User talk:Umedard/Archive 1

Advice
Don't remove warnings about unsourced images; fix them. Also, use categories and interwiki links in your articles (see what changes I made to them). Also please don't move your userpage, or create copies of it in places other then your userspace (see User page).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:JKACZYNSKI.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JKACZYNSKI.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Image-LechKACZYNSKI2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Image-LechKACZYNSKI2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:TheTwoWhoStoleTheMoon2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheTwoWhoStoleTheMoon2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

History of the Acadians
Hey, what's with all those links ( Madame d'Aulnay, Emmanuel LeBorgne, le sieur de Saint-Mas, Philippe Mius d’Entremont, Cap-de-Sable, Jeanne Motin) on the History of the Acadians page that you made? I'm more than aware that the article already has plenty of dead red links. Are you planning on going back through and making articles for those red links? Also, I'm sure you, as you took the time to read the article, you came across this name Charles de Saint-Étienne de la Tour - this is the link you are looking for for not *La Tour* which leads to an infinite list of various place names, mostly in France. Thank you for taking the time and going back and fixing those.DDD DDD 23:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Zebra
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Yamla 00:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Poland politics
To zwykly wandalizm, naprawilem - po prostu wystarczy skopiowac sekcje sprzed wandalizmu z historii. Pozdr,--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 01:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

2001
Hello! I saw that you added the category "2001 in Poland" to Law and Justice. I left a relevant note on the relevant talk page. Best, --Beaumont (@)  12:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:PiS maskotka.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:PiS maskotka.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Discussion
Hello. You might be interested in this debate - see the parts on Poland further down. I'd be interested in hearing your perspective there, as you know more about Poland than I do. Biruitorul 18:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

LK
Prawde mowiac ja nie sledze polskiej sceny politycznej na biezaco - sprobuj zapytac sie na WP:PWNB.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 20:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Uwaga
I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms
 * Marnie to wyjasnili, ale musisz ten tekst wkleic do 'edit summary' chyba.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 16:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Request
Hi Umedard, would you please take care to properly organize the articles, categories, and templates that you create. You may wish to review the links in your welcome message, especially the "Getting Started" section. Also, take a look at some featured articles to see how to properly arrange the article content. Happy editing, Appleseed (Talk) 16:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

link
Dzieki, przyda sie do artykulu o Dziadku :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 16:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Montelupich prison
I'm assuming that you were intending this article to be nominated for Did You Know. If that's the case, just remember to make your nominations here, rather than here. A couple of quick points as well:
 * It's normally the done thing to put the article you're nominating in bold (and linked to)
 * Stubs are ineligible for DYK, and that article is definitely one right at the moment.

Don't get disheartened, though. DYK's a strange beast sometimes, and I'm sure you'll be getting your nominations onto the front page soon enough. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Infobox County Poland
witam

Widziałem że stworzyłeś Template:Infobox Polish village i zastanawiałem się czy jesteś zainteresowany stworzeniem Infoboxa polskiego powiatu ? Jak narazie uzywalem Template:General geographic template, ale chyba chcą go zmieniać czy przenosić ale może już czas stworzyć inforbox dla polskiego powiatu ? Widziałem parę powiatow opisanych poprzez Template:Infobox Powiat, ale zbytnio nie jest czytelny i nie zawiera wszystkich dobrych pól.

Dzieki za odpowiedź − JDavid84 22:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Rosupda
Ja o tej rzecze nic nie wiem - proponuje napisac na WP:PWNB.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit
You removed links to three closely related articles in "Dunajec River Gorge" article section "See also" without a word of explanation. The links are there for a reason since those who read about the Gorge would certainly want to find out more about the river, the park, and the landmark. I believe it must have been an oversight on your part. The links are featured in the text all right but they stand out more under "See also". It doesn't hurt to have them there. Greetings. --Poeticbent  talk  03:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Linki istnieją w tekście więc postanowiłem je usunąć z See also. Nie widzę powodu dla którego powinny się tam znajdować. Jeśli jest inaczej proszę mnie poprawić, bo jak każdy mogłem popełnić błąd. Pozdrawiam.--Umedard Talk 03:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Byłem zdania, że takie linki należy usuwać. Gdzie mogę dowiedzieć się więcej na ten temat?


 * Thanks for the prompt responce. Like I said, it doesn't hurt to have the critical links featured separately. There are a lot of links in the article, but they are not so critical. For example, links to Geology of Europe, geomorphology, limestone, dolomite, botany, zoology, etc. "See also" links in my view are of greater importance. They lead to articles related to the story. Thanks again. --Poeticbent  talk  04:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Poland coat of arms stub
Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  04:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

North America (Americas) delete review
Thanks for voting and expressing your opinion about the article North America (Americas). As you know the debate was closed, and the result was "to delete it". Since I, as the creator of the article, thought the decision was hasty and wrong, I opened a |process to review the deletion.

This mean that administrators and regular editors can vote again and, most importantly, argument why the decision was wrong or right. Please, take a look at this and express your opinion:


 * North America (Americas), deletion review

Thanks for your time reading this message. AlexCovarrubias ( Let's talk! ) 22:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms
d

My RfA


Hello, thank you for supporting my RfA! I was promoted with a final tally of 68/12/0. Also, please wish a Happy Birthday to Her Majesty the Queen. Vivat Regina!

Signature
I don't know what happened here, but your signature is out of whack. Anny idea what's up?  ~ Mag nus an im um    (aka Steptrip) 14:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Lech Kaczyński
Please see Talk:Lech_Kaczyński.  Jacek  Kendysz  00:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Jarosław Kaczyński pic
Tell me, Umedard, did you really snap this photograph of Prime Minister Kaczyński yourself? -- Y not? 15:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If you don't, I will assume it's a copyright violation. Please respond. -- Y not? 02:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Gmina Niedźwiada
Napisz na talku o co ci chodzi, jak bedziesz dalej przesuwal te artykuly bez dyskusji dostaniesz bloka za disruption.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * OK - szczegoly do Balcera, bo on siedzi w gminach i takich tam bardziej niz ja. Na przyszlosc pisz na dyskusji i tam proponuj nowe nazwy.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Per List of communes in Poland, I believe that the consensus form is Niedźwiada Commune, i.e. we translate into English the Polish form "gmina". We already follow this practice with all the "powiats" (example Lubartów County). If you disagree, please discuss before moving articles. Balcer 22:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Tak, o ile wiem, jest uzgodnione że piszemy X Commune. Ma to sens, bo termin "gmina" jest nieznany poza Polską.  Oczywiście w samym artukule warto dodać  polską formę w pierwszym zdaniu, na przykład tak jak w Niedźwiada Commune.  Niestety, dalej jest bałagan, bo mamy Category:Gminas of Poland zamiast Category:Communes of Poland.  Ale wszystko jest do wyprostowania.
 * Gratuluję pracy przy artykułach o okolicach Lublina. Balcer 23:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:1989_jaroslaw_e_lech_kaczynski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1989_jaroslaw_e_lech_kaczynski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:BogdanKacmajor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BogdanKacmajor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:PiS logo.svg
Hello Umedard, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:PiS logo.svg) was found at the following location: User:Umedard. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:PiS logo.svg
Hello Umedard, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:PiS logo.svg) was found at the following location: User:Umedard/PiS Wikipedians. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Having your own page deleted
If you create a page, and before anyone else edits it you decide to have it deleted, like what seems to have happened with Category:Gmina of Abramów, please put a   at the top of the page, in stead of blanking it. This will attract an administrator to it to have it deleted. I've marked this one for you - since you blanked it, that's enough. Od Mishehu 10:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of John S. Mitchell III
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on John S. Mitchell III, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because John S. Mitchell III seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting John S. Mitchell III, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate John S. Mitchell III itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bph.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bph.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:1989_jaroslaw_e_lech_kaczynski.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:1989_jaroslaw_e_lech_kaczynski.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)