User talk:Ultimate Writer

June 2023
Hello, Ultimate Writer. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Scientific articles should prefer secondary sources to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

The editing community highly values expert contributors, so I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add request edit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

wjematherplease leave a message... 18:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * I hope this message finds you well. I respect your policy and I am willing to contribute in Wikipedia's journey keeping in my mind your policy.
 * The reason I cited from the my site is because almost no one is providing that information. And where did I get this information from? From the user reviews on facebook and youtube. I tried adding YouTube link as a reference but it is banned.
 * I hope you understand that the information and citations provided by me and my cite are completely trustable and I am honestly willing to contribute towards the goal of Wikipedia.
 * Towards your Success,
 * Ultimate writer.￼ Ultimate Writer (talk) 18:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)