User talk:Ulisse0

Hi there, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and stick around. If you want, you can drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself.

Before you start doing a lot of editing, you might want to take the Tutorial. It gives a lot of basic info you'll want to get you oriented on Wikipedia.

You can sign your name on talk pages by using three tildes ( " ") for your username and four (" ~ ") for your username and a timestamp.

If you have any other questions about the project, then check out Help or add a question to the Help desk.

Happy editing, Louisemil 05:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, but is that a bot welcome or a real one? ;-) --Ulisse0 06:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * [**************Please contact me on it.wiki*****************]

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Gnosis
Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Your edits may well be correct, but can you kindly please add a source? :) That page is a magnet for unsourced content, and sourcing would be greatly appreciated. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 04:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Account activation codes have been emailed.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
 * The 1-year, free period begins once you enter the code.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Inaccuracies in the Da Vinci Code
Hi. You added material to the Inaccuracies in the Da Vinci Code article, which states that the Jesus bloodline theory,, might be revived by a September 2012 presentation, but the source you cited for this is a 1998 book. Can you explain this? Nightscream (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Gospel of Jesus' Wife
Further to the note above, you also added content to Gospel of Jesus' Wife which is not supported by sources. The claims themselves might be supported by unrelated sources but no sources exist linking the two gospels together specifically. This is still considered Original Research under WP:SYNTH - ideas "synthed" together when the connection is not supported by sources. Until a reliable secondary source links the two, including these ideas is not appropriate, as the connection is your own idea or research. I have hidden the content rather than deleting it. If you can find a source, great. If not, it should be removed until it can be verified.

I note you have also included content about the above article in other articles where you think there is a connection. Again, the inclusion of these claims are not supported by sources and should be removed until you can find appropriate sources. Cheers, Stalwart 111  (talk) 02:12, 22 September 2012 (UTC).


 * Hi again mate. Thanks for your further contributions. These are much closer to what I was talking about above - assertions backed up by proper references. Thanks for putting the effort into verifying the content you added. I have cleaned the text up a bit in line with the manuals of style but it didn't need too much editing. Cheers! Stalwart 111  (talk) 22:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Extraterrestrial life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Mistero for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mistero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mistero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Baldy Bill ( sharpen the razor &#124; see my reflection ) 22:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

New reference
I have fixed to instead  in the same way as the other 224 references on the page. -- 79.67.241.252 (talk) 18:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

IP Extender question
Just FYI, I've managed to solve my problem, and the same (or similar) solution may work for you. My extender had an IP on the wrong subnet (192.168.0.123, when all my other devices were on the 192.168.1.* subnet), so I regained access by factory resetting and changing the static IP to 192.168.1.123. Since you can't get on even after a factory reset, you could try modifyin your router DHCP settings so that the subnet it's assigning everything to includes the static IP you assigned for the extender (and if that still doesn't work, the factory default). Assuming the subnet mask is 255.255.255.0, then this just means the first 3 sections of the IP need to be the same. MChesterMC (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Italian profanity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lombard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)