User talk:Ultimate survi

Talk
Hi. Apolgies for deleting your edit request when I reverted your blanking of the rest of the page (which I presume was accidental). I was about to reinstate it, but I see you already did that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Delete my account Ultimate survi (talk) 16:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gwalior. Stop changing sourced population figures int eh articles. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Delete my account Ultimate survi (talk) 16:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia accounts can not be deleted. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

So unblock me to delete my two accounts Ultimate survi (talk) 18:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia accounts can not be deleted. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Unblock me to close my two accounts and use only this one to contribute Ultimate survi (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That will be up to the reviewing admin to decide. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

If have participated on the talk to seek consensus and I am not trying to hide it,I just want to contribute with reliable source so i want to delete it. And if you're talking about my approach in future so I have already apologize and promise to not do it again Ultimate survi (talk) 12:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Unblock

 * The problem is not just the simple act of misusing multiple accounts. You were using User:Liger1203, User:Sphinx120, User:Ultimate survi and editing logged out. With these, you repeatedly made unsourced and/or improperly sourced caste-related edits to Banaphar, Alha and Udal of Mahoba, including faking sources. And you made multiple inadequate edit requests on the talk pages which were declined (and which you have subsequently tried to hide). You were told (by me) multiple times to discuss your desired changes on the relevant talk pages and seek consensus, and I also explained the special importance of reliable sources and consensus when it comes to caste-related topics. You totally ignored all of this, and simply kept on trying to push your changes without discussion and without consensus. I would strongly oppose any unblock request that does not properly address all of these things, or which does not convincingly explain how you would change your approach in future if unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I forgot User:Mega flames. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

If have participated on the talk to seek consensus and I am not trying to hide it,I just want to contribute with reliable source so i want to delete it. And if you're talking about my approach in future so I have already apologize and promise to not do it again. Ultimate survi (talk) 12:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Where? Show us where you started a discussion of the source you object to and the sources you tried to use to replace it, and where you sought a consensus? Give us a diff, or just a link to any discussion you started. Just one. And no, you have not said anything about how you will change your approach to discussion and consensus - all you have promised is that you will not use multiple accounts any more. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

I have participate on all three you have to check first and you also reply me. Blame me only what I have done not on what you want Ultimate survi (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You have made multiple edit requests at times when the articles were protected, yes, but every one was declined. You then went on to make the changes yourself regardless, once the protection had expired - repeatedly, using different accounts. That is *not* discussing and seeking consensus. And yes, I have responded to at least one of your requests, (here). That was to point out the problems with your approach to sourcing, and most definitely *did not* represent a consensus for you to make the change. Anyway, I'll leave it for the next reviewing admin now. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes,thank you Ultimate survi (talk) 13:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)