User talk:Ulughu Khan

April 2020
Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle of Badr, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 12:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Please see Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_172. Colonial ethnographers are not reliable sources. Also, have a look at WP:HISTRS in general. utcursch &#124; talk 22:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gurjar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''As explained above the source you used is not reliable enough. If you can find a reliable source to support this information, it can be added.'' Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 08:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Judaism and violence
Please revisit Judaism_and_violence and explain what you mean by "the new millennium". You might also want to reconsider using the term Middle East, which is not a historical term. Debresser (talk) 17:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarifying these issues in your subsequent edits. Debresser (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Topic ban warning
As you have been told, there is consensus on Wikipedia that British Raj etnographers are not reliable sources. If you continue to edit and edit war in defiance of that consensus, you are likely to be topic banned from articles on castes and social groups. Bishonen &#124; tålk 03:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC).

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Ulughu Khan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Rama have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: I have reverted some additional copyvio from Rama (content was copied from here) and from Daksha (close paraphrase of this). In addition, to copyvio issues, note that the writings of B.R Ambedkar are not a reliable source for history and religion except in so far as they are used to express his own views on the subject with proper attribution and only when due based on secondary sources. Abecedare (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Vedas, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  16:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

3RR
You have reverted now four times the rejection of your edits by three different editors at Vedas; discuss your proposals at the talkpage, and know for sure you will be blocked the next time you revert per WP:3RR. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  04:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I've written a proposal at Talk:Vedas. Think carefully about it; I'm doing the work you're supposed to do, and it may be saving your ass. Take care. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  13:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

permalink to archived ANI post -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive and tendentious editing as well as edit warring. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 16:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Judaism and violence
As an uninvolved editor, uninvolved in the block, I'd like to say, that I saw a good edit from this editor, and that I found him responsive to my follow-up request, see, and I think this editor will be able to contribute with quality edits to Wikipedia, if only he learns to stay clear from controversy. Debresser (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * their addition of the section Judaism and violence is off-topic, and the info is taken out of context. Instead of
 * more accurate would have been
 * This is not about "The rise of Christianity in the areas surrounding the Holy Land," but about the rise of mnotheism and the powerplay between various kingdoms and empires in the Arabian peninsula. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  03:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not about "The rise of Christianity in the areas surrounding the Holy Land," but about the rise of mnotheism and the powerplay between various kingdoms and empires in the Arabian peninsula. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  03:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not about "The rise of Christianity in the areas surrounding the Holy Land," but about the rise of mnotheism and the powerplay between various kingdoms and empires in the Arabian peninsula. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  03:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not about "The rise of Christianity in the areas surrounding the Holy Land," but about the rise of mnotheism and the powerplay between various kingdoms and empires in the Arabian peninsula. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  03:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Possible block evasion

 * please have a look at this revert at Judaism and violence by newbie User:Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar which re-inserted above-mentioned edit from Ulughu Khan; an obvious sock. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  04:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Assuming that was you. You are not helping yourself. This once again argues against your ability to be a member of a collaborative community of editors building an encyclopedia. We have clearly explained what is required to be unblocked. You have chosen a different path. Please read the portions of the WP:GAB about block evasion and WP:SOCKing. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)