User talk:Unconventionally

Advertising
It appears from your edit history that you may be this account to promote the business Audacity on Wikipedia. Please be aware that single purpose accounts used for promoting businesses are strongly discouraged. Some guy (talk) 10:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * A press release is self-serving and is not a reliable source, even if it is mirrored by Reuters. Continued attempts to use press releases as sources may be deemed as bad faith edits. Some guy (talk) 04:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The link to the E3 Agency website directly violates WP:ELNO #13 and #19, despite your claims it satisfies all of the external link guidelines. We won't link to a podcast interview simply because it involves the CEO; it has to "contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject" per ELYES #3 and with nothing but that title it hardly seems relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the agency. Some guy (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * If I don't respond for a couple days, that doesn't mean I concede the article is notable and you can remove the notability tag. It means I haven't gotten around to responding yet, which could be for any number of reasons. I don't get paid to do this, so it's not always at the top of my priority list.
 * First, off, you can read the notability policy yourself. I understand Wikipedia is bloated with endless bureaucratic policies, but since you're so committed to this article I'm sure you can find the time to read them. Notability and Notability (organizations and companies) should be your main resources. To put it broadly, an article needs to show why a subject is notable enough to be covered in an encyclopedia, and I don't see that in your article.
 * Here is my opinion: you are an employee of or representative for an advertising company, trying to advertise for your advertising company on Wikipedia. As such, I am not particularly inclined to hold your hand through the editing process. Wikipedia is not the proper place for advertising. It is an encyclopedia built upon the concept of shared knowledge. Attempts to use it as a promotional venue are insulting and unwanted. My advice, before you go too much further, would be to think about what you are doing - how does it look when an advertising agency has to stoop to trying to promote themselves through Wikipedia? Is that a good sign that they are an effective organization? Some guy (talk) 22:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I have nominated the article for deletion here. Some guy (talk) 19:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)