User talk:Umsunu Wabo

July 2017
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Daniil Kvyat have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Umsunu Wabo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 * You have removed the prior messages on your page so I cannot strike the last one as I was about to agree that your edit does not deserve a "final warning." These pages still remain in your history. Also, I continue to think the edit to which the last warning referred is still inappropriate as phrased and does not take into consideration the guidelines in the pages that I cited above. It is not up to the reader or editor to find and cite sources that support controversial edits, especially those that may disparage a living person or put them in a bad light. See the links I cite above concerning biographies of living persons and verifiability. The procedure to cite sources can be found in citing sources or help footnotes also linked above. Please also be careful not to use text from a copyrighted source unless you use a small number of words and identify it as a quotation (fair use). Your edit also uses slang and has a speculative ending. Again, see the links above and Manual of Style/Words to watch. If your deletion of the guideline pages means you do not intend to follow the guidelines, you are likely to find your further edits will be reverted and you seriously risk being blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 04:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Oracle Cloud have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 19:14, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bell Pottinger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 19:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arón Canet has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arón Canet was changed by Umsunu Wabo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950939 on 2018-04-06T16:43:40+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Williams Grand Prix Engineering. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RafaelS1979 (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arón Canet, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Darwin Awards - talkpage discussion
Hello Umsunu Wabo, please join the discussion at the article's talkpage about these so-called notable "winners" instead of re-inserting the deleted list. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 19:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kyle Busch have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Kpgj hpjm  04:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Valtteri Bottas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RafaelS1979 (talk) 19:51, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, I'm Khruner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Romano Fenati have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Khruner (talk) 20:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stevenage, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 14:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lists of disasters. Dawnseeker2000 18:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to 2020 Formula One World Championship has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. ''The Dutch Grand Prix is expected to be held in May. This is speculation and is likly to be so until next years calender is realsed. Thanks, SSSB (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)'' SSSB (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height

October 2019
Hello, I'm SSSB. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2019 Japanese Grand Prix, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SSSB (talk) 19:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sumay Allison


A tag has been placed on Sumay Allison requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sumay Allison, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Considering the amount of disruptive and unconstructive editing you have done, and the large number of warnings you have received, it is remarkable that you have hitherto been blocked from editing only once, and that once for only a few days. You have now been blocked from editing for a much longer period. The extent of your disruptive editing, and your totally ignoring warnings and other messages, is more than enough to justify an indefinite block, but in view of the fact that you have only had one short block before, I have compromised, and given a longer but limited block. However, you may well be blocked indefinitely if you continue in the same way after this block ends. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of this page:. JBW (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ronnie O'Sullivan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commentator. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Football hooliganism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Impairment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Washington Redskins name controversy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Swagging (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2019 French Grand Prix, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -Melecie- talk! 06:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Secunda, Mpumalanga
 * added a link pointing to JSE
 * Sinenjongo High School
 * added a link pointing to Impairment

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of European Fecal Standards and Measurements for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Fecal Standards and Measurements is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/European Fecal Standards and Measurements until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Partofthemachine (talk) 20:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of European Fecal Standards and Measurements


A tag has been placed on European Fecal Standards and Measurements requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 15 (talk) 21:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Secunda, Mpumalanga, you may be blocked from editing. &#32;- Sumanuil (talk) 23:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for trying to make a contribution, I just noted the picture was deleted for no reason and reverted it back to its former state Umsunu Wabo (talk) 05:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Courtesy notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  21:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)