User talk:Unbraceyourself

Welcome!
Hello, Unbraceyourself, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Alexbrn (talk) 09:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Clear aligners. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 10:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Clear aligners, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 10:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Clear aligners. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Fiddle   Faddle  17:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Now we have your attention, please take a pace back and understand what we need. And it is references, the more so when making changes. You will see that I reverted your edit with a comment about references. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make edits acceptable, even of potentially controversial. Better, though, is to build a consensus on the article;s talk page for things you think may cause a challenge or that have caused a challenge.
 * After a few days with no input one may consider that consensus 'nemine contradicet' has been established, but one must still be cautious. Fiddle   Faddle  18:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Clear aligners
The Clear aligners article has been controversial in the past with disputes over its encyclopedic tone, and whether the material was unduly promotional. Therefore, standard procedures are more quickly and strongly enforced than might be normal for a topic like this. What that means is that there would need to be a reason for additional companies such as ClearCaps to be mentioned. In Wikipedia's terms, a suitable reason would be if independent reliable sources had done more than briefly mention the company—see WP:RS. After a quick search I was unable to locate such sources. If you know of any, please list them at Talk:Clear aligners. You could do that by clicking "edit" next to the "Promotions" section heading, or by clicking "new section" at the top of the page. See the article for examples that apply to the companies mentioned. See WP:HELPDESK for any how-to questions. Johnuniq (talk) 06:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)