User talk:Uliana Philippova

June 2017
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Uliana Philippova" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 15:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

IspirerSystems (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Ok, thanks a lot, and ! Should I by myself send the request for consideration?Uliana Philippova (talk) 07:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Uliana Philippova (talk) 09:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, thanks, but the problem is that I don't agree that the draft was not promotional. Perhaps the next admins feels differently. In the meantime, it is a good idea for you to look at some of the articles here to help you determine what "neutral" is. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 17:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I've done the rename (from User:Ispirer Systems), and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Any objections to restoring this draft and giving the user the opportunity to make it neutral?— CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 13:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Done--but that thing is going to need a lot of work. Drmies (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Well this will be the opportunity for the user to demonstrate their intentions.— CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 13:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks a lot, and ! I have moved the Ispirer Systems article to the incubator. Does it make any sense? As I have read that 'Articles should not be added to the Incubator. Consider WP:DRAFTS instead'. Thank you once again! Uliana Philippova (talk) 15:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Hey, and ! I have moved the Ispirer Systems article to the incubator. Does it make any sense? As I have read that 'Articles should not be added to the Incubator. Consider WP:DRAFTS instead'. Thank you! Uliana Philippova (talk) 09:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Uliana, I don't know what that incubator is, but draft space is fine. However, you were arguing that the draft was not promotional. Whether it is or isn't, it's not in accordance with our practices and our guidelines. Consider these edits and their edit summaries. The article should be about the company, but it basically only gives characteristics of a product, and it does that in a very promotional way. Listing what it does and how it works with other things is not what an encyclopedic article (even on that product) ought to do (I hope agrees). That's what company websites and magazine ads are for. At the very least things ought to be referenced with reliable, independent secondary sources. Until that happens, you probably won't see this in mainspace... Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Hey, ! Thanks for your prompt reply. I've edited the Ispirer Systems article in accordance with your requirements and requirements of Wikipedia guidelines. Hope that it's ok now. Could you tell how I can request to move the article into the mainspace. Or can I do it myself with the help of 'Move' Button? Thanks! Uliana Philippova (talk) 10:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC) Uliana Philippova (talk) 10:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That is much better, though I can't guarantee anything before coffee. Yes, you can move it yourself. Good luck, Drmies (talk) 12:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

, one more question for you: Can I somehow remove 'redirect' from my page? As when moving the article out the draft space, I renamed 'Ispirer Systems' into 'Ispirer Systems (company)'. As a result I don't like. Could you help me to resolve this issue? I'm very, very sorry for disturbances. Many thanks! Uliana Philippova (talk) 14:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Uliana, no problem--I'm not sure what the problem was, exactly; there was a redirect left from the original draft, but no one would run into that, ordinarily. Anyway, I deleted it, and I deleted the intermediate redirect as well. Is that what you wanted? Drmies (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

, it's that! Thank you very much! I'm very sorry, but I have another question: Why do my article 'categories' contain the draft article 'Draft:Ispirer Systems' not the article in mainspace? Hope, it's really the last question :) Thank you! Uliana (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't know what you are seeing. If I go to Category:1999 establishments in Belarus your article shows up properly. Perhaps you need to reload and purge those pages? Drmies (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

, I see that the situation is different in different browsers. In Chrome it's OK, in Opera and Mozilla I see in categories 'Draft:Ispirer Systems' (I reloaded these pages several times!). When clicking on the 'Draft:Ispirer Systems', it is said 'Sorry, this page was recently deleted (within the last 24 hours)...'. See the screenshot on Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_rfOFN_OUf9SzFMRmpoRExySkE Uliana (talk) 08:40, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't see your Google image, but there is nothing in the code of the page that says "draft". Yes, the Draft is deleted; I did so yesterday. Try WP:PURGE? Drmies (talk) 12:04, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

, yeah! It worked! Thanks so much for your help! Uliana (talk) 12:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello,! As i can see you have proposed deletion of Ispirer Systems page. The main reason is WP:USERGENERATED. But as you can see the page was created quite a long time ago and we have fixed it several times to correspond to the Wikipedia policy. In "references" part we have some links that,as we think prove our encyclopaedic notability. Could you please tell me,what exactly we should change in order to our page won't be deleted?

Proposed deletion of Ispirer Systems


The article Ispirer Systems has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "An article sourced to press releases and WP:USERGENERATED sites about the company's products. No evidence provided or found to show that the company is of encyclopaedic notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Uliana Philippova. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ispirer Systems, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 16:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ispirer Systems for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ispirer Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ispirer Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 14:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo owned by Ispirer Systems, ispirer.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Logo owned by Ispirer Systems, ispirer.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)