User talk:Underscore b

In Unison
A template has been added to the article In Unison, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Realkyhick 05:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of In Unison
In Unison, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that In Unison satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/In Unison and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of In Unison during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Realkyhick 06:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I think the decision to delete of In Unison was marginal, since there were similar numbers of delete and keep arguments in the debate. You may like to ask for a review of the decision at WP:DRV. Feel free to ask me if you need help doing this.- gadfium 19:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * A reminder that the result on AfD nominations frequently does not correlate to the pure numbers of votes in the discussion. If you do decide to go to deletion review, you should first discuss it with the admin that closed the AfD discussion, to find out what he or she thinks is needed to clear the article through DRV. You might also want to wait a while, as articles that were recently deleted via AfD are rarely revived through DRV soon after the AfD, unless there is a big change in circumstances (news event, etc.). - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:In Unison cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:In Unison cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: John Key revert
Sorry if I offended you with my edits. I have no knowledge of New Zealand politics, so I don't know what should or shouldn't go on the article. The edit showed up as vandalism on VandalFighter (or in better describing words: a major edit), and I reverted it. And don't feel "demoralised". If you want, be bold and add the info in. T he  C hronic  05:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)