User talk:UndisputedKingOfEditors

February 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Master (2021 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Diff: Additionally, this edit was not vandalism, and should not been flagged as such. Poorly sourced content should not remain in the article, and Pinkvilla is not a reliable source. I'd recommend you read our reliable sourcing guidelines.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

In that case, The News Minute is also not reliable UndisputedKingOfEditors (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Re: this, if you resubmit this content again, I'll pull your editing privileges. Pinkvilla is not a reliable source. If you want to see a general list (not all-inclusive) of sources that are considered acceptable see WP:ICTFSOURCES. Nobody cares what your personal opinion is about what the Master gross is. We go by sources that the community has determined to be suitable. With your lack of experience editing here, you wouldn't know the totality of what those sources are. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Keep doing the PR. Change your name to PRbomb UndisputedKingOfEditors (talk) 22:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I didn't add the information, nor do I care one iota about Vijay. Additionally, personal attacks won't be tolerated at Wikipedia. If another reliable source has an opinion about the final gross that is lower than the 300, then absolutely it can be included. But Pinkvilla is not a reliable source for financial data. I explained all this on the talk page, which apparently you didn't bother to read after your edit-warring earlier. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

The News Minute is nowhere to be found on the list of reliable sources. It is not a newspaper, only a digital news portal. UndisputedKingOfEditors (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Did you happen to miss where I said "not all-inclusive"? We can't write down every source to satisfy you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok UndisputedKingOfEditors (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, what a surprise. Being condescending and pushing a POV and also a sockpuppet. Nice moral high horse you're on, amigo. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)