User talk:Ukliterary

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Andrew Picken, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Andrew Picken was changed by Ukliterary (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-08-22T05:22:51+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Andrew Picken, Andrew Douglas Picken
Can I be of some assistance with the article? First off, don't worry so much about the redirect at Andrew Picken. Redirects are just helpful things should people type in the wrong name. But going back to Andrew Douglas Picken, in one of your edit summaries, you claim that you wrote most of the article, but it is a word for word copy from A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature. Additionally, the aforementioned book refers to him as Andrew Picken, not Andrew Douglas Picken.

Either way, can you help establish why he is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. The short bio does not look for notable to me. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Re your message: I've gone ahead and deleted the article and all of the various redirects since we agree that he was not particularly notable. I'm glad that you have decided to help out on Wikipedia.  If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me again. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)