User talk:Unconciousobserver2

Deletion process for Mika McKinnon
Hi! When nominating an article for deletion, it's very important to follow the complete process thoroughly so that the article can get a proper discussion. Reviewing the process laid out at WP:AFD, there were several problems with your nomination: As a new editor, I would encourage you to spend time improving articles and building experience with the notability rules and AfD process before nominating articles for deletion. Wikipedia editors take deletion discussions very seriously, so creating a deletion nomination pulls in a lot of work from a lot of other editors. If a deletion discussion does not have a good justification, this creates unnecessary work for other editors and reduces public opinion of Wikipedia. Dreamyshade (talk) 04:40, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:BEFORE requires a series of steps, including "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources." There are many additional sources available for this subject findable with a quick search in Google News and other resources.
 * The process also says "If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page" - I see that you commented on the talk page with your concern but only left three hours for responses before nominating the article for deletion. For most articles, three hours is not enough time for other editors to see and respond to a comment. I would recommend at least a couple of days for comments with a notability concern about a non-high-profile article.
 * In the deletion process itself, under step II you didn't include the prescribed template on the AfD page, which provides helpful context for the discussion. Another editor added it for you.
 * You didn't do step III of adding it to the Articles for Deletion log, which reduces the chances that people interested in deletion discussions can review the nomination. I added it here: Articles for deletion/Log/2019 April 27.