User talk:Uliana245

Welcome!
Hi Uliana245! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert
--Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

2022 bombing of Lviv moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2022 bombing of Lviv, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 07:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ukrainian genocide has been nominated for deletion
Category:Ukrainian genocide has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 01:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Demolition of monuments to Alexander Pushkin in Ukraine
Hi thanks for creating Demolition of monuments to Alexander Pushkin in Ukraine which I’m just reviewing. It is a requirement that when we translate or re-use any material from another language wiki, we give proper attribution for copyright reasons. If you use material from another wiki you should say so in your first edit summary when you create a new article. There’s also a template that can go on the article talk page. Can you let me know please if this article translated material from other wikis so I can add the template for you. Many thanks Mccapra (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Dismantling of the monument "reunification of Russia and Ukraine" in Kyiv.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dismantling of the monument "reunification of Russia and Ukraine" in Kyiv.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 17:00, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Uliana245

Thank you for creating 2022 Deliatyn attack.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SSOU 9112:2021


A tag has been placed on SSOU 9112:2021 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://shop.uas.org.ua/ua/kirilichno-latinichna-transliteracija-ta-latinichno-kirilichna-retransliteracija-ukrains-kih-tekstiv-pravila-napisannja.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Slywriter (talk) 00:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Foreign relations of the Commonwealth of Independent States


A tag has been placed on Category:Foreign relations of the Commonwealth of Independent States indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Commonwealth of Independent States–European Union relations


The page Commonwealth of Independent States–European Union relations has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5701975/KS-30-08-402-EN.PDF/f7b3535e-f703-428a-a6c4-b82ca67fe855?version=1.0. Marked as © European Communities, 2008. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 12:51, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hi Uliana245! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Old Russian Law that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. A page move is not a minor edit. TylerBurden (talk) 03:23, 14 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It seems it is marked as minor by standard for some reason, as mine was also marked as minor when I moved it. So you can disregard this as you didn't mark your other edits as minor. TylerBurden (talk) 03:44, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Moscovite-Novgorodian Wars moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Moscovite-Novgorodian Wars, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx Talk ? 21:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi thanks for creating this valuable document! I have tried to supplement it with (English-language) references and have re-submitted it to the process. Hopefully it won't take long. Maybe  can help the process along if s/he's involved in it. Armduino (talk) 06:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello . I have no problem with people contacting me to fast-track the AfC process on articles draftified by me. Looking at this draft, it's much better than what it was before. The section about the first war seems ok, but the rest of the paragraphs still lack sources to verify the claims. The topic seems to be notable, but it just needs a few more sources. Ping me or drop me a message on my talk page after improvements and I'll take a look at it. ~Styyx Talk ? 07:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Deleted warning. --Serols (talk) 11:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That is, not constructive? The name of the garden should correspond to the name of the city. You seem to have confused something, because recently the Ukrainian version of the transliteration of the city became the main one, unlike the Russian version.Uliana245 (talk) 10:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, yesterday the name was it yet Odessa in Wikipedia.en. --Serols (talk) 11:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Moscovite-Novgorodian Wars moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Moscovite-Novgorodian Wars, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:04, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Russian occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol
Hello, Uliana245,

Thank you for creating Russian occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This page presents a very pro-Ukraine viewpoint, and does not take the Russian side of events into account. Other pages on this topic contain statements such as "Russia objects to the label of annexation..." or similar, in order to present the opinions of both sides on a charged issue. Also, the use of "scare quotes" or words such as so-called is non-neutral."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2022 bombing of Lviv
Hello, Uliana245. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 bombing of Lviv, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2022 bombing of Lviv


Hello, Uliana245. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 bombing of Lviv".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of 2022 Deliatyn attack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Deliatyn attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2022 Deliatyn attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)