User talk:Ultimateoutsider

December 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at New Delhi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

   Pro lix 💬 18:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mumbai. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Do not be disruptive. Discuss in talk page to gain WP:CONSENSUS. Do not edit war either. The Mumbai article is of GA status. Changes to existing content requires discussion.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at New Delhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Do not edit war. Discuss and get consensus as per WP:BRD.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kolkata; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.    Pro lix 💬 12:46, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Karnal. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * It has been taken from other citations.......nothing unsourced........its my home city, don't tell me whats right or wrong. Ultimateoutsider (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Add content with source. Doesn't matter if it is your home cty. You do not WP:OWN the article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that anywhere if you read it clearly. I just said that i know this city better than you and whole wikipedia community. Ultimateoutsider (talk) 17:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

I know how to read notifications you dumbhead. No need of you there in my talk page. Ultimateoutsider (talk) 08:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

ANI discussion
Due to the issues that have been discussed here at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and the evidence presented, it has become clear that your behavior has not improved. Because of this, I am blocking you for 48 hours. You're welcome to appeal your block by following the directions here. Please know that if your behavior does not improve after this block expires or is appealed, your next block will be extended or become indefinite until you appeal it.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your good gesture @Oshwah. I would like to tell you that my behavour will not change in near future and i am not scared of your stupid actions, but you don't have to worry to block me again cause i am already trying to deactivate my account. Ultimateoutsider (talk) 11:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm truly and honestly failing to understand why you won't just choose to contribute positively to the project and behave civilly with other users here. Is it that imperative to you that you get free reigns to insult and belittle others like that? You get warned (and then blocked) for uncivil and other behavior, and because of that, you retire? Really? If it's that important to you to be able to behave in the way that you do, which is something that's against Wikipedia's founding principles, then I'm sorry to say... this project isn't a good fit for you. :-/  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)