User talk:Ultrageek

GDLIB
I have added a "" template to the article GDLIB, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kathy A. 15:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Dauntless Rogue
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Dauntless Rogue, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dauntless Rogue
An article that you have been involved in editing, Dauntless Rogue, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Dauntless Rogue. Thank you. Marasmusine (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)