User talk:Underwearwedgie

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! - Jarry1250 (t, c) 13:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Debagg
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Debagg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary. You want Wiktionary.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 13:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Debagg
A tag has been placed on Debagg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rtphokie (talk) 13:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Briefs has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Rtphokie (talk) 13:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Debag
I speedily deleted your article Debagg for three reasons.


 * 1) It was misspelled. It's "debag", with a single "g".
 * 2) It was not referenced and appeared to be entirely original research
 * 3) It was a dictionary definition, and it is in Wiktionary as debag.

Several editors here have taken note of your edits, which should give you pause. Your username seems to indicate that you are here primarily to edit a single category of articles. While this is not a problem (many Wikipedia editors have an area in which they focus their efforts), all editors must keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a compendium of original ideas, opinions, or discussion.  Horologium  (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)