User talk:Ulrich von Lichtenstein

Welcome!
Hello, Ulrich von Lichtenstein, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Baboon Waster, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... disco spinster   talk  01:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of The Baboon Waster


The article The Baboon Waster has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lack of notability. Google search for "Baboon Waster" brings up nine results, all of them related to a forum thread.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  01:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is supposed to be a serious and accurate encyclopaedia. Your other edits are fine (and the HEMA articles on here, certainly need improving), but...

Including a highly unnotable section of a forum and including nonsensical information such as it's supposed geographical location (which is, in actuality, in a server somewhere) and claims that visitors can train there and there being equipment there... And I know that you do this, without any kind of serious intent, whatsoever. On wikipedia we are to assume good faith, yes, but not in the presence of obvious evidence to the contrary. You intentionally created a nonsensical article and your own words reveal this. What you are doing constitutes an act of intentional vandalism and trying to make a mockery of wikipedia. Having a bit of fun is all fine and dandy, but vandalism isn't.--ZarlanTheGreen (talk) 03:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the encouraging and kind messages! The criticism is fully accepted. Mea culpa!
 * The nonsense has been blanked. Ulrich von Lichtenstein (talk) 20:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That is great to hear. I'm glad that you have taken this so well and hope you will continue to edit :) --ZarlanTheGreen (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:An instructor at FightCamp.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:An instructor at FightCamp.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schola Gladiatoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

As you know a thing or two about HEMA...
As you are an editor who is knowledgeable about HEMA... I'd like to mention the wikipedia article Classification of swords. It's... in need of massive improvement, to put it nicely. One of the problems is that it only talks about European swords, whereas non-European swords should also be included, but there's plenty of issues just with the information concerning European swords. If you'd like to take a look at it, and maybe make a few edits ...maybe encourage some others to do the same... That would be nice.--ZarlanTheGreen (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)