User talk:Umdenviro/sandbox

Ishy's Peer Review
Utilizing the "re-use" option when citing or referencing sources will help you create a more concise and clear references section by eliminating repeated entries, making it easier for readers to distinguish and identify where information is coming from. Additionally, it's really interesting to read about how people are using python's traditionally, and was wondering how hard it would be to find out more about the production processes of the medicines and substances that include python ingredients. Great work! Nom Chompsky (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review
Your information is very factual, which is good. Your topic isn't one where you would really need to take a side anyway. Pros:
 * The information you have so far is very informative
 * Information is separated by use
 * Lots of in-text links to other wikipedia articles (especially terms or concepts readers may be unfamiliar with)

Things I would change/improve (Question: Are you writing about all possible use of the ball python in Africa or places where it is most prevalent?)
 * That section that you have titled "Africa" should be where you introduce what exactly the rest of your article will be about. I assume you already know that though.
 * Maybe mention the species of python so the reader knows exactly which species your article is about (unless you're adding on to another article)

OlamideG (talk) 02:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)