User talk:Unclefishbits

Edits on Rainforest Action Network page
Hey buddy, I noticed that you deleted a couple of edits (which I spent quite a while on) on the Rainforest Action Network page, under the Criticisms section. Your comment was "the paragraph removed is speculative, and has nothing to do with criticism. It's a rebuttal within a subtopic. It doesn't belong there." I'm really not sure what you mean by saying it's "speculative" - can you clarify?

I understand saying that it's "a rebuttal within a subtopic" - but if I had a nickel for every time a Criticisms section on Wikipedia also contained a rebuttal of that criticism, then I would have a lot of nickels. And where else should one present information that balances out a criticism? isn't that a valid and important piece of information that should be included in an article on a topic?

Full disclosure: I used to work for RAN. But I have plenty of criticisms of the organization (note that I didn't say anything about the criticism of RAN's membership in the FSC, because I happen to agree with it). I just thought that this particular criticism was somewhat bizarre & based on very weak sources, and wanted to balance the criticism out in order to present a more NPOV perspective overall.

I'm totally open to suggestions about how this could be done better - I'm hardly a Wikipedia expert.CircleAdrian (talk) 06:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Lgo-cavallo08.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Lgo-cavallo08.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense of Ted time
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ted time, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ted time provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ted time, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Wilbur Hot Springs
Hi - I moved your article to it's proper name Wilbur Hot Springs (without quotes). The one version with quotes will be deleted shortly. Please edit this version going forward Wilbur Hot Springs. Also, can I politely suggest that you take a quick look at WP:REF for details on references/citations. Your article is full of references, which is great, but they are currently setup as external links rather than citations. Thanks. --  7   undefined   23:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Great
Looks like you are off to a good start fixing the references... Maybe a few things to cleanup with the titles, but you'll get there. If you need help just let me know. --  7   talk   23:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh my gosh this isn't easy. I am still working on this... I promise. I actually have a job (heaven forbid) and haven't had time!!! I apologize. I am also excited to say I have wonderful new resources coming along... old dusty books from the 1890's! YAY!!!

Speedy deletion nomination of "Lake Allison"
A tag has been placed on "Lake Allison" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Why I tagged your "Lake Allison" article
The "History" section is taken word-for-word from the pdf http://www.springbrookproperties.com/downloads/Allison_Name_Fact_Sheet.pdf. According to longstanding policy, Wikipedia can't accept copyright violations. Please read WP:COPYVIO for a further explanation -- and please don't remove the tag unless the copyright violations are appropriately fixed. Thanks! -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, when the copyright violations are fixed, we can move the article to Lake Allison, without the quotes. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh yeah... I keep putting the quotes. Pardon that!

Lake Allison
I fixed a large chunk of it. Still, I think you should cite the original hotel brochure since the article still paraphrases it. Better yet, you could tweak the text further: a hotel brochure is not exactly a reliable source! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)