User talk:Unbiased&fair

Welcome!
Hello, Unbiased&#38;fair, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Auric   talk  00:07, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Roy Maloy
Regarding your edits to insert the term "Australian Circus King" in the pages's infobox; to avoid having your edits reverted you need to discuss proposed changes on the articles talk page first as consensus has been reached. The discussion is under "Career" on the talk page. Also familairise yourself with WP:AGF FlatOut 05:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Given your consistent persecution of this one page, to assume your good faith would be erroneous. The article will continue to be edited and referenced with the indisputable facts. I look forward to it. Unbiased&#38;fair (talk) 06:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Your failure to assume good faith here is troubling. One reference using a phrase does not show that the phrase is "widely" used. Please reconsider your approach to other editors. You are entitled to think Roy Maloy is wonderful, and the other editor is entitled to think that he is over-rated. The article must be scrupulously neutral. Discuss article content instead of speculating about motives, please.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  15:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not certain what you are looking at, but there is quite a lot more than one reference to Maloy being 'Australias Circus King'. I would concede 'Australias Extreme Circus King' is perhaps a little more accurate, but the title stands nonetheless. As to your implication that I think he is 'wonderful'; that is far from the truth. I am on the side of truth and it concerns me that the constant vandalism of this page is taken so lightly. Unbiased&#38;fair (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If you wish to make an edit then it has to done in the correct way. So far only one independent reference has been cited (http://www.google.com.au/search?gl=au&pz=1&cf=all&ned=au&hl=en&authuser=0&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22roy%20maloy%22%20%22King%22&sa=N&tab=nw&ei=cyBhUaS8DeiUiAe) doesn't count. You also need to discuss changes where there is existing debate. Go to the article's talk page, propose an edit and include your references. Consensus needs to be reached. Edits you disagree with don't constitute Vandalism. FlatOut 08:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Please ensure you sign your posts. Slander such as 'is a mysogynistic pig who abuses women' IS vandalism. Unbiased&#38;fair (talk) 07:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
(Removing personal attack from). FlatOut 13:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Reliable Sources Noticeboard
This is to inform all interested editors that there is a discussion underway at Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding one of the references in the article Roy Maloy. Input from all interested editors is invited.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  20:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)