User talk:UltimateColonial

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --AW (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Warnings
Please explain why you reverted my change and modified language in the GW article such that it does not agree with the cited sources. And please respond on the article's Talk page. --ElKevbo (talk) 03:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --ElKevbo (talk) 01:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC) The section on tuition is both inaccurrate and harmful to the university. GW is not the most expensive university and in fact, the expense of a GW education is offset by ample financial aid. And why is tuition even in the wiki section on GW? It is not in the articles for other colleges. The whole section on tuition should be removed.

Tuition
We have to keep the part about tuition in the article, even though it's not positive for the University. It's the truth, all we can do is report it. --AW (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

'I don't understand why you have sole veto power over content - there are other people who care for GW and know more about it than you. '


 * I don't, but you don't have sole power to say it should be removed. This is how Wikipedia works --AW (talk) 18:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)