User talk:Undertaker5000

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Stormbay (talk) 03:53, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of 2009 Virginia Tech Duke football game


The article 2009 Virginia Tech Duke football game has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non notable football game.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stormbay (talk) 03:53, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Removal of "Prod" tag
You should give a reason for the removal of this tag, either at the talk page or in your edit summary. Thanks! --Stormbay (talk) 15:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game
I have nominated 2009 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/2009 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 22:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:XX Per.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:XX Per.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 22:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Orthodox cross symbol.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Orthodox cross symbol.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of XX Persei


The article XX Persei has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Totally unreferenced, doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Democratic vs. Democratic-Republican Party
I just wanted to let you know that I agree with you that the Democratic Party is wholly distinct from the historical Democratic-Republican Party. Calidum is incorrect about the consensus. However, the article has persisted with this error for such a long time that we will need to discuss it on the article's talk page and achieve consensus in order to make this change. If you create a well-reasoned discussion on the talk page in support of this change, I will happily chime in with supporting arguments. TBSchemer (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

246 seats
Ah, you do appear correct that it is 246 seats, not 247; 247 is what got popularly reported. Thanks for explaining in the edit description. --7157.118.25a (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

September 2017
Your recent editing history at Hurricane Irma shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Wunderground does not update for Atlantic hurricane reanalysis. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Orthodox cross symbol.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Orthodox cross symbol.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
TonyBallioni (talk) 23:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Mélencron. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Left (Germany), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mélencron (talk) 23:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Duke. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rockypedia (talk) 00:15, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Well how about they prove that he's a white supremacist. He's never admitted to being one.

March 2018
Your recent editing history at James Allsup shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Every morning  (there's a halo...)  21:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

James Allsup
Please take your proposed changes to the talk page. You have already changed it three times without discussion on the talk page, despite my requests. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:18, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

The last edit was a compromise because I included identitarian which is very similar arguably to white suprememacists but they would probably consider themselves to be different. User:Undertaker5000, 21:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC) (talk)
 * Thank you but please take it to the talk page. I have already started a discussion there. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Please do not make edits like this without discussion on the talk page first. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:43, 8 April 2018 (UTC)