User talk:Unconditional-eternal love

Welcome!
Hello, Unconditional-eternal love, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 16:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 16:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lajja Gauri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''You will need to provide WP:reliable sources that back up the changes you are trying to make to this article. Simply making the same changes without addressing the reasons they were originally reverted will only see the changes reverted again. Per WP:BRD, instead of making the change again, you should use the Talk:Lajja Gauri page to argue why your version is better than the current version. Be prepared to back up those arguments with WP:reliable sources in order to convince other editors.'' noq (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Shri Vidya, you may be blocked from editing. ''Stop just repeating the same edits without providing a WP:reliable source. If this is all you intend to do, you may be blocked from editing.'' noq (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Shri Vidya. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

''You are now edit-warring and need to stop and read these warnings. Please revert your last edit to this article and follow the procedure at WP:BRD. If you continue to edit-war, then you will be blocked from editing.'' noq (talk) 17:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shri Vidya. noq (talk) 14:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shri Vidya. You have been blocked for this before - if you do it again, you will be blocked again - but for longer. noq (talk) 00:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ethnic religion, you may be blocked from editing. ''The cited source in the lede explicitly lists Islam and Christianity (and some forms of Buddhism) as examples of "universal religions". It explicitly lists Hinduism as an ethnic religion. '' FyzixFighter (talk) 12:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ethnic religion without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. noq (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Hinduism is completely universal world's religion Unconditional-eternal love (talk) 20:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

You have unjust if you aren't granted for my realistic edition. Unconditional-eternal love (talk) 20:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Please you grant my edition an example of universal religion is Hinduism & baha'i. Unconditional-eternal love (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Please you not change for page ethinic religion for an example universal religion gave Hinduism & baha'i. Unconditional-eternal love (talk) 20:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ethnic religion. ''You need to learn about what Wikipedia is - read the links in the Welcome section above. Changing cited material to match your opinion rather than what is being cited is not constructive - you need to provide a WP:reliable source rather than repeatedly push your own view. You have been blocked twice already, Continuing like you are will just get you blocked yet again.'' noq (talk) 21:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 04:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)