User talk:Undead Library

Welcome!

 * }

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pearl and the Puppets has been reverted. Your edit here to Pearl and the Puppets was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://twitter.com/#!/pearlypops) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Your e-mail
've had a quick look, and will take a longer one, but probably not tonight. One thing to consider is that P&P had some pretty marginal news coverage, (see [|Afd, here]) and as Katie Sutherland has not yet released her album, it may be better to wait a while to see what kind of reception/success that gets. Ultimately, the encylopaedia does not need both articles; one should redirect to the other, with all relevant information correctly merged (it's a legal requirement) into one place, otherwise there'll just be two very skimpy articles. pablo 20:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC)