User talk:Ulfstein

Tania lacy
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tania lacy, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tanialacy.com/main/?page_id=2. As a copyright violation, Tania lacy appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Tania lacy has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Tania lacy. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Tania lacy, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- - Gl e n 10:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I've regrettably had to re-submit this article for speedy deletion as it is still using much of the copied content. Sorry. --Paulus 11:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Tania lacy 01.jpg

 * According to the notice on the image description page, the image was listed for speedy deletion because you indicated that only Wikipedia can use it. If you or your wife is the copyright-holder of the image (i.e. you or she took the photo), you can remove the deletion notice from the talk page and replace it with GFDL-self or cc-by-sa-2.5. Understand, however, that this means anyone can use the image for their own purposes, not just Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy participating in the project. Andrew Levine 02:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tania lacy01.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tania lacy01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 14:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)