I will redirect, as per Di-Gesic. Dyinghappy (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I'm the author of the article on Krypton Egg and Killerball, and I'm wondering why you are proposing them both to deletion describing them as "Non-notable, unencyclopedic". I know that they are not particularly enriched but they are describing video games which actually exist and should have their place on wikipedia. Furthermore, other articles of the same kind (like impossamole for example) are already displayed on wikipedia and nobody asked for their deletion. Best regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by GuillaumeL75 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

User deleted prod tag
Might recommend an AfD? Scarian Call me Pat 16:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher application
Dear Ukexpat,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Jmlk 1  7  05:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

HYACKs (MN)
This article consisted of text that I did not write. I created a page on a large group called HYACKs, and another contributor added info about another group by the same name in Minnesota. I removed the text from the body of my article and created a new page for it. I guess the page was way too non-notable and I should have left it in a "Other Groups" portion of my page, but it's extremely annoying that you deleted it within hours of posting a Non-Notability Notice. In fact I was still on the computer not even 2 hours later when I came back and the article had already been deleted. You need to at least give the creator time to either remove it or something. Because of your OCD-like deletion, I now have lost that text and cannot recover it (as it was not my info) to place it back in my article. Don't do it again please. Mullins421 (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You've got the wrong guy here, Mullins421. User:Ukexpat is not an admin and does not have the capability of deleting articles.  He simply nominated it.  Another user, an admin User:Irishguy deleted the article.  It was deleted on the grounds of not asserting notability (in other words, why do you feel it belongs in an encyclopedia?).  If you'd like, I repost the information (your work) into your userspace so you can continue to work on it.  That isn't a promise that it would ever make it into the mainspace, just a good faith gesture to give you a chance to prevent you from getting frustrated.  Let me know if you'd like a copy of the article's contents.  I will post this on your talkpage as well.  Keeper   |  <font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76  21:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40
<div style=" border: outset 1px Silver; background-color: Silver; padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; "> <div style=" border: outset 1px DarkGray; background-color: DarkGray; padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; "> <div style=" border: inset 2px white; background-color: GhostWhite; padding: 10px; color: black; "> Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/01/24/episode-40-wikipedias-genetic-makeup/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — <font color="#002BB8">W<font color="#000">ODU P  05:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Removal of Virginia Agricultural and Mechanical College entry
I have nothing against a determination that any information on the Virginia Agricultural and Mechanical College should be included in the entry for Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and thus redirect there. However, I do have a problem with such information being completely wiped in a redirect when the information in the entry exceeds that in the latter's entry. I do not appreciate having to redo the research necessary to document the history of the college. Wiikiwiiki (talk) 12:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Adam Hutchison
Just a friendly heads up on Adam Hutchison. I had to remove your speedy request because there is a claim of notability in the article (Young Scientist of the Year award). However, I can't verify this claim, so I've prodded the article.--Fabrictramp (talk) 19:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

William H. Andrews
Per your suggestion on the talk page, I changed the article to a redirect to William Andrews. This necessitated removing your prod template, but since you made the redirect suggestion, I assumed you wouldn't mind. --SierraSciSPA (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

KarsKormak/Tracker sub page
Thanks! Sorry about that. So to create a sub page, I first:

1) Create a link in my Talk page, such as User:KarsKormak/MyTestPage

2) Click the link to open the new page

3) Edit away

Is this the correct procedure? KarsKormak (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

This isn't right.
Keep my artical, it's just a myth. How ome there can be an artical on Mythology but not on any other myths? It's violating amendment 1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homieg88 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

HYACKs (MN)
I didn't have a problem with your deletion of the article, because as I said, I was merely moving text that someone else added from my article to it's own article. What I did have a problem with was not discussing it or giving me a chance to re-incorporate the text back into my article. You are not entirely at fault, it was mostly the fault of the admin who deleted it an hour later. No harm done, and sorry for any hurt feelings. Mullins421 (talk) 02:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Arnold
How did i vandalize my own article about my dear not friend Arnold.

Runningblader (talk) 06:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
You said that Morpar scape was going to be delete but it's still a growing artical and plus i didn't see a  reason

--Claire Wynn (talk) 21:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
We are talking about a Universal Gazetteer of the early 19th century. I am sure you are not a historian. But it must take into account that when this book was printed there was a very limited  number of Gazetteers in the world. I think this entry should be expanded but not deleted. Why don’t you check in the external link attached and see for yourself what sort of book we are talking about. (text moved)

Hilda Charlton entry
Please put back the entry I just created for Hilda Charlton. I had only written the initial stub and had submitted it only a minute before it was deleted. I was literally in the middle of expanding it before it disappeared. I did not even have the ability to challenge the Rapid Delete entry by putting in the tag that was suggested.

Re: Deletion
I had nothing to do with the deletion concerning IMPACT. It was another user.

Beatrice Fox Auerbach
You said I should not delete a speedy deletion tag "as you did with Beatrice Fox Auerbach" - I do not think I did. What I did remove was a different tag regarding some information I could not prove although I experienced it myself. tmurt

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41
<div style=" border: outset 1px Silver; background-color: Silver; padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; "> <div style=" border: outset 1px DarkGray; background-color: DarkGray; padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; "> <div style=" border: inset 2px white; background-color: GhostWhite; padding: 10px; color: black; "> Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/02/04/episode-41-setting-the-record-straight/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — <font color="#4169E1">W<font color="#191970">ODU P  23:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

questions on making Loring page a stub
Hi Ukexpat,

Thank you for checking out my first article on Ray Loring. I am a new user here and trying to learn the ropes.

I have a couple questiones for you:

-I don't know how to make my page a stub

-I know this man and so how do I inform the reader this is taken from personal conversation?

-The links provided are true sources and can be verified.

Thank you for your help!

Regards,

Chaywood —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaywood (talk • contribs) 01:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Help!
Why is this page being marked for deletion? It follows your guidelines and contains the same information you have allowed for other companies that are competitors of XOTIC PC. The competitors pages are still on wiki. (XOTICPC is the word)

Can you help me correct whatever is wrong so I can post this to your website?

Thank you for your assistance —Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinN6132 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

What the hell?
Why are you guys deleting material as soon as it is written? The information placed here is valid, checks out, and deserves recognition. I'd like to know what the deal is..

Mykal lakim (talk)Mykal_Lakim —Preceding comment was added at 03:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Nishkid
That nishkid is a joke. He keeps deleting my information as soon as it is listed. The information is viable and relates to a business. I'm starting to think Wikipedia discriminates against businesses and their material since i cannot seem to post ANYTHING to this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykal lakim (talk • contribs) 03:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Scottish Theatre Forum
Would you object to my removing the COI tag from Scottish Theatre Forum? I've reworked it and added sources, so it's not in the state it was when you tagged it. --Sturm 11:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for asking -- I have removed it.--ukexpat (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Arkansas Traveler (boat line)
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Arkansas Traveler (boat line). The reason I declined it is because the article is about boats, not the company using them, so it's not subject to CSD A7. For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Critical Practice
Hello

We have every intention of trying to get the article on Critical Practice to conform to wikipedia standards. It is not intended to produce advertsing.

We are still trying--Crtiticalpractice (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Request
I see you wanted my help the other day (on my talk page) - has it all been sorted out now, or do you still want help? Apologies for the delay by the way. Rudget . 14:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Pretty much breaks majority of key policies and guidelines, namely WP:RS, WP:V, WP:COPYVIO, WP:ADVERT etcetera. Rudget . 15:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Xpadder page
Evilalan (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

please give me some advice I made some changes

Some new informations... say to me what is missing on my first article!

xpadder wiki's page
Evilalan (talk) 23:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

please give me some advice I made some changes

Some new informations... say to me what is missing on my first article!

Speedy deletion of Kick!
A tag has been placed on Kick! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 16:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dave best
I have nominated Dave best, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dave best. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gary King (talk) 17:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Respond to Ukexpat
Yep, sorry about that AfD. I opened the article but did not start editing, while you redirected it, so I wasn't aware that it had been redirected. Just disregard the AfD - I have already removed it from the AfD archives :) Gary King (talk) 17:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Kawneer
Can you please assist me in any changes you deem necessary to Kawneer's article. We are trying to write an informational article similar to Kawneer's parent company Alcoa. Any information or examples would be greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Definition 6 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Kawneer
I apologize for my lack of knowledge within Wikipedia. I thought I signed my name? I made some changes to the post, I am not sure what sorts of third party references you are referring to, could you provide me with a business example? I am not trying to be a pain, just want to make sure we meet the requirements necessary.

Thank you Definition 6 (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Blue Chips Investment Club Deletion Request
See my comments on the talk page for Blue Chips Investment Club. AllTheThings (talk) 22:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Triple, double
An editor has nominated Triple, double, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

alix bromley
what is wrong with this article?

all information presented is true and relevant and is is not in reference to a person i know, but a person who is recognised by many people online

--George Chubb (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

re alix bromley
i have tried siting references but they do not appear at the bottom of the page this is my first article and i am unsure about how to use wikipedias editing section

if you could edit the article to stay within accordance to wiki guidelines as website links are within article it would be appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by George Chubb (talk • contribs) 17:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Hilda Charlton sign
--Cminard (talk) 18:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Alix Bromley
did you delete the article then?

so very nice of you well done there destroying the information on the site which claims to host information that may be of interest to anyone —Preceding unsigned comment added by George Chubb (talk • contribs) 18:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Hilda Charlton entry
May I most politely suggest to you that you check the timings for new posts, and give at least some time (more than a minute or two would be nice) before nominating them for speedy deletion, and then suggest to the Administrator that they do the same before deleting the entry after you nominate them. I had no opportunity to enter the tag you suggested to dispute the reason, and now must recreate the entire entry from scratch.--Cminard (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Moving Titles
Hi, I'm writing to you as I see you helped edit the history of the Bloodstaned Memoirs page to make it better. I tried to change the page to simply Bloodstained Memoirs, as I think this would be a more suitable title, as I'm sure people will more likley search the latter than the former. However when I tried to move the page, I was told that title is locked. Do you know why this is, or how to remove the lock. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Commoncase (talk • contribs) 23:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi ukexpat, was just wondering whether you got any further information? Thanks Commoncase (talk) 13:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Inquiry
How do you mark an article as patrolled? Mkdw talk 22:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Joseph Smith and the Origins of the Book of Mormon
I have completed my cut at Joseph Smith and the Origins of the Book of Mormon, and do not believe it should be deleted. You marked it as an article for speedy deletion when I first created it, because I had only put one small phrase in there. Sorry about the confusion - please review and let me know if you disagree. --Descartes1979 (talk) 23:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

About ATN Night Vision article speedy deletion
Hi I browsed Wiki about "Night Vision" I finded hi-quality article Night Vision In this article I fined some references to night vision manufacturer company, for example, ITT_Corporation or Raytheon. In list of night vision manufacturers I finded "American Technologies Network Corporation (ATN) USA" but not finded article about this company. To my opinion, ATN is really good manufacturer of night vision devices for not rich people. I want to create the article about this company and its website. Please specify me a correct way for this purpose.

Thanks Lora Paslova Happy user of ATN Night Storm monocular —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lora Paslova (talk • contribs) 13:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Tangential-not important
I noticed you were at Wadham, and thought I'd say hi. I was there 97-98 as a Sarah Lawrence student.--IronAngelAlice (talk) 16:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Perecman & Fanning
This is my second attempt in trying to add this article. I've even followed how other law firms articles were created. I'm not understanding where I'm not following the guidelines. Could you specify how the article is blatant advertising, rather than send me links to pages on how to edit, I've read them numerous times, edited my article off Wikipedia and got it reviewed by numerous people. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia. (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion SWACHA
Ok, UK ex-pat, I'm new to this. I've tried to remove anything you might have percieved as advertising. I thought the article was pretty straight-forward. Being that there are articles about Automated Clearing Houses and NACHA, I thought it was appropriate to have a regional payments association representated on Wikipedia. Please remove the speedy deletion tag or tell me what else needs to be done. --Gittinsgranado (talk) 20:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Notable/COI Chief Oil and Gas
This article is VERY notable. This company is one of the major players in a little thing called the Barnett Shale. One of the largest natural gas fields in the US. This is a billion dollar company.

As for conflict of interest - How can you tell if I do or don't have a conflict of interest? Guess? How do I get this off the page?

I tried to write this article in the exact same format as other similar articles. SeeDevon Energy and Chesapeake Energy. Please let me know if anything else needs to be done to bring this up to Wikipedia standards. Thanks, --Gittinsgranado (talk) 20:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Chief Oil and Gas/Swacha
Thank you for the quick response. I'm not trying to hide the fact that these organizations are both clients of mine. Why else would I have used the name of my agency as my user name? Thereby making it possible for you to google me. I want to be upfront with my interests. How do I get the COI off? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gittinsgranado (talk • contribs) 21:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
I really appreciate your feedback. --Gittinsgranado (talk) 21:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Beatrice Fox Auerbach
Hello - I was amazed at the speed with which you marked my entry for deletion, but I understand your point. I have added to the entry and have more to add - I hope this is more in line with policy. Any feedback will be appreciated. signed: tmurt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmurt (talk • contribs) 18:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Hillary Flowers Deleted
Sorry! She has done some very important work regarding women empowerment issues and needs to get that recognition. I understand that she needs better press and I have removed her from wikipedia.

--Petebertine (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Hillary Flowers vs. Kuma Games
Thanks UKexpat!

I had been trying to create a page about her design collective, but it got tagged for deletion, so I thought I'd try making one about her instead.

I understand now that I must follow the bio "rules" and I'll use the sandbox, but I must admit be being a bit down cast at the moment.

Several friends have had their careers helped by Hillary Flowers and one of her patrons Cass Amandrahl. I would like these good people to get some recognition from the objective wikipedia point of view. Obviously this will help their careers as well. I don't know if they are really noteworthy people, but I believe them to be good people trying to make a difference who may become noteworthy.

As I thought about what noteworthy means I thought about nasty people out spreading violence and chasing the mighty dollar and the name Kuma Games came up. When I searched for them in Wikipedia and saw their corporate site, I felt less bad for trying to do Ms. Flowers a good turn.

Under the guidelines of noteability, how does an obvious puff piece like the kuma games page get to exist without someone pointing out that they are owned by the largest cigarette comapny in the world and that they had the power to prevent John Stewart from doing a show about them?

Again, I'm just frustrated at having worked for several hours. I promise to finally make use of The Sandbox.

Thanks again for taking the time to have replied and to read this. I'm doing my best to get across that my motives are pure.

Oh and as it is my pattern when my hand gets slapped I have decided to start a war with Kuma Reality Games and expose them as the warmongering puppets that they are. Just wait till I get the DOD report that shows how much they pay Kuma to make their crap.

--Petebertine (talk) 23:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The Griffin Inn
This is one of the first gastro pubs in the UK, it is in the Top Ten pubs in the UK, how can it not be notable and yet pubs of no discernible note such as The Old Surrey Hounds have uncontested articles? By the way its name is 'The Griffin Inn' and not Griffin Inn so why have you moved it?Paste (talk) 18:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for explaining naming guidelines.Paste (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

CreditCovers
CreditCovers is a company which has recieved international attention and is a major consumer trend in over 30 countries. It is a unique product which is widely popular with various demographics. Please advise on how to present facts about this company in a way that would be more appropriate.

Referances to major papers of record were provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ADA1981 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Maserati Coupe redirect
I changed the title because it more accurately reflects the subject matter and provides equal treatment for both the coupe and spyder. Actually, the spyder was the first of the vehicles, the coupe came out later. Spyderman1 (talk) 21:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I see your logic, but think of the person looking for info on the Coupé -- they will search for "Maserati Coupé" not for "Maserati Coupé / Spyder". Similarly for the Spyder. In any event at the moment the Maserati Coupé article is not a redirect and it has some discussion on the talk page that will be a little hard to find if it is redirected to the new article. – ukexpat (talk) 21:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I have all versions of Maserati Coupe redirected, with or without the accented é so everyone will get taken there just like they did for Maserati Spyder. I had looked at the discussion page, but the only thing on it of substance was about a mistatement in a prior version that the coupe/spyder was the first Maserati to feature a normally aspirated V8, and this was corrected sometime ago - but no discussion worth maintaining a history of. In any event, perhaps I should have used the "move" function - does that move discussion as well? Spyderman1 (talk) 21:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 42
Hey there. Just this note that Wikipedia Weekly Episode 42 is out.

You can download the episode or listen to the streaming audio at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/03/03/episode-42-the-question-of-muhammad-the-wikiand-everything/, and you can hear past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/ too.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP (talk) 21:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Fine print: You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you no longer wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from that list.

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi and Thanks
Cheers and thank you for all of your help,guidance, and clean up. I plan on contributing to the Lotus cars, wine, film, music, computer topics as I become better at this ! This is a lot of fun but there are many rules to learn ! Wismer2008 (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Proffiliates deletion
This is not meant as an advertisement but rather an entry and listing about an important company in the Email Marketing space. This company has been instrumental and well-known in this industry for many years and seems worthy of having an entry in Wikipedias' directory. There do seem to be other companies in this same industry with comparable pages...some may have been tagged for seeming advertorial but are all still up and live. At the least, are there any guidelines you can provide to fix this page so it can remain live? There is no intention to advertise here and thus any and all necessary changes will gladly be made if you can help with some guidance. Cheers. Mkoch38 (talk) 18:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Douglas Hill horn
A tag has been placed on Douglas Hill horn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Kevin McKenzie
Good day, Ukexpat. Thank you for your recent advice regarding appropriate titles for articles. I must tell you that it was I who started the entry: Kevin McKenzie (ballet dancer), and I thought it both succint and sufficient. I could also have titled it: Kevin McKenzie (director) but opted for the former.

After starting this article, I came upon an existing one, that someone else started, titled Kevin McKenzie (ballet dancer/choreographer/artistic director). While this other title certainly describes the man, I too thought it too long but was uncomfortable that I had started my own simple one when this one was already out there, though curously not linked to a single other article. If it had been, I would have discovered it through my ABT article in the first place.

Please change it back to my Kevin McKenzie (ballet dancer) if you wish. I unfortunately do not have time or expertise to do so. Queenofthewilis (talk) 13:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

help me please
Thank you for your message, Wikipedia it is nice but for me a little bit complex because i am new user then i might have many question to ask you and also my english not so good. so how i can do my page of Franco Angeloni (artist)beucase it said This article is uncategorized. Please categorize this article to list it with similar articles. (March 2008)

then i dont know how to do it also when i creat only name it seem not allow me but i know you can write biography of the person who still alive.

Please give me some advice thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelnight (talk • contribs) 14:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Life Union
Hi, i notice you put recommendation for Life Union article deletion. This is a correct and accurate proposed government enhancement for european union, african union, uset, other type of union systems. what do you suggest for enhamcement of this article as i have started articles before such as cotillion, debutante, DJ Colette, and a few others. i am serious with this article yet maybe i do not have the most updated programming techniques, what do you advise to enhance my programming language for this article, sources, and other things i am not thinking about. Joshua 12:28 pm, March 6, 2008 (ETC) User talk:amovrvs

editing the article is an option for more reference material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amovrvs (talk • contribs) 18:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Correlazione
I know it sounds wrong, but choreographers really say that they "made" a ballet. Robert Greer (talk) 22:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

thank you
Thank you for the undo! Robert Greer (talk) 01:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

article modified
Ukexpat, thanks for your feedback. I've revised an article to reflect Wikipedia guidelines. Does it get re-evaluated? If so, will the db spam tag be removed by an admin? Access2justice4all (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Banking (Special Provisions) Bill.html
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. 21:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

A new Oxbridge user box
Ukexpat...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 16:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Please give it a good look. It is a work in progress. I understand how you identify with your college first. The template takes that into account. See the usage. :) - LA @ 17:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * To use it, you copy the code next to the box, and you put that code on your user page when the box is done, which it is not. There is still a lot of work before it is ready. If you have any other questions, please ask them here and not on my talk page. - LA @ 20:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fund Raising Instructions
An article that you have been involved in editing, Fund Raising Instructions, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Fund Raising Instructions. Thank you. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 01:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Claus Pedersen
Why did you delete MyHoliday.com company description??

Claus Pedersen (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please see my answer on my talk page.

Claus Pedersen (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Updated

Claus Pedersen (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Would you please comment on my last note on my talk page?

Claus Pedersen (talk) 18:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Sudar 4edi
I'm sorry for deleting the notice that you put. I'm gald to share my knowladge with world. I recreated smdns Project. Hope you let me to share the knowladge with others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudar 4edi (talk • contribs) 15:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

List of basic Canada topics
This is a basic topics list, so it should be kept under the policy. <font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#ba313c"> STORMTRACKER  <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#0d2b56"> 94  Go Sox! 19:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Matt Catingub
I do not understand, please explain. Thank you. Coconut Info —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.179.147 (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Spammy?

This is a free service and nowhere in the article there was a call for action, just trying to describe functionality through plain fact statement. The site put together on $0 budget attracted thousands of members in a matter of year without any advertising effors. As of March, International Crew and Talent members got a chance to join too. Talk to those people and see what they think. I am planning to place links to a few Union member profiles featured on Wikipedia.

Yes, it is not a venture funded enterprise and does step on the toes of the sites trying to offer similar services but for a fee. This is true service to the industry with the highest unemployment rate.

Give me a chance to put it together before you jump to another swift cliche ruling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slatecast (talk • contribs) 14:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

List of basic Canada topics
Did some work on it. Is it good enough to keep yet? The Transhumanist 00:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice work -- I will withdraw the AfD nom. – ukexpat (talk) 00:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. By the way, to withdraw your nom, you need to go to Articles for deletion/List of basic Canada topics and make a statement to that effect.  Again, thank you.  And I'm glad I could improve the list to your satisfaction.  The Transhumanist  01:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Help
I added articles of reference for Chief oil & Gas and made copy changes. What else needs to be done. The Penn State group uses these sites for meetings and wanted this information out there. thanks70.255.222.98 (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Why delete the article 'art for sale'?
The article does as far as I can determine meet all the requirements that are sited as objections. Firstly, the game ‘Art for Sale’, although it seems to be new has been cited on a few gaming forums. Secondly it can be verified that the game exists by going to the sited reference an downloading the game and must therefore a reliable source. Both the webpage and game should merit the inclusion of the article as the existence can be verified and there should not be any objection. In addition the game can also be found by searching for it on the net.

Robroy865 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robroy865 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Guerra C. N. Freitas
Then just find the page again -- it might be http://www.sharecircle.org/edirector.html and tag it for deletion as copyvio. I should have checked myself. DGG (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
Yeah I guess your right, sorry about that one. But would it not be a bit tedious to go to a page, then have to go to a redirected page? Sorry again. Tool-apc (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
Yeah I guess your right, sorry about that one. But would it not be a bit tedious to go to a page, then have to go to a redirected page? Sorry again. Tool-apc (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

???
lol i dont care if u delete it, honestly. <font color="#00CCFF">elisa <font color="#000000">talk. 13:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * oh, yeah, wow thanks, i didnt even see that lol <font color="#00CCFF">elisa <font color="#000000">talk. 13:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Apologies
Yes, sorry! I typed the wrong url in my browser and didn't notice until I had already edited the pages, they were meant to be on my user space. I have emptied those pages now if they could be deleted that'd be great! Thanks! &mdash; Cpt Helia (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

help
i dont want it the account i created deleted it took a lot of time to create so please just help edit it to get it up to par, I really dont know all the rules to this site but i want to be within guideline

thanks

RJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimania08 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Chez Paul deletion nomination banner?
Hi,

I was wondering who takes down the "This article is being considered for deletion..." banner at the top of the Chez paul page? Yes, anyone can, I supposed, but I don't tend to edit the "fancy stuff" in wikipedia because I'm such a lowly nube. And I wasn't certain that your withdrawl was enough.

Also, did I screw up the capitalization of the name, i.e. lower-case "p" in Paul? It should be upper case. Is that easy to fix or is there a weird, MS-Word like decapitalizer running that I don't know about? I may have just fat-fingered it initially. Can I (do I have the ability/authorization to) fix it? Thanks Will Hughes (talk) 20:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hey, former-UK-person, just wanted to say thanks for putting so much time into Wikipedia. It's obvious from your user page that you're one of the senior, veteran people that have made Wikipedia great. Hope you hear this enough! Will Hughes (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

How do you do that? Give up the mojo!
Expat,

Where do you get all these cool tools for your user-page? Like the widget at the top of your page that says "Leave me a message?" It's a 'messagebar' ? Is that something you created and haven't generified for the public? How about your status bar? I see other people doing it but no info on any of the general help pages. Is there a list somewhere of publicly available widgets? I think I found the template you started with under Template:New message but can't seem to modify it to work for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whughes98144 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Good Morning, I apprecciate very much your work and I hope that the page will not delete. Anyone I am looking for insert reference and text. Thank you!!--Hegels (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointers!
UKExpat, you can do advanced Latin and Greek, went to Oxford and you're a lawyer? As we say in the States .... DUUUUUUDE! (And I'm not even Californian.) And a grammarian! Love it. Thanks much for the pointers to the higher-tech stuff. I did eventually find the page on templates and figured out the message entry but for a senior software engineer with a physics background it took me a while. That's a generic problem with wikis: great for data entry, horrid for organization. Wikipedia does well because so many people keep watch, but still. Somewhere between the search and the table-of-contents is a big gap in the how-to documentation.

What part of this great nation did you end up in? As you can tell from username, I'm a Seattle resident and having grown up in Michigan and lived or visited at least every region of this country, here is best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whughes98144 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Daniel Hunt- actor born in Norwich, Norfolk
Hi UKexpat. I noticed you've done an edit to the above article. I think it could be a spoof. There is no mention of him on IMDB website. Your thoughts please Northmetpit (talk) 12:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Georgios Toubalidis
Why is the Georgios Toubalidis page up for deletion...??The-Real-ZEUS (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * So if i was to provide a source that he was president, would that be ok or would it still be up for deletion..?The-Real-ZEUS (talk) 16:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If thats the case then shouldnt these pages be deleted Pedro Parages, Juan Padrós, Julián Palacios..??The-Real-ZEUS (talk) 16:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I still dont get why it should be deleted...Wikipedia is an encyclopedia fo people to learn stuff off or stuff they didnt know about...lets just say some guy saw the name Georgios Toubalidis in a newspaper and he didnt know who he was..he could go on wikipedia type in Georgios Toubalidis and it would say that he was the fourteenth president of AEK Athens F.C. who he succeeded and who he was suceeded by..you know what i mean?The-Real-ZEUS (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * OK..i cant do anything to keep it from being deleted... but just out of curiosity...why are you not putting the Real Madrid presidents up for deletion..??The-Real-ZEUS (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough...thank you for your timeThe-Real-ZEUS (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Daniel Hunt
Hi

Yes I have listed Daniel Hunt on the site as he a director/actor that I have worked with on a number of occasions. his main area is theatre but he also works as a director and playwright. Sorry if you feel that his credits may not be worthy. Just thought that it might be a handy additional reference to website. My poinr of reference is lifted from some programmes of shows that he appeared in the West End. Best wishes

Graham —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purdey (talk • contribs) 17:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

On Galt
I have requested that I finish the page by putting a hang-on tag at the top to show you notability. 69.3.194.198 (talk) 04:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 02:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:UAA
When reporting usernames to WP:UAA, please use user-uaa, not userlinks. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip -- I use Twinkle for UAA reporting so I guess it is applying the incorrect template. I will ask the writer of the script to update it. – ukexpat (talk) 14:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I see you have already made the request - thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Frobenius solution to the hypergeometric equation
I'm puzzled about why you added a proposed deletion tag to Frobenius solution to the hypergeometric equation. The article clearly neglected Wikipedia's usual conventions and needed a lot of work (and still does, although it's on its way). But that's not a reason to delete the article; that's a reason to improve it. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

early afd
are you aware you nominated Patient and Mortuary Neglect for deletion just 17 minutes after the article was started, while it was clear from the outline on the page that it was still being worked on and that there was a place for references. I want to give you a chance to withdraw your afd for now; if the article stays as it is, that of course is another matter. DGG (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You're fortunate...mine was deleted less than 1 minute after I had submitted it.--Cminard (talk) 23:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Wasn't my article, I'm just a friendly admin trying to remind a fellow admin of a possible oversight. Cminard, if you have a published 3rd party source, feel free to rewrite it. It shouldn'tstrictly speaking be necessary, but it does help to put a little more than one sentence in on the first edit. DGG (talk) 23:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I am not actually an admin, just a (maybe over-) enthusiastic new page patroller... – ukexpat (talk) 00:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I understand you nominated the article for deletion, but this is a group project that has to be uploaded one section at a time. I would appreciate it if you could give my group until friday to make such a request. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kellyorr1 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you, DGG, I shall do so. It was a full-fledged stub, and although the message on my talk page said I could put in a tag to ask for consideration to avoid speedy deletion, I was not even given the time to put in the tag to request that it stay.--Cminard (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Reply concerning the article about "Sebastin Champappilly"
In the article titled "Sebastian Champappilly" you had send a reply suggesting the only those authors can be featured who are "Famous" and that Dr. sebastian champappilly was insignificant. I would just like to say that Dr. Sebastian Champappilly is an authority on Christian Law in India,this has been judicially recogonized in various reported judgements of the High Court of Kerala.Furthermore Dr.Sebastian Champappilly is the First Indian to secure a Doctorate in Christian Personal Law. I have also made appropriate changes to the artilce like add external links and a few Internal links. HolyFist (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

"Sebastian Champappilly"
I have edited the article titled "Sebastian Champappilly", citing Reference and a few more links. I noticed you have added the photograph.Hence I thank you for all your help and assistance.If there is anything else that is required please let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HolyFist (talk • contribs) 16:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Bryan Broadcasting Article
I did not intend to remove the speedy deletion tag from the Bryan Broadcasting Company article however, I did update just after you added the tag without knowing which may have removed the tag. I intend to contest your proposed deletion and would appreciate it if you could give me some advice on how to make an article that you will not delete.

Andrewdjarrett (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Christian Law of Succession in India
I want to thank you for your help in the "Sebastian Champappilly" article .I recently made an article titled "Christian Law of succession in India".If it is not too much trouble can you please go throught it and give me a few suggestons to improve the article.

Regards, HolyFist (talk) 05:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I created a page? proximity1.
If I created a "user page" for proximity1, the first was inadvertent. Then, reading the header notes, I did decide to create a user page, as it read, 'this page should be created by the user 'proximity1'. Correct? Proximity1 (talk) 20:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Proximity1 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion: Retroglo
I have made revisions to the Retroglo page. I completely understand your issues with the page and hope that my revisions will be sufficient. I would appreciate if you would review the new article and let me know how else I can improve it.Debmorais (talk) 20:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)debmorais

Speedy Deletion of Bryan Broadcasting
That is all fine and dandy except that I am the administrator of the WTAW website... Andrewdjarrett (talk) 21:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illinois corn flake
Just thought you might want to know that two users have shown a fair amount of news coverage on the Illinois Corn Flake™. I still think it's more newsy than encyclopedic, but I thought you might wanna take a look at it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to rewrite the article from scratch, but I'm having a hard time. What do you think I should do? Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyedit request
Any chance you feel in the mood to copyedit Max Mosley (son of the famous fascist leader, and head of motorsport's world governing body)? It's at WP:FAC at present, and copyediting has been requested by one of the reviewers. Thanks in advance. Don't worry if you don't have the time (I'm a volunteer at WP:PRV myself, so I know the potential pressures), but if you are stuck for time, could you let me know and I'll go bug someone else. ;-) Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 17:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's not too long, you'll be pleased to hear! 4u1e (talk) 19:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * FAC nixed due partly to various copyedit concerns, but more to the recent 'Nazi sex orgy' allegations from the News of the World. Headline writer's dream, I should think. Anyway, it's probably not worth bothering now, since we're likely to see some instability for a while. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 09:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

food channel
Understood - my error as a novice. I thought I was deleting it in good faith since it apparently had problems. I put a revision up and added the hang on tag, I think. I have read all the materials but a lot of the formatting is new to me and I welcome any help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foodtrends (talk • contribs) 21:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Scott Larned
I have declined the speedy deletion request on Scott Larned. As a member of a group that is generally considered notable, Mr. Larned is also notable. - Philippe &#124; Talk 21:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ay, there's the rub. In the past, I've come across folks who vigorously argue both sides of that debate.  I tend to take a more "middle of the line" road on it.  I've seen policy bounce back and forth a little back on that, and my general gut instinct is to - like with with AfDs - default to "keeping" the article unless there's a strong reason not to.  In this case, it's a pretty notable band, and he's a pretty large part of it, so I'm erring toward the side of "keep".
 * It's important to point out, though, that my leaning to "keep" on Speedy Delete doesn't mean a whole lot in the grand scheme of things: it just means that in this case I don't believe it's a sufficiently blatant violation of notability policies to delete it immediately. I don't think it's doing immediate damage to the encyclopedia.  If it were to go to AfD, and I saw that the consensus there was to delete, I'd hit the button with a great deal of certainty.  I just don't think it necessary to hit it with a speedy delete. - Philippe &#124; Talk 22:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Usage of rescue in mainspace
Greetings, I saw your comment on Articles for deletion/Illinois corn flake and thought I would let you know that consensus has changed to allow the rescue to be used in mainspace. If you have any questions regarding this please feel free to contact me or leave a post on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page. - Fosnez (talk) 09:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Changes to BCC Research
Hi, I've updated a few things on my talk page and would appreciate it if you could help my article meet the requirements for Wiki acceptance. ThanksStuartfost (talk) 16:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Ukexpat,

Thanks for getting back at me. I'm also interested in adding market information to some of the topics that my company covers and using the report as a source. Is this looked down upon or is it actually encouraged? The data comes from analysts/press releases relevant to the field of study/article. Hope to hear from you as fast again, so far the advice you have given has been most helpful.Stuartfost (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Request for page unprotection
These requests for page unprotection should be done quickly.

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

semi-protect. I should make some edits. Pinoybandwagon (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Georgios_Toubalidis
Actually I did not close that discussion. I did add the bottom template since someone had left this off. I thought this was the one affected but apparently it was one earlier on this date. I have removed the bottom template so you can relist without concerns. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Emma Burgess
i dont understand why you want to delete this artcle, can you please explain? she is a real person, valid artist. why wouldnt you want that on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaedenmas (talk • contribs) 20:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Friendly suggestion
Hi. Just wondering if you've ever considered archiving portions of your talk page? It's entirely up to you, but it would make it easier/faster for other users to read or leave comments for you. -Cheers, --- Taroaldo (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi. The two archive bots I would suggest taking a look at are MiszaBot III or ClueBot III. Installation/template/parameter information is on the linked pages. Hope this helps! --- Taroaldo (talk) 23:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

YAehm
speedy delete on hancock prospecting. please provide your reasons a bit better than that. long experienced editor (check my details) something else - or are you geographically challenged - tis the richest company in australia  - hope you have a sense of humour - you must be on the same sutff that i am on :|  SatuSuro 13:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

A friendly note - try something other than oggle, and try the company and see its relevance - and then even try clusty - and see who it is linked to. thats about csd 7 as george bush in australian terms - cheers SatuSuro 13:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

OK - so you are in perhaps the most invidiuous situation where we revert your messages and I havent in fact in the stub sufficiently asserted the notability and i note you send a mesage to my friend first. I will endeavour to add a few comments - notability of a company such as this one is common knolwedge and i must apologise if i take on the australian brashness at such ignorance of the commonplace here in australia as to os'ers limited understanding. I understood that the whole thing of csd 7 is for where a new user or a limited experience editor - surely a simple talk page item that was less oficious could have sufficed? it certainly would have generated a more pleasant tone on my part - :) SatuSuro 14:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

OK so you have a problem with notability - I would check an ed out before looking at the article - does it look like im a one hit wonder? ok patience brother SatuSuro 14:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough - if you work that way I wish you well - I personally from my expeieence would never venture into speedy delete with any article that i saw a project tag, category, applied - regardless of what else - specially in the first half hour of being created - this all smells of legalistic readings of how it works - if you wish to do so - fair enough you have every right to do it that way -  I work differently and I think we should respect that we all make mistakes - I never would have thought that notability should be challenged so quickly when it was clear i was still editing - I think that in the australian project we sometimes wait days for that to eventuate. As for the other editor - he clearly knows - from the other side of australia - that just the hancock family mention is sufficient proof of notability - maybe not in fine details for out of australia editors - but for australian based editors - just mention of the father and daughter spells billions SatuSuro 14:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to aggravate mate - me late mum came from alderley edge and i think i have a sense of where you are coming from with seeing the stub - but hey - i sometimes wait months for responses to issues in the indonesian and tamsanian wikiprojects - the speed sort of gets me saying the wrong things sometimes - hey thanks for cleaning up my mess - and hey I owe you one sometime - the mining companies of western australia are very under-articled by the way - billions literally worth to their owners and the state -and we local editors cant even get a good range of articles up about them - cheers SatuSuro 14:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

wee cross messaged again - hey thanks again - ill try to less aggravate if there is a next time :) - and yes sometimes notability is not that obvious first off SatuSuro 14:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I must say I am very proud of fellow australian editors and their cricket work - my 17 year old used to be heavily into playing soccer but he's got into computer games a bit too much recently - but I always livve in hope that he will get back to it - hey cheers from a cold western australia (for a change) until next time :) SatuSuro 14:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Hiring Conference deleteion
The information I posted regarding a hiring conference is reference material for transitioning military members. Hiring Conferences are general in nature and not commonly known about. They're an effective means to honor the people that serve our country. The information is not advertisement and there is no reference to a particular company. I request that you withdraw your recommendation for deletion. Jkoranda —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkoranda (talk • contribs) 15:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Adam Heether
Actually, as of the time I saw the article, you were right, and I should have allowed the speedy -- but the article author is now asserting in the AFD discussion that Heether was named to a minor-league all-star team. So I'm inclined to just let the AFD play out. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Test PokerStars
I think we were both entering the tags at the same time.Daltxn (talk) 20:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Charles J. O'Byrne
I've responded over at Talk:Charles J. O'Byrne, also, the article is a bit more in depth then a few hours ago. Let me know what you think. MrPrada (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, I'd appreciate that whenever you have time. Copy-editing is not one of my strong points. MrPrada (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * BTW, not sure if you're a member of the League of Copyeditors, but it would be great when you're done if you can leave the banner stamp of approval, that will help in future peer reviews, GA submissions, etc. MrPrada (talk) 18:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Sesquipedaliophobia
Point taken. Though, I am currently looking for third party psychological resources on sesquipedaliophobia - they're just a royal bitch to find.

Lord knows there is an abundance of web fizzle about hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia, but that isn't actually the medical term (and frankly, most of what people have to say about it is absolute bullshit).

Feel free to help me look for something. If you want.

Otherwise, I can't argue with your reasoning - it does just look like a definition... But I'm trying.

TheDefiniteArticle (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Peer review assistance requested
I started a peer review at WikiProject video games for The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. If you could copyedit it or put in any other suggestions, I'd appreciate it: WikiProject_Video_games/Peer_review. Thanks! <b style="color:midnightblue; font-family:Trebuchet MS;">Voyaging</b><sup style="color:teal;">(talk) 01:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Ba-Ba-Bankrobbery
I was a little disappointed when you nominated this article for deletion. It has only been put here because I felt it was a little messy in the main Erste Allgemeine Verunsicherung article and was better off in it's own one. It is a non-notable single however the information is there for whoever wants to read it. This article explains a little as to why it was a non-notable singel as well. --Cexycy (talk) 14:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Ia there anyway you can reconsider this and what can I do to argue to my case?

Ba-Ba-Bankrobbery
Have you read my arguement for keeping this article? I really do not see how the chart position of a song makes it non-notable. Some bands like Led Zeppelin did not release singles at all. --Cexycy (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

re:Enigma Titanium Limited
Speedy deletion is for non-controversial deletion of articles which almost anyone would agree needs to be deleted. When I said that "Other [similar] stuff exist" I only meant to say that this seems to be an area that many seem to think is notable, and is therefore not speediable. In general, if I can imagine a good faith editor who is aware of the relevant policies recommending to keep in an AFD I am very hesitant to speedy. While I have no opinion on whether it is notable or not, the fact that there are many other similar articles implies to me that there needs to be a wider community discussion on the topic. This does not directly relate to the A7 criteria (notability), but rather to an overall view of how speedy deletion should work. Also, I am not saying that "other stuff exists" is a reason to keep in a AFD, but I would say that it is a strong reason not to speedy.

In regards to the question of notability, I think that A7 is perhaps the hardest to decide when it does and doesn't fit (with perhaps G11 a close second). While article like "Bob is great; he can fly" should obviously be deleted, "Bob is a famous pilot" is not as clear cut. In my view there has to a point where an article should be nominated for deletion in an AFD for lacking notability, yet still not be speedable. It is unimaginable that there would be no community discussion on the topic of notability, and articles are either speedied or kept.

I hope this explains my actions, if you have any further questions don't hesitate to ask. Jon513 (talk) 00:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

HighwallMining --> Highwall mining
I moved the article name. Consensus is better than your or my opinion alone; good call. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Author has blanked the page, and asked for deletion on its talk page. Shall I, or do we feel it is a legitimate topic? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi there!
Hi there! I've recently added the article S Club for FAC, however, I have a conflicting LOCE request from way back in January that seems to be getting no where. I was just wondering if it would be possible for you to look through the article for me and copyedit it? It'd be really appriciated if you could. Thanks - ǀ Mikay ǀ  18:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That would be fantastic. I'm away for a few days this week anyway, so will probably only be able to get onto Wiki a couple of times. So that's ideal. :) Thanks so much. - ǀ Mikay ǀ  19:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Are you and Macy maried?
cause you should be you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tito44 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Sorry, It won't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tito44 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Tibet Region
The reason that I prodded instead of redirecting is that I thought that "Tibet Region" sounded like an odd thing that someone would type if he or she was looking for Tibet instead. You can still redirect it to Tibet if you want. There is no hard in having it as a redirect. <font color="orange" face="comic sans ms">Captain <font color="red" face="Papyrus">panda  01:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Transcend Media Group
Hi there, saw your comments on the  Transcend Media Group page and have attempted to rewrite in a neutral fashion. I am a bit green to Wiki so you'll have to excuse me if i have misunderstood. Do I now delete your comments, how does it work?

Many thanks,

--Sevenson (talk) 08:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Jerry Covington problems
These all appear to be the same user: Shall we request a checkuser or is there some other way you'd like to proceed? Qworty (talk) 17:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * user:Covingtons
 * user:BanThisNameillMake10More
 * user:75.127.109.26
 * user:68.93.183.59
 * user:Random667
 * Thanks. I've taken it to AN/I.  You may wish to comment over there:  Qworty (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Covington's Customs
I do not work for this covingtons, i am just a fan of their work. They are a motorcycle manufacturer, so they should be listed in the motorcycle manufacturer section. The owner is jerry covington who was featured on the biker build off on the discovery channel.

I can not see why this is being deleted. and others like this one for example are not: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ridley_Motorcycle_Company —Preceding unsigned comment added by Random667 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

thanks for your help on my article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by It is me i think (talk • contribs) 19:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Indy & Wich
An article that you have been involved in editing, Indy & Wich, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Indy & Wich. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...!
Days like this make me wish I hadn't given up my own admin rights. This blatant sockpuppetering just frosts me. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I had seen the discussion over the last few days, filed it over at AIV and it was suggested that I do a sockpuppet report, which I tried to do. The formatting is nearly impossible to comprehend, but I did my best.  My page should be at the top of the list, but it isn't showing up on the index.  Man, am I glad you're here!  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Good idea. I had that on my old user account and it worked great. In the meantime, this is getting really ugly over at the talk page and I can't stay online much longer. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Whew...what a mess. Strange case. Thanks for the help! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I saw that; thanks again. I've tried extending something of an olive branch to the guy. His mistakes involved his choice of username and the block-evading socks. Ironic, since a username block can be so easily lifted. Gotta run, but I'll tune in later on. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Vladimir Yuriznov Jr.
I removed the speedy tag on this article, since the article does make a claim to notability (ie, head coach of a team in the Finnish pro ice hockey league.) I don't know much about hockey, though, so I wouldn't stop you from taking it to AFD. Zagalejo^^^ 19:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

image: Dr. Mani Menon.jpg
This is in reference to image: Dr. Mani Menon.jpg. This is a departmental image and the photographer has given us authority to use it. What extra information is needed in order to prove that this image is taken with full rights?

Thanks, sciencefirst —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sciencefirst (talk • contribs) 20:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The Covington's Customs article
The Covington's Customs article, even though it is only a redirect, should be moved to Covington's Cycle City Otherwise the Covington's Customs article should be removed completely as that is an inaccurate title. The official name of their shop is "Covington's Cycle City" not "Covington's Customs".

Also, Covington's Cycle City is a recognized manufacturer in the USA and should be listed as such. They are listed in the NADA under "Covingtons Cycle City": http://www.nadaguides.com/default.aspx?LI=1-23-38-5692-0-0-0&l=1&w=23&p=38&f=5694&gc=MC&gtc=MC&m=0072&y=2008&ml=C And in the kelly Blue Book under "Covington": http://www.kbb.com/KBB/Motorcycles/Retail_2007_Covington.aspx 76.205.186.30 (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Bestival 2008
Do you have a take on expected future events like this concert-ival? I tried to redirect but the new user was adamant, siting other similar articles. Do you know where there is a consensus? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * As with IRL mops, it does get sloppy at times. The comment about deleting all iterations of a user page is something I've never seen before.  How does one handle this? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, him. Not worth dragging through the mud, as he seems to have sulked away.  Also, I'm not actually offended by sod.  When I have enough money to buy a house, I intend to redo my lawn with it.  (If you're British, does that sound vulgar?) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It's kind of like someone calling me a cracker. Being Yankee born and bred, my response is, "Um, okay."  Similarly, I don't mind discussions of bloody messes found at crime scenes, though I'd have to be careful with my much more proper British friends, describing something I saw on CSI as a "blood-covered mess". :-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Luckey Platt
Thank you. Turns out I had forgotten to put in the URL. Sort of essential for a web cite, actually.

Glad you enjoyed the article. Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

moss bros
alright then ill have a look at it, cheers!

bensquash 1990 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bensquash1990 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop ?
I would prefer it if you did not have my contribution page on your watchlist. You have a pattern of making changes on new pages I create, and it's creepy. Some of the changes you make are good, and I appreciate it. Nevertheless. And in the case of Guth v. Loft I think politics really is quite relevant to what goes in the law. And therefore if judges are affiliated to a party it's important, because it shapes their approach. So, mate, his dad is important, and I'm putting it back.  Wik idea  18:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm still suspicious. It's happened to me before, with some rather sinister Republican characters. I take you at your word - actually I shouldn't have said so.  Wik idea  19:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

moss bros
ahh magic! cheers mate

~bensquash1990~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bensquash1990 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Cause To Love You
First you could start to tell me why you listed this article for deletion an then maybe you coul help me to improve the article so it can meet the standards because I only want to give as much information as I can in some places were information is lacking like in this case. Expect to hear from you mate. ~Horror_Punk_Ed22~

~Horror_Punk_Ed22~

Well I'll give a look in to that but I was expecting a little more of help, other admins have been more helpful. Sorry about signing with your talk page it was a copy paste error. Don overreacr saying it vandalism it was just a mistake and you know I kinda green here and human beings commit mistakes.

Horror_Punk_Ed22 (talk) 20:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

editing steve pyke page
Hi there, This is the first page I've done, and I'd like some help with formatting it, and also adding external links and maybe an image. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoyobee (talk • contribs) 20:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm done with my initial edits, and I've taken note of your recommendations to preview before saving and define edits. Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoyobee (talk • contribs) 10:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi there, you asked me to let you know when I was done with my initial edits -- not sure if I'm leaving this in the right place! Yoyobee (talk) 11:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)yoyobee

Blåbär
The edits that the original creator of the article keeps trying to make are largely complete rubbish that add little to the article. But I did check when this came up on RC patrol and the drink does appear to have some notability. I am trying to keep the rubbish clear of the article for long enough for it to survive RC patrol. Feel free to take it to AfD if you disagree. -- Roleplayer (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Goon of Fortune Deletion
I understand that my article on Goon Of Fortune may have not been notable or encyclopediatic, but since there are existing articles on Drinking Games, I thought that this would be a valid contribution. Could you please explain why it was deleted on the grounds of being unnotable and none of the other Drinking Games were deleted on the same basis? Sony doraemon (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision3 and its podcasts
Hi. I saw that you put db-web on some of the Revision3 podcast articles which I had tagged as unreferenced. I had considered doing that myself but I was daunted by the scale of the whole Revision3 edifice (complete with template) on Wikipedia and I didn't want to chip away at it. On reflection, my thought is that it looks like a walled garden of non-notable articles of the type decried in WP:CB. Only the main article looks likely to be justifiable. What do you think? Is there a case for killing the whole lot off? If so, how should it be done. Is it fair to put db-web on each article or does it need to go to a grand, multi-article, AfD? --DanielRigal (talk) 13:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Is this you?
Hi, err just out of curiosity, is this you? – ThatWikiGuy (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's me. Signed up this morning. – ukexpat (talk) 00:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool, I will give you rollback privileges on it then. How did you find out about it? – ThatWikiGuy (talk) 09:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I saw you mention it somewhere else on WP, maybe on one of the talk/help pages? – ukexpat (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You don't seem to actually edit there. – ThatWikiGuy (talk) 22:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, haven't had the time yet. – ukexpat (talk) 22:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Martin Postle
Earlier you put comments and suggestion on my article about Martin Postle, an art historian in the UK. I have expanded the article and have included many references. I was looking to get you feedback on the progress I am making on my article. I am still new to wikipedia, so any advice, good or bad, is appreciated. thanks so much. It is me i think (talk) 19:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Christopher Tsai
Author (and subject) still removing tags. I've reinstated and warned. Paste (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of article
Please consult talk section for The Young Muslims UK usayd (talk) 20:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Snow King
I removed the tag because the reason it was tagged wasit didn't have enough content. I added I little and removed the tag. If you want to tag it as non-notable go ahead, but now it has content. Editorofthewiki 09:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: 4FrontSecurity
The assertion is enough to keep it out of speedy but it may not hold up in AFD. The criteria states that the article only has to suggest notability, not prove it. --Michael Greiner 10:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

re:tyy
I have responded on my talk page. Jon513 (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging
Hello Ukexpat. Please be careful not to bite newcomers by being overly aggressive in tagging articles for speedy deletion. Your recent tagging of this version of the Zero Visibility Corps is the surest way to drive off newcomers and anger veterans. Clearly, the article did claim some notability: a 12-year old dance company with annual shows and plenty of Google references if you bother to check. A quick look at the author's contribs shows a strong interest and expertise in contemporary dance. Please consider doing routine checks like these before tagging articles. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 17:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Bamba
Twinkle didn't finish this AfD for you; I fixed it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I don't know the first thing about bots. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Collabtive
It seemed to assert notability, so I decide not to speedy delete it. The AfD was a good step. -- Maxim (talk)  23:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Balance Consulting
Please review the article above and remove any issue tags that you feel have been resolved. Thanks, Rsmcphail (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Smackin' Isaiah - Get Eaten Alive
Hi, I don't understand why you have proposed the deletion of the Smackin' Isaiah page regarding their "Get Eaten Alive" cassette release. All the information I have included is factual... can you please explain? Thanks Jobsagoodun (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

How It Should Have Ended
I have just started the article please give me time to work on it and please remove the prod.<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#7D0008"> King <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#FFBE26"> Rock Go 'Skins! 01:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet at Christopher Tsai
Ok, I'm blocking the IP and indef block on Ctsai1, as well as rolling back his edits. Thanks for letting me know. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 15:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

WikipediaWeekly Episode 45
Hello again! Just a note that WikipediaWeekly Episode 45 has been released. Listen and comment at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/04/14/wikipedia-weekly-45-blps-revisited/. Cheers, <font color="#00C">W<font color="#007">ODU P  20:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you no longer wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from that list.

How do well get the Young Muslim UK article deleted
There are no primary sources references except the groups website, it is not notable. thanks It is me i think (talk) 21:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Phantom Exam Syndrome
Hi,

Just for the record, the article I wrote on "Phantom Exam Syndrome" was not a prank. I understand the concerns of the Wiki-management team, and respect the integrity they are trying to maintain of this resource. I am new at this, and I will do my home work before publishing on wikipedia. I was under the impression that I could begin an article and complete it later. I have learnt otherwise since I have learnt differently since reading the guidelines for writing articles.

Thanks for your time,

Greenkufi (talk) 13:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation
Hi Ukexpat: The article about the notable synagogue, Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation has now been expanded with reliable sources provided. Please take a look. Based on this, could you please withdraw the nomination to delete the article. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 12:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Ukexpat: Thank you for withdrawing the nomination. Yours sincerely, IZAK (talk) 06:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Coastal Studios article
I believe my Coastal Studios article now fits within Wikipedia's guidelines. Please let me know if any changes need to be made to the article.

Thank you

Otaku0013 (talk) 19:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Otaku0013

Judaic Publishing Co.
Reconsider your proposed Quick deletion of the above please. --Ludvikus (talk) 16:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Can you please sign & date your notice on my page? Thanks. --Ludvikus (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

witchcraft
I pu this title in. --Ludvikus (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I created the page on witchcraft and children. All information was taken from published sources with no personal input involved. I noticed that you nominated it for deletion. Can you please advise as to what I need to do to make it acceptable. Thank you. Tmsmom (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Liam Ashley
I added the Category:New Zealand murdered children to "Liam Ashley" which redirects to the "Murder of Liam Ashley" article WhisperToMe (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Why do you think it cannot be salvaged as an article? TigerShark (talk) 22:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 46 and 47
Just a quick note: Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 46 and 47 are out. A good listen as always. :) Cheers, <font color="#00C">W<font color="#007">ODU P  03:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

I am glad you enjoyed the article !
I am glad you enjoyed the article and thanks for the tips !! This was my first article, so I was a little unfamiliar with the editing process. I will make sure to follow your advice in the future - I know my list of edits was way to long. I like what you did with the pics as well, I didnt like them the way I had them but didn't know how to improve it. Thanks again ! Escully21 (talk) 21:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 48
Hey there! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 48, Wikipedia Weekly's third talk with Jimmy Wales, is now available. Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.


 * Have a comment about the episode? You can leave your comment right on the episode's page!
 * Miss an episode? Catch up in the Wikipedia Weekly archives at wikipediaweekly.org!
 * Know someone who would love Wikipedia Weekly? Tell them about it!
 * Care to participate in a podcast? Sign up here!

For the Wikipedia Weekly team, <font color="#00C">W<font color="#006">ODU P <font color="#666">bot  23:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)