User talk:UnaLaguna/Archive01

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ageo020 07:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Don't get worked up
I noticed you got a little heated with Smith Jones, well don't bother. He's a very insidious troll and vandal that hasn't done anything cut and dried enough to get blocked yet. Just thought I'd let you know. NeoFreak 07:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Info taken on board. Thanks for pointing that out (it's probably more obvious to people with more experience here than me >_>). UnaLaguna 07:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Eragon (video game) GA On Hold
Please see the game's talk page for details. Nothing major, just a few items related to clarity. It shouldn't take more than an hour to fix. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ speak ○ see ○ 20:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Eragon
High five and congrats on getting Eragon up to GA.


 * lol and your welcome. Hey lagoon, are you going to add it to the Featured content of WPIT?--Clyde (talk) 15:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Good articles, good idea... you seem to have no shortage of them! UnaLaguna 20:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I have fewer to my name then you realize, but I appreciate the compliment.--Clyde (talk) 16:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

archive
i put the archive "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smith_Jones/Archive02" here. what are you talking boaut?


 * Hmm. The link you put on your talk page to the article linked to User Talk:Smith Jones/Archive02, not User:Smith Jones/Archive02. It made sense putting the archive in User Talk, as it's an archive of the User Talk page rather than the User page itself. Plus, User Talk:Smith Jones/Archive02 is consistent with User Talk:Smith Jones/Archive01. One of them, probably the one you linked me to just above (User:Smith Jones/Archive02), should probably be deleted. UnaLaguna 05:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hey, um, about that Barnstar I gave you, sorry if it was in an inconvenient place at the top of your user page....it was my first ever award that I handed out so I didn't really know where to put it.

Enjoy, Arknascar44 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Your Userpage
Don't worry! I took my inspiration for my userpage from my Wikipedia idol. Regards, Arknascar44 21:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

email
my email address is enetered when i log in —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smith Jones (talk • contribs)

Feedback on SimCity 4
Thank you very much for your feedback on SimCity 4, I did need to be given a direction on what to do with the article! Camaron1 | Chris 19:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

sorry, i found that the page had been vandalised and tried to fix one bit, changing 99 to 19 as i thought that was correct and it was definately better than 99, but i was unsure if 19 was correct. i wasn't aware of the sandbox and will use it in the fture, i reported the vandalism so that someone more informed could look into it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.144.135 (talk) 11:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Problem solved!
Problem solved, dear Una :) Let me know if I can help you in any other way, k? Have a beautiful day,  P h a e d r i e l  - 06:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Major League Baseball
Why thank you, I am honoured and shall do my utmost to live up to the award. I started a leadless, POV, written like a 15-year old article on another video game that was going to be my next project, but after spending an hour getting nowhere in getting screenshots (the game is freaking impossible), I'll be working on other tasks for a bit. I'm so embarrassed by the current quality of the article, that I won't mention which one it is, but when I do get it up to code and put it up for peer review, I'll let you know. Cheers, CP 16:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, since you saw my table (the one I stole from User:AnonEMouse), you've probably guessed that the above mentioned game is Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (video game). I've at least brought it up to something I wouldn't be embarrassed asking for some help on, so I think I shall ask you, since you're pretty damn good at that. If you're busy or would prefer that I formal request that it be peer reviewed, just let me know. Oh yeah, and I looked at the review you gave for MLB and tried to make sure that this article met all the points made there, so that you wouldn't have to repeat yourself. I am a bit concerned that I've done some irrelevant overlinking (especially when describing the game elements), but the text is devoid of Wikilinking past the development section without them. I want to get it to B Class first (it was rightly rated Start in its initial form, though I think I've improved on it since then) and then prep it for a GA nom. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, CP 03:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review! I'll look over it tonight, clean things up, then nominate it for GA once one of my other two noms is passed or failed. Would you say that the article is a B as it stands though? Cheers, CP 22:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Movie Battles Review
Since i think you dont check WikiProject_Video_games/Peer_review/Movie_Battles anymore xD (which is my fault since i forgot about it), i thought i could tell you this way.

I have now added alot of sources (some of them are on the official MB site, but better than nothing tbh), i also changed a few other things and added a screenshot..

So could you plz look at the Movie Battles article again and see if its better in ur opinion. Remember my goal is to get the article to at least a B rating so, lets hope i succeed. ;) Thanks  Y zm o  talk  16:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

For Helping me alot with the Movie Battles article, and helping me to get it to B status, i give you the SW barnstar :D  Y zm o   talk  16:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Intellectual Property Theft
How dare you! Why, I have half a mind to report this to the proper authorities! Haha. Cheers, CP 20:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Images
Yep I noticed - I just logged in to send a message to the deleter. By the time I saw your message, the images were gone. I know that Incredible Technologies has submitted letters to Wikipedia noting the right to free use of these images. The problem is, I don't know how to "stamp" them to note this fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigreye007 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

BioShock Peer review
Hi, I have made some of your suggested changes, could you come back and tell me what you think? -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 07:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Enjoy!
Have a fun and relaxing vaction Laguna! Crimsonfox 11:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Haha, thanks man. I'm sure I will. Una LagunaTalk 15:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Movie Battles GA
The MBII atricle has now been GA Reviewed and is on hold. It passed on everything except WP:WTA. Which i think i have fixed, but it would be really nice if you could double-check it. I see that you are on holidays ATM, but if u get online.. plz check it.. Thx  Y zm o  talk  12:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

CVG Barnstar
Thanks, man! Much appreciated! :D Una LagunaTalk 21:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Seriously, your work on the VG Assessment page is great. I originally created that page but I've only contributed a few assessment myself. What you're doing really helps to get new users involved in the community: some of the articles being requested for review are not great at all, and it would be easy to be cynical to the contributors. Your constructive criticism is exactly the reason I created the page in the first place. JACO  PLANE  &bull; 2007-11-2 22:51

Over the Hedge (Nintendo DS) quickie assessment
Hi there, you may or may not be aware of the discussions surrounding this article and the proposed merge to the main over the hedge game article. The agreement was that the article should be a good start class by February, though after reading about the darned thing I thought I'd just get it done myself. Now I'd just like another pair of eyes to see if I've left or botched anything, so I can get on with something else. You're quite at liberty to tell me to nick off, so don't feel like you have to, likewise there's no hurry at all you can do it in months or weeks time.

Couple of notes: There's no information out there to create a development section, and the current headers within the article are the only sections I'd really want to complete. I'm finishing up the reception section now and would then like to address any corrections or omissions. Regardless of whether or not you're able to have a look, thanks for your ongoing work on the project. Someone another 15:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Done. The pleasure is always mine. Una LagunaTalk 16:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: User talk:Sunny910910
Thanks for the complement!--Sunny910910 (talk 22:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Mega Man ZX Advent assessment question.
Out of curiosity... Mega Man ZX Advent is a sequel, and thus, there are a lot of aspects (such as the technological premise and setting) that are identical to its predecessor. I bring this up because you suggested a "Technology" section. I know of the importance of making articles stand-alone, but it seems a little redundant to elaborate on these details again when they're so unchanged from the first game. Would it be suitable enough to just reference the first game's article? -Crimsonseiko 23:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I also added some responses to your assessment on the game's talk page. Lemme know what you think. -Crimsonseiko 00:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Assessment of Brood War
Please see Talk:StarCraft:_Brood_War. -- Sabre 17:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Movie Battles FAC
Hehe, sorry for bugging you about this like all the time, but i thought u might want to know that i just nominated the Movie Battles. I think the article is as good as it can get.. so why not.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Movie_Battles  Y zm o  talk  21:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

TimeSplitters 2
I believe you assessed the article I requested. I have tried to improve it so tell me if I completed some of the points you listed.

Do the pictures all have fair use rationals now? Is the gameplay section a little bit better? Is reception better at all? I completely re-did it. I can't expand the plot much more because there's not much story in the game. I did, however, add another picture to the Plot section. I still need to add more citations. Also, if I would like to pursue a Good-article status, would I have to nominate the game or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wi Account ki (talk • contribs) 01:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Appreciate the assessment!
Hi UnaLaguna,

Just wanted to stop by and thank you for taking the time to assess Super Mario Galaxy. We'll get to work on the points you mentioned (and be sure to pester you with questions if we have any)! --jonny-mt(t)(c) Tell me what you think! 08:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Overlord Assessment?
I'm not sure how the whole assessment/peer review system works but I'm working toward improving the Overlord (2007 game) article which is still at start but has been expanded and improved since then, even if its not B class I'd still like to know what needs to be improved.

Thanks, I ask you because I've seen involvment in others, most recently Super Mario Galaxy. Stabby Joe 12:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Well I've done what you've requested 9except that other matter we're dicussing on the talk page). Stabby Joe 14:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks a ton for the tips at Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War: Dark Crusade! I asked quite a few questions (sorry), so I figured I'd let you know here and save you from having to dredge your watchlist. Cheeers! Master of Puppets Care to share?  16:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I addressed most of your concerns about the article; all I'm working on now is the development section. If it isn't too much trouble, could you skim over and see how I'm doing? Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share?  06:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry for continually pestering you, but I was wondering if you could look over the Dark Crusade article. I'd like to know what else I can improve before school starts up and I get busier. Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share?  22:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Forgive me for forgetting - I'll try and write something useful tomorrow. Una LagunaTalk 23:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * No, it's no problem. Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share?  01:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

StarCraft series assessment
Thanks for the assessment! However, you left conflicting ratings: you put B in the template and on the assessment page, but Start in your comments on the talk page. I'm guessing that its supposed to be B as it was used twice, but can you clarify the rating in your comment?

I'll see what I can do on the article, but surely a reception section for a series is a cultural impact section as its not dealing with the specific reviews of each game? I sort of rushed that section, I only used information already on WP rather than finding new stuff, but I'm confident of more cultural impact stuff that is non-Korean. Also, isn't a gameplay section something more suited to the individual game articles rather than the series overview one? Especially considering there's a (postponed) game of a different genre in the series. I'm also unclear exactly how to use screenshots for this article, again it strikes me as more of a game specific thing. However, I'm basing this mainly off of Halo series, as I can't see that I can get the level of detail as in Final Fantasy. -- Sabre 20:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Multi-Racing Championship
I've edited Multi-Racing Championship a few days and I think I'm done with the article. Do you think it's still Stub-class or could it be rated Start-class? --Mika1h (talk) 18:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

SH4 VGA

 * 1) I've gotten the plot summary reformatted and reffed. Take a look to tell me if it looks good.
 * 2) I assumed that Image:Sh4cvfight.jpg would demonstrate typical gameplay. It appears to have all the major elements (Henry, Eileen, the inventory, the health bar, a ghost enemy.)
 * 3) And one of these days I will try to fix up some of the paragraphs. --Lenin and McCarthy |  (Complain here) 03:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Tried beefing up the paragraphs. How much more do you think it needs? --Lenin and McCarthy |  (Complain here) 05:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I tried to write a bit of a sequel section, but it ended up being too small for a whole section, so I threw it into "history". --Lenin and McCarthy |  (Complain here) 06:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Cutscene Screenshots
I noticed you have screenshots of Jedi Outcast cutsences. How did you take those? Printscreen? Quietmartialartist (talk) 14:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * As I recall, I used Xfire's screenshot feature (Scoll Lock S) as it allowed me to take loads of screenshots whilst only sitting through the cutscene once. I find printscreen very hit-and-miss so no longer use it. Una LagunaTalk 15:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Your copyedit request
On 15 August 2007, you made a request to the League of Copyeditors for a copyedit on Star Wars Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast. Because of a heavy backlog and a shortage of copyeditors, we have been unable to act on your request in a timely manner, for which we aplogize. Since your request, this article has been subject to significant editing and may no longer be a good candidate for copyediting by the League. If you still wish the League to copyedit this article, please review this article against our new criteria and follow the instructions on the Requests page. This will include your request in our new system, where it should receive more prompt attention. Finetooth (talk) 19:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Dancing Stage MegaMiX peer review
Since you say all one must do is ask, would you be interested in giving this article a peer review? It's been posted for a while and little has been said to the state of the article. I would like to at least get it in position for a GA ranking. Thank you --AeronPrometheus (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for giving the page a look over, I haven't had time to respond to it because I'm focusing on other things at the moment, sorry. I do have some questions but I'll ask them later when I can get around to applying changes to the page. Again thank you. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Glad to be of assistance :) Una LagunaTalk 18:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Godzilla: Unleashed Assessment?
I was wondering if this was B class? I've made plenty of edits to it (added reception, rewrote intro, gameplay and characters and editted development) which I feel go beyond Start class. Stabby Joe (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Album's Artwork or Albums Artwork
It's a double album and the artwork for each disc (and the their separate packaging) was produced by the artist mentioned. So... album's, albums or albums'? (Happiness is the road - Marillion) :D Stephenjh (talk) 11:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * This is getting very picky :P but the first sentence of the lead refers to it as one album (released in two parts). So I'd say album's and not albums' as it's still one album, even if it's released in two parts. For sure, it definitely needs an apostrophe as it's the artwork belonging to the album. Una LagunaTalk 16:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

"Differences from book" section for Eragon (film)
I am just wondering why a section like that is okay for the Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter. Would more links and a "comparison to source material" approach be acceptable? It seems natural to me that an article of a movie based on a book would at least mention how if it is different from the book.JesusFreak89 (talk) 22:55, 21 October 2008 (UTC)JesusFreak89


 * First thing first, check out WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Wikipedia is a work in progress and therefore incomplete. One cannot say "X is done in this article, so it must be okay to do it in another article". I had this a lot back when I assessed video game articles: people would have game-guide-esque lists of weapons and levels and other unencyclopedic stuff, and assert that they could do that because other articles had these things (even though those articles were complete rubbish!) If you're talking about this article and ones like it, then those aren't good examples.


 * As a general rule, a subject should only be covered on Wikipedia if it has been discussed in reliable sources; otherwise the subject doesn't pass Wikipedia's notability criteria. The differences between the LOTR books and films have been discussed in multiple reliable sources; therefore it is notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. The differences between the Eragon book and film section have not been discussed in-depth in reliable sources.


 * Also note the differences between this section discussing differences between the LOTR books and films, and what many users have tried to add to Eragon (film) (simply list the differences). Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of information and Wikipedia is not a guide. Analysis of the differences, if discussed in reliable source/s would be fine, but simply listing the differences between book and film adds very little useful content to the article.


 * I hope this clarifies things for you. Una LagunaTalk 07:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

hello una lungana
i added a bunch of stuff on to the page thank you very much (Lone Fox the last of the foxes (talk) 20:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC))
 * You're welcome...? Una LagunaTalk 07:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Star Wars: Dark Forces
Hey UnaLaguna. You're a prominent editor to the Dark Forces/Jedi Knight articles so I thought I'd ask for your opinion. As you know I've been cleaning up the articles in the series, and Dark Forces was tagged for cleanup in a few areas and suffering from a few issues so I rewrote it, however the new version was reverted as I didn't have consensus for the edits. I'd appreciate if you'd come give your opinion on the changes I made. Here's the new version and the version that is currently in place. Thanks, Bill (talk 16:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Planescape: Torment GA review
Hey there! In case you haven't seen, Planescape: Torment has been nominated as a Good Article, and the review has been placed on hold; some issues need to be resolved, so have a look at the review page and discuss the issues and let's get to work! BOZ (talk) 20:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Octavarium
Very well. I'll get back to it when i have time. Fortunately, it's still saved in the history. --J miester25 (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * There's probably loads of information discussing Octavarium and the specific point you mentioned on the Internet; the difficulty is to find the sites which count as reliable sources to back it up. Una LagunaTalk 08:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Eragon
Thanks for the edit, ill add those into the individual book synopses instead, although im adding a link at each book, something like, For More information please refer to the synopses on insert book title here

kenshin (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Adultlink210kenshin (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

notice
Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Star Wars: Jedi Knight. Nergaal (talk) 01:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Overlord II
Hello, if you remember remember me, I greatly improved the article for Overlord (2007 video game), so naturally I would do the same for it's sequel Overlord II. While I've improved this new article in the same manner, I know there's a lot to be done. Since you were extremely helpful in assessing and guiding certain improvements, I would trust your judgment once again. If you're not busy elsewhere on this site I would appreciate a peer-assessment of the Overlord II article greatly since now I think it's at least passed Start-Class. Stabby Joe (talk) 10:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I haven't done an assessment in ages, but it would be my pleasure to take a look over the article. Una LagunaTalk 11:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * One year later (I've been busy, REALLY busy) and I've finally got around to tweaking the article. Stabby Joe (talk) 23:27, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (video game)
Hello. I've finished my assessment of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (video game) and place the article on hold. My comments can be found on the talk page. Let me know if you have any concerns. Cheers, CP 05:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
I've made some improvements to the article as you recommended. More coming. –MuZemike 01:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

A-class assessment
I started the assessment for the The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (video game) and posted some comments. GamerPro64 (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Arsenal of Democracy
Thanks for the feedback. That was significantly more in depth than I was expecting. I'll try to put it to good use. --Doink9731 (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem! If you have any other queries just ask away :) Una LagunaTalk 16:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Question
Thanks for the Club Penguin peer review. I have a question, though: Would the room-list and stage-play-list be game-guide-like? -- Ha  dg  er  04:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I would say yes, they are game-guide-esque, as they mean nothing to someone who's never played the game. The two bits of prose describing them can probably be trimmed down a bit and stay, as a basic description of the environment/stage is useful to the player. Una LagunaTalk 10:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Also, about the lead section not needing sources thing, I will put some of the lead section text into the main body of the article (not by copying-and-pasting), but maybe if the sources from the lead section of the article were removed, that would lead to argument about the lead section being unsourced. Are you sure the sources in the lead section should be deleted? -- Ha  dg  er  01:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * What I meant was that the lead section doesn't need citations if the information given in it appears elsewhere in the article and is cited. So don't delete the sources - cut and paste them to where you're sticking the info in the main article body. Una LagunaTalk 08:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. I kept the sources even though I copied-and-pasted the sources into the main body of the article. I don't want to lead to arguments of the lead section of the article being unsourced (like I said before). -- Ha  dg  er  18:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

I am sorry for all the questions, but would the What They Play site be a reliable source? -- Ha  dg  er  18:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, questions are always awesome. A website is reliable if there is some form of editorial oversight of its content. A site with content only posted by official staff/volunteers is reliable (e.g. IGN, GameSpot); a site where anybody can post pretty much anything is not a reliable source (e.g. IMDB). So What They Play would count as a reliable source. Una LagunaTalk 20:04, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- Ha  dg  er  22:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Another question: Would the ESRB official site count as a primary source for Club Penguin's rating, or would it be a good source? -- Ha  dg  er  20:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * With something as basic as the game's ESRB rating, a link to the official ESRB website should be fine. Una LagunaTalk 08:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Office of Strategic Influence (album)
Hi.

I figured you will talk to me, the article is indeed worth a B, but lacks one element, it has only two categories, in fact technically it would be a stub because it lacks artist category; so artist, genre, country and pretty much any other categories you can think of or find in FA and GA, would not only get it to B but help you to get to GA, also a sample would get you in the best track. If you will, i shall rate it a B so you don`t have to request an reassessemnt again. Don`t hesitate to ask if anything else comes up. Zidane tribal (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I see that the category doesn`t exist, i`ll creat it, if it is OK with you?. Zidane tribal (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2010 (UTC)




 * Many thanks for your feedback, and adding/creating the categories. If I come across any more relevant categories I'll be sure to add them, and I'll get to work on a sample. If I have any questions I'll be sure to ask. Again, thanks! Una LagunaTalk 22:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Peer review
Just to let you know, I've added some comments on The Lord of the Rings peer review. Thanks, -- The Taerkasten ( talk ) 21:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Request regarding The Root of All Evil
Thank you for sending me the message regarding Dream Theater's "The Root of All Evil." However, before you delete the article, I respectfully request that you consider merging all the articles about the songs of Dream Theater's Twelve-step Suite into the main article about the aforementioned suite before the deletion process commences. Please reply as soon as possible. Thank you. Mr. Brain (talk) 01:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think there's much (if any) useful content from the original pages which should be merged into Twelve-step Suite. The main article needs a tidy-up, for sure, but considering that all the information on the individual song articles is unsourced (mostly original research), I don't think there's anything which immediately needs merging. I will get to work expanding the main article, though. Una LagunaTalk 09:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Robert Hart (musician)
Im reverting them because I work for Robert Hart, and have many legal documents proving that what is stated on here is true...i.e the chart position song such as angel have actually achieved. This includes Gold discs in the office direct from the record companies and Billboard. There is an issue with the Billboard's website that us here at the K Hart Inc music company who handles Robert Hart's affairs are currently trying to rectify. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.231.245.114 (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Office of Strategic Influence (album)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Office of Strategic Influence (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 14:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Free (OSI album)
The article Free (OSI album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Free (OSI album) for things which need to be addressed. S Masters (talk) 08:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Free (OSI album)
The article Free (OSI album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Free (OSI album) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! S Masters (talk) 04:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Nice Photo
El Cajas is I think one of the most beautiful places on earth. Nice photo! Slrubenstein  |  Talk 18:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Haha, thanks! I found it by Googling "Una Laguna" and decided it was pretty enough to stick on my page. Una LagunaTalk 18:32, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Ah, you should go, one day. Slrubenstein  |  Talk 18:36, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blood (OSI album)
The article Blood (OSI album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Blood (OSI album) for things which need to be addressed.  C  anniba loki  19:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Octavarium (album)
The article Octavarium (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Octavarium (album) for things which need to be addressed.  C  anniba loki  19:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination has gone through a second opinion. It would require your attention, as there are a few more minor changes to make. Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  19:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Opeth acts
I don't think you were quite clear with the acts like removing arch enemy. Explain. M4pnt (talk) 02:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I explained my reasons for removing the acts here. I am implementing the often-neglected guidelines at Template:Infobox Musical artist, which states that, among other things, acts with just one member in common should not be listed. If you think there is a strong reason, based on these guidelines, for the addition of bands such as Arch Enemy, then please give them at here.


 * Thanks, Una LagunaTalk 13:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of OSI (band)
The article OSI (band) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within a month, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:OSI (band) for things which need to be addressed. Crowz RSA  21:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Graveyard Mountain Home
The article Graveyard Mountain Home you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Graveyard Mountain Home for things which need to be addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There are still a few things that need to be addressed before I can list it. Adabow (talk · contribs) 23:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the delay! I think I've fixed everything now. Una LagunaTalk 17:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

GAR
Hi. I'm just letting you know about this. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks - posting on the JKII talk page now. Una LagunaTalk 21:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Can you comment further on Progressive Rock talk page?
Hi UnaLaguna, I've responded to your last comment, basically that I think we should dump all of Christgau's reviews, definitely not cherry-pick them. Am interested to hear your thoughts. Cheers! Academic38 (talk) 05:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Ring of Red
One thing that amazes me about that page is there is still no map of Japan despite the availably of such. I can put on in there, but I don't know how.--184.77.10.72 (talk) 21:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)