User talk:Umairggness

Nomination of Monthly Sultan-ul-Faqr Magazine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monthly Sultan-ul-Faqr Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Monthly Sultan-ul-Faqr Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle  Faddle  14:14, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Please note that this discussion does not mean that the article will be deleted. It means it is being discussed, and that a consensus will be reached on whether it should remain. Your input is essential since you created the article. Since you are new to Wikipedia may I advise you first not to panic or be hasty in your reply at Articles for deletion/Monthly Sultan-ul-Faqr Magazine . A great speech is useless. Facts and improving the article are essential. Concentrate on facts alone and you stand a very good chance of the article being retained. Fiddle   Faddle  14:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Monthly Sultan-ul-Faqr Magazine has been reverted. Your edit here to Monthly Sultan-ul-Faqr Magazine was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://sultan-ul-faqr-jun-2013.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/mahnama-sultan-ul-faqr-june-2013.html#!|) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)