User talk:Ukexpat/Archive 14

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Marknutley/The Gore Effect
Hi this is already being dealt with here [] Is there a reason you have put a speedy deletion notice up? --mark nutley (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

KINDERDANCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Thank you for your response. I can edit the parts and take out the trademarks and I can actually mention Essence and Entrepreneur magazine as sources that have written something about us. May I use these sources? I actually did not write it up, we just submitted it. The information is taken out of published article. Please advise. Thank you.

Kind regards, Darlene —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuncscio (talk • contribs) 19:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD
Please see: Articles for deletion/Sister Vincenza Taffarel (2nd nomination).Borock (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of GalenLogoExplained.png
Ukexpat,

I have reached out to the Galen Institute, who should be sending information allowing me to use their image on my Wikipedia page. Once they send this information and it is received by Wikipedia, how do things proceed? Andrewpsroyal (talk) 21:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Premier Asia
Regarding your issues with my article, you state that one problem is notability yet the Hong Kong Legends page (which I did not write or contribute to) has no such issue. I state in my article that Hong Kong Legends and Premier Asia are sister companies owned by Entertainment One (with a reference to prove it). How can one company be notable and the other not when they are both owned overall by the same company and both produce the same product (DVDs) from the same area (Asia)?

You also state that the article may contain improper references to self-published sources. Can you tell me where? (Keeping in mind that I did not write or contribute to the Hong Kong Legends article)

Lastly you request additional references. The two I provided detail the company's history from their ownership under Contender Entertainment Group to present under Entertainment One and a list of the company's releases up to and including 2007 (keeping in mind the company stopped releasing films at the beginning of 2008). You say the references must be significant coverage rather than passing mentions, does a list of titles excluding only the one or two releases in the few months from summer 2007 (when the company was sold) to the beginning of 2008 (when the company ceased) not qualify as significant coverage? Tdk4051 (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you Ukexpat. IlonamIlonam (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome
I appreciate the note. Are you interested in the subject (18th-century French literature) or a Wikipedia staff member?--Panpichon (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

technical problem
Can you help me with a technical problem? The page I did on Francoise de Graffigny has been tagged as needing inline references. I spent much of the day trying to post it with inline references, and kept getting the error message that I had to have a "references/" tag. I did have that tag, but it would not work. Do you have any idea what the problem could have been? I tried it in the sandbox; I tried posting the article in small pieces; nothing worked.--Panpichon (talk) 02:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your pre-review of my draft on Maxwell Anderson
Many thanks for your help. I've looked into double brackets and am on my way to read all the other (slightly unusual to me) editorial markup features! Editing for Wikipedia is definitely going to introduce me to a new world, but it's one I guess I have to understand better if I'm to be useful meeting with senior Wikiupedians on these matters of museum involvement that I think have longterm strategic importance to both communities. If I make further changes to the Anderson article or post it, I'll let you know. David Bearman (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)David Bearman, January 9 2010

Thanks for the ongoing watch. I'm sure that will prove very helpful as it has been already.
I'll make the Wikipedia markup my weekend project:-) I exercised the new knowledge once this morning by brackleting AMICO and removing the reference, since AMICO was a Wikipedia article already. As always with new environments, its not the intrinsic complexity of the new data language that is a barrier but the fact that it is a different language from the many I usually use. David Bearman (talk) 16:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)David Bearman Jan 9 2010

AfD nomination of Natasha Wheat
An article that you have been involved in editing, Natasha Wheat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rees11 (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

HOW? Still haven't the answer?
I have asked questions under the title, HOW? and still don't have the answer...First I was told by you my submission didn't fit a User Page....I then asked how I could put it on a page that would be seen by searchers for my name, using the example of the long pages found under Alex Karras, with a link to other people from Gary, IN. I now get an answer from Colin Fine telling me I apparently used the wrong term in calling it a PROFILE... I have explained that I am not familiar with Wiki jargon...I don't know care what it is called, I just want to place it on Wikipedia so people can learn from it...certainly Karras's pages reads more like a PROFILE than mine does....Mine describes a book with all kinds of historic events centered around Gary and NW Indiana, names of important celebrities including four US presidents, and concludes with information about solving one of America's most baffling cold-cases, the murder of three young Chicago girls in the Indiana Dunes....What more historic posting can you look for in an encyclopedia? PLEASE TELL ME EXACTLY HOW TO LIST MY CONTRIBUTION THE SAME AS THAT OF ALEX KARRAS, WITH TO INCLUSION OF MY NAME IN THE ALPHABETICAL LISTING WHICH COMES UP WHEN YOU CLICK THE LINK, OTHER PEOPLE FROM GARY, IN...SO WHEN PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO WAS LOOKING AT KARRAS'S PAGES, THEN CLICKED ON THE LINK FOUND OTHERS FROM GARY THAT I KNEW AND READ THEIR PAGES....I WANT WHEN PEOPLE SEARCH GOOGLE FOR MY NAME, LIKE I DID FOR KARRAS, A LINK COMES UP SENDING THEM TO WIKIPEDIA AND MY PAGE, OR IF LOOKING AT ANOTHER GARY RESIDENT AND AT THE END CLICKS THE LINK TO OTHERS FROM GARY, THEY WILL SEE MY NAME AND CLICK IT ON AND FIND MY CONTRIBUTION....WHATEVER YOU CALL IT...IF IT ISN'T A PROFILE...PLEASE ADVISE HOW TO GET IT ON WIKIPEDIA WITHOUT ALL THE JARGON OF NAMES THAT ONLY WIKIPEDIA USERS KNOW....JUST PLAIN LANGUAGE ON HOW TO GET THIS INCLUDED LIKE THE ALEX KARRAS PAGE...

01:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Dick Wylie (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

adjusting...
hi Ukexpat thanks for your thoughts. i've made a few changes to the article to eliminate those copied sections. it's my first ever contribution, so it's good to have people telling you these things (yes i read the guidelines, but still, some copied bits and pieces slipped through). what's the next step? cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwikiputt (talk • contribs) 12:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Nobel Biocare
--Kennedie101 (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Hi again I was wondering how I would go about deleting and re-writing the description and history sections of Nobel Biocare. We want to update/rewrite. Thank youKennedie101 (talk) Kennedie 101

Welcome thanks
Thanks, Ukexpat. I hope I am doing this correctly. I currently have my first article waiting for review. Hopefully someone will look at it and give me tips if it needs fixing.

Thanks again.

Tgtotu (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation for Hannah Tompkins
I won't clog up the WP:New contributors' help page with a small point, but hatnotes should not be used on pages that do not require disambiguation – see WP:NAMB (part of WP:Hatnote). If you think about it, there's no way a user could search for 'Hannah Tompkins' (as in the wife of Vice President Daniel Tompkins) and arrive at Hannah Tompkins (artist). So although the hatnote at Hannah Tompkins is perfectly proper, the hatnote at Hannah Tompkins (artist) should be removed. It's not a big deal, but we might as well get it right! --RexxS (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

use of images?
I was under the impression that the images in Commons are freely available, which is why I was using them in my user space. Were the images I used not from Commons or am I mistaken about what Commons is? Thank you. --Neptunerover (talk) 02:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay, now here is one that definitely says non-free boldly in various places on it's page. I don't remember noticing that on the others. Although actually, I might have just copied some of those photo links directly from an article page since I was just under the impression that everything on Wikipedia is free and all the pictures come out of commons. I was naive. So can I ask you (or is there a better place for me to ask) why an advertisement for a movie such as the one I just linked to above is not considered free? They put those all over the place when the movie came out, in magazines, newspapers, and on the posters in the theaters. They put the stuff all over the place for us to look at, but we can't use it? It's not like I would draw a moustache on his face or put him in a dress, which would be defacing an original advertisement, but why can't I put the add out there too? I should think they would like that! They had to pay for that advertisement the first time around, but now they don't want anyone to look at it unless they get paid? That can't be right. --Neptunerover (talk) 08:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combustion_chemical_vapor_deposition
Hello,

I have the following message on top of the page "This article is written like an advertisement". Can you please read the article again and tell me what changes needs to be done. I edited it in a neutral point of view.

Thanks, Aartich (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Jason Smart
Thanks, UKExpat! I appreciate your criticisms, ideas and help in helping me to write this article about Jason Smart. I think that it is a good article, but it could use your expert analysis! Smart is an interesting character and I think that a lot of people probably would be interested in him... Especially for those of us that keep-up on US-Russian relations. Thanks!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuriipetrovich (talk • contribs) 01:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Brenda Jean Patrick
Dear Ukexpat,

Thank you for taking time to review my proposed article about Ms. Patrick.

She has spoken at the school where I am on the foundation board of directors, and we were much impressed with what she did for our school.

Please help me understand how to gain greater neutrality:

Do I need to find negative comments about Ms. Patrick or about the concept of greater customer service in schools?

Are some of the details about her life more than is needed for a Wikipedia article (e.g., her comments from her father)? These comments were made to the graduates at our school for "challenged" students and seemed to strike a chord with them.

Are there other aspects of "neutral" I haven't mentioned?

Thanks again.

Captaincorgi (talk) 03:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Brenda Jean Patrick
Dear Ukexpat,

If you saw the other comments regarding this proposed article, you may have seen the one regarding using more sources (News, books, etc.)

I have followed the suggested links, and I discovered that many of them lead to newspapers in Texas (Dallas Morning News and other smaller papers). The links are there, but in order to view the full content, a reader is charged $2.95 for seeing the full article.

In the world of Wikipedia, is there a way of solving that problem? Would I create the link and let a reader choose whether or not to spend the money?

Right now, this seems like a pretty "sticky wicket" to get around.

Thanks.

Captaincorgi (talk) 04:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

"Vandalising", "Ok for the last time" - who the fuck do you think are? Mr Encyclopaedia?

You don't own Wikipedia loser, you English "twat" (hey, why don't you contribute to the meaning of that one by describing yourself ??)

Get a life —Preceding unsigned comment added by Illzd (talk • contribs)

Kit Barker is the page title, thanks, --Riversdaletom (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again for your clean up of the posted article on Max Anderson
You've given me a lot of help, and the courage to go on and write a few more articles about things I think aren't currently covered in wikipedia. I greatly appreciate it. When I've gained some experience, I'll try to be as helpful to others:-) David Bearman (talk) 23:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)David Bearman

Getting feedback
Hi Ukexpat Thanks for the welcome. I created a new article and (I think) put out a request for someone more experienced than me to review it and check that it is 'up to scratch'. Do you know how I can check progress on that? --Wickie Bruce (talk) 09:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC) Wickie Bruce

Need help having my article reviewed
Hello,

I need some help having my article reviewed, I followed all necessary steps to add it to the "article review request" page, which it now sits, but no one has yet to review it.

The article is on a producer/director who has done much work for National Geographic.

Can you lend me any advise on how to make this article not say: "This page is a new unreviewed article." at the top?

Any advice would be appreciated!

All the best,

Edgewest (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Michio Kaku
Please stop revering the correct information. He is American just for the fact of being born in the USA, but ethnically he is Japanese because both of his parents were 100% Japanese. If one of them was, for instance, Chinese, you could say that he is Chinese-Japanese. And considering that North America is made up of people from all over the world, it has hard to have american ethnicity, unless you are one of the ethnic peoples. Norum 20:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion?
I understand that this page is nominated for speedy deletion. However, ImaGem as a company is the ONLY diamond grading lab that can objectively grade diamonds and give numerical measurements for diamond Light Behavior. The chairman and founder of the company created the technology in 1989 and is the first and only to use machines to grade diamonds! This is why I feel this is notable, and the technology has a lot of other uses, such as the clarity mapping machine that can enter the medical industry to assist cancer research. Please give me more time to reorganize, if the whole thing needs to be RE-DONE I am ok with that, but I WILL keep trying until I get it right. Even if that means you delete my page and I have to start over. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grader222 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Help desk
Why did you restore my help desk edit? Its just going to cause a flame war!Accdude92 (talk to me!) 20:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

new article for review
I wrote a couple articles on topics I thought were not covered. One, on electronic records, I just moved to live. The other on museum informatics is still at my user page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Bearman/museum_informatics) because I'm not as sure about it. I'd appreciate your reviewing either or both. Thanks David Bearman (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)David Bearman Jan 16 2010David Bearman (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ukexpat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Iyare Igiehon -

Felix Rodrguez Alvarado
I am totally facinated by this initial wiki posting experience. That may not come across in my response to your feedback on my first article. I just kicked that page off to the historian that should have probably written it. That aside, will there be others that provide feedback or you the difinitive expert? If so, I am sincere in my gratitude, because I need your help and because I respect the time you have taken to provide the feedback. I've started a talk page for this article and hope for more techinical advice. The writing style can't be helped. Keenonit (talk) 03:45, 18 January 2010 (UTC) keenonit (mla) 1/17/2007

Why you want to delete my article that is just cruel. D:<

that is uncivil and cruel

~Tsukiyomi_Moon

Speedy Deletion
The C.Y.A.O. is a company and may not be widely known but I work for them so I don't see anything wrong. Tsukiyomi Moon (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Giulio graglia
You nominaged Giulio graglia for deletion under WP:CSD. This category only covers articles that actually exist in another language's Wiki. If the article doesn't exist on another wiki, then it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. I was coming here to say the same thing - A2 is only for use where the identical article exists on another Wikipedia, and this one is not in :it. (The point of A2, which took me some time to find out, is that a cut and paste from another WP violates the license terms by losing the attribution from all the contributors there - WP:TRANSLATE explains how to bring an article across properly). The thing to do with an article in another language is put notenglish at the top, or etc if you can identify the language, and follow the links on that template to list it at WP:PNT. Of course it may be obvious, as in this case, that the article is speediable db-person; in that case just tag it as such. If you specify the language in the  template, it provides a helpful link to Google Translate, whose results are surprisingly good and often enable you to confirm that the article is speediable, in which case add the db tag at the top and don't bother with WP:PNT. There is a useful set of templates at WP:PNT/T which you can use to point the foreign author to his own-language WP - I think many people are unaware that there are any others. Apologies if all this is telling you stuff you already knew. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, OK, I got it, mea culpa! – ukexpat (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn't mean to pile on, keep up the good work! JohnCD (talk) 18:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Serban Tanasa
Hello Ukexpat. I noticed you placed a number of tags on the Self-expression article. Can you be any more specific as to what you think I should do, to meet the Wiki standards?

Many thanks! Serban Tanasa (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

out on film
Hello and thank you for your comments. As a first time poster, I have been editing the article and hope it is more in line with the requirements. Jim ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgfl1 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: The Good King
Hello Ukexpat. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Good King, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit conflict?
- right? If so, no worries. -- Neil N   talk to me  21:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Cheers! -- Neil N   talk to me  21:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Purpose, Credibility and Opinion
The recent editor (racepacket) states in the "Discussion Section" that if a (black) student wants to become a leader, that he or she should attend an Ivy League school.

The recent editor further discusses alumni of Ivy League schools (Dartmouth, Harvard, Cornell....etc), Ivy League alumni such as Clarence Thomas and other matters related to the actual Ivy League.

None of that discussion is relevant to the group of seven or nine HBCUs who are members of the Black Ivy League, to the history of these school became what is referred to as the Black Ivy League or the term's meaning.

The title of the article is: The Black Ivy League (a term which refers to the nation's premier HBCUs). The article is however, not titled: "Blacks who attended Ivy League schools" or "The Ivy League is making efforts to increase their Minority Enrollment" Or "Obama and Clarence Thomas went to Yale and Harvard."

Instead, the article serves to give historic reference to the "phrase" The Black Ivy League, its meaning and in some manner, identify those institutions which make up the Black Ivies (i.e., Howard, Morehouse, Spelman, ....).

Hence, statements regarding (the efforts made by Cornell to enroll African-American students), are irrelevant for purposes of the subject article.

More pertinent than the recent edits by racepacket, and more relevant to the overall purpose of the subject article is discovering just how theses HBCUs came to be known as the "Black Ivies" or "the Black Harvards." Explaining how they fair in the various collegiate rankings and identifying who "their" prominent alumni are provide more insight into the why this article exists. MuJami (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)MuJami


 * With all due respect, the above is not a fair characterization of my position and concerns. I have addressed this in detail on User talk:MuJami, on Talk:Black Ivy League and on SPI. During a recent AfD on Black Ivy League, 25 sources were identified, and in November, I did my best to summarize those sources.  I received praise for my efforts.  Later John E. Rhea came on the scene and made unsourced additions with WP:BOOSTERISM problems. He alleged racism, and was rebuffed at his ANI.  He is now silent and newly registered User:MuJami is taking up his argument.  If you want to help mediate a content dispute, that is fine, but I have not seen either Rhea or MuJami address my concerns. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 22:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * OK enough, please take this dispute elsewhere, preferably the talk page of the relevant article. – ukexpat (talk) 22:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Need help with references
Hi UK Expat,

The guidelines say that I need an editor's input to make a reference to a group that I work for (SWITCH) if I want to include a reference to an information resource (wiki) that we have developed to support the law cited in this article. I have cited the only other wiki I know of, and plan to add others here (and to our own wiki) as I find them. Can you guide me on this one?

Thanks

--Mark Alan Gibson (talk) 22:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Photo permission for wiki entry Digital Leather
I have emailed permission from the author and artist for the picture shown on the Digital Leather wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Leather

Please let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks, --Azlord (talk) 22:47, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

first article blues
Hi Ukexpat

Thanks for the comment about my article. I am not sure I published the article correctly and need some guidance.

I know that my article is up but I don't know if that makes it part of Wikipedia and when it will show up in the Wikipedia search tool and Google.

I created it in my userspace and pressed the move button because I thought that was how to post it. But when that did not work I opened up the article wizard and copied and pasted it.

I might also have pressed the upload file button.

Sometime after that my article appeared with a URL that looked like it was up on Wikipedia but I am not sure which one of my actions triggered it appearing.

I am not sure what the next steps are. Is someone going to formally OK the article and will I be contacted?

Thanks for the information,

J.A. MacPhee (talk) 22:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi J.A. MacPhee
 * Pardon my butting in. The article is fully in Wikipedia now. Moving the article out of your user space put it into "article space". It is up, and will be indexed etc.
 * I recommend that you work on improving the references for the article. While the claims to notability are clear (winning multiple awards), it is not obvious that the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion. The sources that you have provided are not independent of the subject. You should seek to find coverage of (not only reference to ) the subject in reliable sources that are independent. News stories specifically about the subject would be ideal.
 * I suspect the subject does meet the inclusion guidelines, but you should nail it down.
 * Regards, Bongo  matic  01:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem and excellent advice. I would just add one thing - don't get hung up about Google search results - we have no control over how quickly their bots index Wikipedia pages, and in any event, we are here to build an encyclopedia, not engage in a Google popularity contest! – ukexpat (talk) 01:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

New article question
Hi Is anyone able to help me with my query? I'd like to out a page on wikipedia for a festival I'm involved with (North East Festival of Learning - a 3 month celebration of informal learning taking place in libraries in North East England). Is this acceptable or is it advertising? Thanks, Jane Byrne (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Marcus Cornish DYK nom
Yayyyyyy! Thanks for letting me know. :) -- DMS (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC) Woohoo! It's just gone into queue 3 after that queue was put up on the front page at 06:00 UTC this morning (almost 2 hours ago), so it should go up on the front page at 18:00 UTC tomorrow (Thurs). And I see they reverted to the original hook. :) -- DMS (talk) 07:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

WP:FEED
Glad to be able to help out. DES (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, no problem. - Reconsider !  07:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Aww... Thanks
PS: got to start looking through all those interesting help links now, I have a lot to learn :) SpitfireTally-ho! 21:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Ian Youngs/Enormous (band)
Hi Ukexpat. Thank you for taking the time to review my first article: User:Ian Youngs/Enormous (band).

Could I take you up on your kind offer to help me move the article, to go live, in the main directory.

One of the song titles, on line 104, "Sharon, you're a shit", might cause Filter 9 to flag it up as an insult to someone.

Regards, --Ian Youngs (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Bob
Why are you being so mean to me ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottrothstein (talk • contribs) 01:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Enormous (band)
Much appreciated. Thank you for your assistance. --Ian Youngs (talk) 01:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

IXO page
HI Ukexpat, Happy New Year and my best wishes to you!

You once wrote: Thanks for the message, glad I could help. I was thinking that maybe we should nominate the article for a spot in the "Did you know" section of the main page. Your thoughts?

I just wonder if the IXO page has ever been nominated? Thank you! Olga OV 19:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olga Vovk (talk • contribs)

Talkback
 Ker αun oςc op ia◁ talk  21:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Veena Rawat article
Hello I have reverted the text that I changed today that resulted in the tone and style note for the Veena Rawat article. Will the note be removed because I have removed the text that was added earlier today? As soon as time allows, I will add more independent references as you suggested.

Thanks,

J.A. MacPhee (talk) 21:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Can you please let me know as soon as you get the draft back? Thanks. Hr4321 (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Reinclusion for 'Women of the Apocalypse'
Hello there,

You nominated Women of the Apocalypse for deletion (and it was deleted) because it wasn't 'notable'.

It has since garnered another exterior review with Vue Weekly (an online and print publication in Edmonton). The link is here: http://www.vueweekly.com/article.php?id=14134

Would that be enough for me to add Women of the Apocalypse again?

--Luthar28 (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I would now have two reviews (three if you consider Robert J Sawyer's review) by independent sources (the London Free Press and Vue Weekly). --Luthar28 (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit war comment
Please explain what you mean by a long established policy on the edit war item I mentioned on the talk page for the article. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 02:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Steve Brudniak
Ukexpat--

Thank you for your help.

I've looked at other entries for artists, including those of similar standing to Steve Brudnaiak, such as Houston's The Art Guys, and I'm now wondering if it might be enough to list the publications under the heading "Selected Bibliography." The publications tend to repeat similar points about Brudniak's work, so attributing specific reference footnotes might be overkill.

My hunch is that my first attempt at posting was deemed "promotional" because I relied on many quotes from art reviewers and curators. Trying to hard to establish Brudniak's place in the art world? Hopefully the entry is neutral now.

If the current version looks Wikipedia worthy I'm wondering what is the next step. Best to post it to a review area for further editing? Must confess that I'm feeling a bit lost and klutzy when it comes to navigating around Wikipedia's inner workings.

Thanks again,

Tim Carroll Mitlorak (talk) 04:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC) www.timcarroll.com

Somewhat Confused
Does this mean that the article is now "live"? I want to write an article on the "Similarity-Based Modeling" algorithm, but want to make sure that I've actually posted my first article before tackling a second one.

Thank you in advance for your help!

Jwkerastas Jwkerastas (talk) 16:08, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Marcus Cornish

 * Looks good! Thank you for nominating the article, and well done finding that photo of the 'Jesus in jeans' statue! -- DMS (talk) 21:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The article got 5.7k views while it was on the main page. Not bad at all! -- DMS (talk) 03:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Many thanks Ukexpat. I've really appreciate your help with the Marcus Cornish article. For the moment, I'm back to wading through lists of typos :) and doing minor tidy ups of articles I come across while I'm doing that. I'm concerned, though, about some of the articles I'm seeing about villages and towns in Pakistan (poor English, and lots of stuff about people of note only within those locations - "my uncle's family have been bakers there for many generations and everyone loves their cakes" - that kind of thing), but I know so little about that topic I wouldn't know where to start, to try and clean those articles up. I've flagged one up on the WikiProject Pakistan discussion page, but that project doesn't look very active at the moment. If you have any recommendations for how best to flag up the need for work to be done on those articles, I'd be grateful. -- DMS (talk) 16:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for response...1 more question
Hello, thank you for the feedback on my first article on Tobias Sherman. My object here is to be the FIRST to be the first to "publish" the fact that these 4 Miami Socialites are the next big Celebrity to hit. I know for a fact huge celebrity is starting to surround these key 4 young people. I can validate the fact that they are the who's who of Miami Beach right now and are in talks to collaborate on different projects with different celebrity. Am I just too early out of the gate on this since I can't back up in print why these guys are Miami society?

I would think for example just the fact that Mr. Sherman was able to purchase scores miami with all of the press behind scores NY would make him notable. As far as Mr. Sherman and the others go each has a specialty that makes them attractive to athletes, actors, and musicians. I just want credit for being the first to break the story on them, and hopefully gain future interviews.

--William Pennrod (talk) 18:39, 21 January 2010 (UTC) William Pennrod

RfA?
I saw the discussion on JClemens's page ... if and when you want to run, give me a holler. You're an excellent tagger and very dedicated, but if memory is not playing tricks on me, you'll have a few problems at RfA. (watching) - Dank (push to talk) 21:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message. Just wondered why you think I would have problems - I have a clean record. Is it because I not a prolific article creator, but more of a behind the scenes (layout, formatting etc) wonk? – ukexpat (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are quite a few voters who look closely at article creation, DYKs and GAs. - Dank (push to talk) 22:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, good to know, thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Can you review my article HR 4321 so that it can be posted already? Thanks --Hr4321 (talk) 07:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi
I noticed that you tagged the page that I am trying to create. We are launching world's first help engine in Feb 2010, and wanted to create an entry in Wikipedia. It is not for advertisement purposes, rather for informational purposes.

Please feel free to respond to me at vijaykg@ibloomtech.com for any clarifications or further questions.

Warm regards, Vijay KG —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibloomtech (talk • contribs) 18:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

DoggyRide article rewritten
Hello,

The DoggyRide has been rewritten. Please review.

mattmontare —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattmontare (talk • contribs) 05:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Peter Stevens (aka Georg Franz Hein)
Hi,

How can I get my subject added to the group "Recipients of the Military Cross"?

Thanks,

Marc Carrera57 (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Please Help to fix the References section of this Page
The last four references on the page on "Samar Chatterjee" seems to have been saved improperly. Please fix it; and suggest ways to edit the References in future. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushila69 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Please fix the problem in the References section of the wiki page on "Samar Chatterjee". Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushila69 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Inquiring if paper on "The Study of Knowledge Sharing" by Chen Xiaohui has been accepted
Can you tell me if the paper on "The Study of Knowledge Sharing" has been accepted or not? I had a lot of difficulty trying to find where to submit the article once all the required information was filled in. Chen Xiaohui1967 (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC).

The Study of Knowledge Sharing inquiry
Hello Ukexpat, Could you tell me if the paper submitted by Chen Xiaohui has been accepted as a submittable? I am acting as a good will ambassador for her attempting to do the paperwork for her to have her paper published. She is working on her doctor degree in China I am trying to help her get published in America. I can not find the site to check and see if the paper has been accepted for review. I would really appreciate your help. Thank you, David L. Cook Chen Xiaohui1967 (talk) 02:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC).

SmartSignal Article
Dear Ukexpat,

I was the Director of Marketing Communications for SmartSignal, but left the company in March of 2007. I believe that the SmartSIgnal technology is an important industrial technology which is why I have written about it (I'm also trying to expand my writing resume). I would like to make the appropriate revisions to the article to get it posted - this is my first attempt at contributing to Wikipedia. Can you please give me a few pointers on what changes I should make?

Best regards,

Jwkerastas —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwkerastas (talk • contribs) 21:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of European Federation of Materials Handling - FEM
An article that you have been involved in editing, European Federation of Materials Handling - FEM, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Although you didn't actually contribute to this article, you did comment on the two help desk questions about it, so I thought you might be interested in looking at the AfD. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

reply
Ok thank you what I needed was to see an edited version of my article so that it would encourage me to bring more articles to this site, thank you again, you can as well send the comments to my email: mhegeraelias@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.41.59.190 (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Evil Scotsman
Not a Billy Connolly fan then?

Yeah I do know better, unfortunately I'm also getting irritated of constantly being accused of ad hominem attacks for expressing an opinion. Justin talk 15:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * OK I take your point. Justin talk 16:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

For the record, I will not accept abuse from Justin Kuntz, and when he makes an ad hominem remark I will take the action that I deem appropriate. Michael Glass (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * This is not the place to debate your differences. My involvement is an end - Justin has acknowledged that his comment was inappropriate. – ukexpat (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Moving page to mainspace
Hi UK Expat, I've had some feedback on my article - main question was whether Dr Smith is sufficiently notable, but he meets the criteria listed OK, so I'm quite confident about that. I think best next move is to move the page to mainspace and let others edit if they want. However, I don't know how to move the page! I clicked on 'move' but I don't know what to put in as the new name. I'm sure it's very easy, but ... help? PS I tried clicking on 'live chat' but got no answer :-( Thanks for your help. --Wickie Bruce (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC) Wickie Bruce

Barbie article
Hi, I did what you suggested. i wrote an unbiased article, included my sourcing, all prestigious and reliable,....and they said it was off subject....can you take a look at the DISCUSSION page and tell me what i did wrong? It is very pertinent information about the doll and her history,...BillyBoy* outlined the decades to come in regard to Barbie by doing it all from 1984-1988. i would appreciate your help,

Thanks

Alec JiriAlec jiri (talk) 21:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: welcome.
Thankyou for your message of welcome.

Unfortunately as the reaction to my first article has been considerably less than welcoming I don't see myself spending too much more time writing for Wikipedia. EricPolymath (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note, I've undone the redirect, Dry rot treatment is an article again. Discussion is here. expat, maybe you could run an eye over the article and compare quality to the section on treatment in dry rot? Franamax (talk) 22:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Peter Stevens (aka Georg Franz Hein)
Wow! Thanks very much for all of your efforts in making this a very informative article. Much appreciated!

All the best,

Marc Carrera57 (talk) 12:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Evil Scotsman & Pro-Imperialist
Note that I'm not requesting admin intervention but I thought you may find it as amusing as I did. As well as being an Evil Scotsman I am apparently Pro-Imperialist. I guess I'm just easily amused but the Darth Vader march from Star Wars just spontaneously popped into my head. Justin talk 13:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

the Beatnicks movie
TY - Ukexpat for your feedback. While the film is about to receive national distribution, it has not had reviews, articles published,etc. I will work on that and update, when the film fits the criteria as noted in Notability guidelines. MediaVulture (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)mediavulture

I once created an alternate account
Good day to you! Since you welcomed me on this wiki, I'm taking the liberty to ask for your advice. - Last March I created a different account (KerenOr9) for my computer needed fixing while I was sick and could not handle that , - and I was competing in the fr.wiki so I could not wait for too long, - and to help me I was given a second hand computer with only English and Hebrew which did not allow me to enter my password for Hope (I did not manage to find out how to enter a special sign which is used in French) and I did not know yet that I would be given the opportunity to register a new password -the depth of my ignorance is amazing, it was so simple!-, - and I did not want to contribute anonymously, - and I don't want sb else to use the Keren account, so I want to keep it (even if I don't actually use it anymore), - and indeed I didn't know that using different accounts is ill considered on this wiki -I found that out this week-, - is the above explanation a bit too obscure? sorry for that, if it's not really clear... I can elaborate if you ask for more lengthy details, my question is: what do I do now to be on the safe side? many thanks in advance,  Hope&amp;Act3! (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why my name does not appear on your talk page as it does here... so one more time  Hope&amp;Act3! (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for this rapid answer! it's reassuring. I signalled that I have an alternate account both at Keren and at Hope, please can you tell me how to redirect the pages to my main account Hope? again TY,  Hope&amp;Act3! (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * oh no, I thought that wd merely redirect new changes to the pages, may be I can just keep things as is? feels good to have s.o. responsible to talk to! Hope&amp;Act3! (talk) 19:33, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Fine! that suits me, you've been of great help, thanks, take care, Hope&amp;Act3! (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

dyk
sounds great, thank you! SB —Preceding unsigned comment added by SysBio (talk • contribs) 02:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK hook too long at Peter Stevens (pilot)
Hello! Your submission of Peter Stevens (pilot) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Binksternet (talk) 08:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion - you could drop 'at the start of the war' without losing too much of the interest factor. Good story though, well told. Now that's a real 'hero' !!

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Murder of Brenda Dawn Hirons
Dear Ukexpat I am trying to express my concerns with the article Murder_of_Brenda_Dawn_Hirons. I have struggled to edit part of the article myself (with my very limited understanding of how to work Wikipedia) and the piece has been reverted back within hours/minutes. This could be because of my errors so please can you help. I have these issues with the piece. 'Victim' section. 1. The victims son is named and his year of birth given. This results in this Wikipedia article, his mothers murder, appearing on the first search page if you Google his name. This could cause distress and possibly influence employers, so out of respect and privacy I wish to have these removed .ie. 'Grant, born in 1970'. 2. The victims full maiden name and place of birth appears, this could also create a direct link back to 'still living ' relatives of the victims family, so I wish this information to be removed .ie. 'Born Brenda Dawn James[1] on the 31st January 1938, in the small village of Brotheridge Green of Upton on Severn'. 3. The article appears to include far more personal details than in other Wikipedia murder articles I have read, giving it a sensationalist tone. This amount of detail is upsetting for both 'still living' family members of the victim and also for the 'still living' family of the mistress. These innocent family members have already lived in the shadow of this crime and the distress it caused at the time of the murder and trial. I am trying to bring about these changes in good faith but appologise if I do not understand the official way/or how to ask for delition of atleast the most sensitive information. Thank you for reading my concerns, I hope you are able to help. Malvernwoman (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Dr.Kaku
The programme was on BBC4 'COSMIC TIME' when Dr. Kaku himself mentioned the fact that his parents were Buddhists and he was also brought up with Christianity; he used this in his discussion on if the Universe is timeless or not. Cheers, Peter —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Dorey (talk • contribs) 21:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry to butt in on the talk page like this, but I reverted Dorey's edits twice. If nothing else, adding this info into the article is WP:TRIVIA and is unacceptable. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Dr Kaku edits by Peter Dorey
Could you please do me a favour and tell editor HelloAnnyong (can't get through to, presumably, her by messaging), who has yet again reversed my contribution that I did source this contribution as BBC 4 TV Programme On Cosmic Time screened 28th January 2010. Dr Kaku specifically talked in the programme with regard to his parents being Buddhist, showing scenes of Japanese Buddhist Temple in the programme and he was also brought up in Chrsitian background in the debate about whetehr the universe is eternal or finite...IT IS VERY RELEVANT to both Physics & Buddhism and the way he put it over. Many Thanks Peter Dorey —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Dorey (talk • contribs) 23:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

New Article
Hello, I remember you helped me with my last article, and I was wondering if you might help again. I wrote an article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_B._Wilkins, that I was hoping you might take a look at. I am also, once again, having trouble posting it. Thanks a bunch! And thanks for your help last time around. Pensrulerstape (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I certainly would like to be told if anything in the article added by myself which constitutes a conflict of interest. Divorce fairs happen around the world and are a fairly recent phenomenon, and since no one else has added relevant information to Wikipedia, I felt that it was right that I should - as someone who has good knowledge of the area - post information, history etc on this site.

I am avoiding promoting any specific events or websites directly, other than providing links to specific pages that provide useful information. My own 'fair' was featured on Thought For The Day on the Wogan Show last year, which indicates how the events are a genuine resource and not mere 'exhibitions' - and of genuine value to people going through life changes.

If there is anything in the article that should be deleted or amended I would welcome that feedback, and if the article is accessible by others world wide it should develop into a record of a significant trend that is occurring world wide, with more information than that provided by myself. I just wanted to get it started!

Suzymiller (talk) 17:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

deletion?
The article I contributed is NOT an autobiography. And following the rules of wikipedia, would qualify due to notability of the person for publication even if it was. I hope this issue can get sorted out soon wothout removal f the page. Notability can easily be proven by the number of citations of G Wagner's work within the existing articles in Wikipedia. regards, BS —Preceding unsigned comment added by SysBio (talk • contribs) 18:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

flagged article
yes, I know that I wrote to you instead, sorry if that was wrong. No, I am not the subject, or in any conflict of interest. Thanks. BS —Preceding unsigned comment added by SysBio (talk • contribs) 19:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the welcome.Alms19067 (talk) 20:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Veena Rawat article
Hi UKExpat

I hope you are well. I need your advice. I definitely do not understand this message. RV - I think it has had too many editors for a speedy, may need to go to Afd. (TW)) (undo)

I had a problem earlier todayn that I am still trying to solve. This message above might be referring to the photo of Veena Rawat that I had been asking for help with deleting in the past few days. The photo has disappeared from Wikimedia Commons, which is good.

However I was trying to find a way to avoid this problem. When I do a Google search and put in Veena Rawat Wikipedia, I get an unexpected result. It is

User:J.A. MacPhee/Veena Rawat (engineer) - Wikipedia, the free ... Dr. Veena Rawat is an engineer and the President of the Communications ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:J.A._MacPhee/Veena_Rawat_(engineer) File:Veena3.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia English: Photo of Veena Rawat. Date. 2009(2009). Source. Own work ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Veena3.jpg More results from en.wikipedia.org »

How can I avoid the file name "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:J.A._MacPhee/Veena_Rawat_(engineer) File:Veena3.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" from coming up? I only want the file name "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veena_Rawat" to come up. That is the file name that comes up when you type Veena Rawat in the Wikipedia search box.

Earlier today I tried to delete the contents of the file en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:J.A._MacPhee/Veena_Rawat_(engineer) File:Veena3.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia but when I navigated to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veena_Rawat, the article has disappeared so I put it back in.

Any advice would be appreciated on how I can avoid the file name en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:J.A._MacPhee/Veena_Rawat_(engineer) File:Veena3.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia from appearing in Google.

Thanks,

J.A. MacPhee (talk) 21:48, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Just curious
Do you live in Mexico, too? Thelmadatter (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

SPI could use your input
Hello Ukexpat. Unfortunately, I've had to start an SPI (seen here) about user talk: Fbeals as another account making nearly identical (disruptive) edits has sprung up. You made helpful comments on the BLP noticeboard, so if you'd like to add anything to the SPI, please do so, I'd appreciate your input. I realize that SPIs are not the quickest way to deal with disruptive users, but I think it's the proper avenue. Thank you! Jhfortier (talk) 04:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Cricket and Law?
Hello UKexpat,

I am struggling to upload the article which I have produced on the Liberal Democrat PPC for my local constituency. I was wondering whether you might be able to help me get this page live. The functions for editing and contributing on Wikipedia are bewildering for a tardy Law student, such as myself. I would be extremely grateful.

Many thanks

NickDentNickDent (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: Greetings
Hi Ukexpat:

thanks for the welcome note.

Should I talk to you about my problem with the "Dissipative Particle Dynamics" page? Let me know if so, and I can give more details.

Take care,

Jsftnano (talk) 16:51, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Pat Welsh move
Yes, thank you! You might also consider "Author" as that is where is is best known. Which ever you feel is more correct. Thank you for the help. I hope this was the correct way to get the title correct - I could not figure out another was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dukeofarc (talk • contribs) 20:53, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

- Peter Hamo holds a major position in one of the world's largest privately owned companies. Additional information will be added to this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigpete187 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

thank you
Thanks for your suggestion of the Anchor template, before changing a section name Eagle4000 (talk) 21:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

question
Hi, Ukexpat, I just wanted to inquire about the article on GP Wagner. I find it very rude that the claim that it is an autobiography is just so put on this article and appears on public site. How long will it take to remove it? (The last thing I wanted is to embaras this person! it seems just incredible that someone can just-so add a tag.. ) BS  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SysBio (talk • contribs) 22:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

List of prolific inventors
Thanks, ukexpat, for reviewing and improving the article. You've given me the confidence to write some more articles. AlexBartlett4 (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

moving the article
Yes please, I would really appreciate it if you could help me move the article. I have noticed that PPCs in other constituencies have Wiki profiles. Although I suppose that could be because they are already deemed to be 'notable people'. Thank you for your assistance, kind regards NickDent NickDent (talk) 09:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi UKexpat, Thanks for you help with getting the article moved, I am really grateful. I have amended the article slightly now to reflect the fact that she may be considered as notable for her endeavours in education, Kind Regards NickDentNickDent (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Brilliant, thats great, thank you very much. I will keep an eye on it and add more references if/when necessary. Kind Regards, NickDentNickDent (talk) 18:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Response
Thank you for your response. Don't get it because its not a explanation that I was looking for.--Jessica A Bruno (talk) 19:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Ezra Baya Lawiri
Thanks very much for reviewing the page. You will have noticed that Orangemike had been by and given me the heads up on a few bits that I tried to correct, some yes, others perhaps not quit. I appreciate your help and kind words. I have a bit more to do, including a photo of his statue. All the best to you Richard Avery (talk) 20:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Phantomsteve's RfA
Hey there, how's it going? I've been admin-coaching User:Phantomsteve for a while, and after a bit of discussion, we've decided now would be an appropriate time to run an RfA. Since you offered to nominate him in November, would you still be interested in including yourself as a co-nom? Cheers, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool, sounds good. I'll start off the page and ping you when it's ready! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Requests for adminship/Phantomsteve. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the co-nom! Now we just have to see how it goes --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 09:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)