User talk:UnbiasedVictory


 * It's no problem at all, thank you for taking the time to view and accept my request. UnbiasedVictory (talk) 22:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Colonial militia in Canada, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You can't just say that none of what you included is incorrect. BC  talk to me  21:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Just for the record, nobody has any particular reason to doubt that you're acting in good faith, but due to Wikipedia's open "anyone can edit" structure we do have a problem with people actually adding inaccuracies and outright falsehoods to our articles. So if you're going to change information in an article, please ensure that you're actually citing it to a reliable source by which we can verify that your edit is actually correct — this is especially critical if you're going against what another source in the article already says. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I understand, I've only added battles in which Canadian militia were known for participating and prevailing in, which the article had already listed without references so I didn't feel it was obligatory to provide one myself. I apologize for the confusion. UnbiasedVictory (talk) 01:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Standard offer
See
 * 1) Sockpuppet investigations/UnbiasedVictory
 * 2) this reqest (3:38, 18 December 2015)
 * 3) Not done (06:58, 19 December 2015)
 * 4) this exchange (07:56, 19 December 2015)

You can either force other editors to play Wack a Rat and stay blocked indefinitely or you can follow the advise in the essay Standard offer keep to its terms and then apply at Steward requests/Global for the account User:UnbiasedVictory to be unblocked. As you can only do that by using a sock puppet account, I suggest that you consider using Unblock Ticket Request System or email the Arbitration Committee as detailed at WP:BASC, requesting that someone else applies to Steward requests/Global for you once you have followed the advise in the standard offer. -- PBS (talk) 00:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Keiiri (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)