User talk:Undolie

October 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Mass–energy equivalence. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 15:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Incorrect!.
 * Because you don't understand the formula?.


 * Who is the "VANDAL"?.
 * You just delete what you don't know and say it is incorrect. But you can't say what the correct formula is.


 * Mass can't travel at the speed of light. Elements in there critical state do. Si is " CORRECT",
 * Let the physics do the maths. It is simple for them now with a unified solution that all parts have been solved.


 * You just going to delay the process with your vandalism.


 * Are you going to revert my edit so the proper peoles can confirm my "CORRECT" formula?.


 * Do you know what Si is?. and where in the world is the formula that calculates to C=Speedof light?. Remember that if E=MC, then what is MC if M=Mass?.


 * However Modulation + Ci = Energy and you can not disprove that, Even if you were smart enough to do the maths.


 * Thank you, Have a nice day.


 * Jason Evan Baldwin E=Mo Si. (Neutrinos).
 * And keep the Noble prize. The guys who got it this year just repeated what the same people got the prize for in 1995, but they did not discover anything new. With my formula we can move forward with this.


 * Listen, Jason, if you want to edit Wikipedia you must learn the policies and guidelines here. Most especially, the fact we must use reliable sourcing in order to insert new information into articles. Not your personal 'formulas'. Even if you are 'right', it doesn't matter. If you feel that you are too smart to discuss this with a dumb guy like me, use the article Talk pages to discuss your issues with other editors. Oh, and the Pending Changes statement on my User page has nothing to do with your edits. First, the articles that you edited were not under Pending Changes protection, and second, unsourced edits will always be removed from articles. Also, please learn how to indent your posts. Good luck! Dave Dial (talk) 13:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Derek Ross. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 06:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User:Derek Ross. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sjö (talk) 06:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Derek Ross. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   05:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz

Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)