User talk:Ungurul

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Balti steppe, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 12:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome! Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
 * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
 * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 12:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Thank you for blocking that disruptive editor. I know I reverted him, but I learned my lesson. Ungurul (talk) 13:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Being blocked on other wikis
Hi. I notice that you are reverting Moldopodo due to the fact he was blocked on fr.wiki. Unfortunately, a block on one wiki does not transfer to another - in fact, two English Wikiquote admins have been blocked from their native Wikipedias for varying offences. Will (talk) 18:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been Blocked for WP:HARASS. Repeatedly you have been warned and have chosen in pursuit of a certain point, to WP:HARASS User:Moldopodo. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.--Hu12 (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * You left a {test4} notice at User:Moldopodo, but he doesn't seem to have vandalized anything. It isn't vandalism to disagree with you, and using such templates makes you appear to be guilty of the trolling and harassment you are accusing him of.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Based on the feedback here, I've blocked you and for 14 days for continued disruption & edit warring. Upon the expiration of your respective blocks, anything more disrputive than serious good-faith efforts at dispute resolution will not be tolerated. &mdash; Scientizzle 21:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Thank you for blocking me and most of all that troll and vandal Moldopodo. At least I know I'm innocent and I will get unblocked by Theresa, when she will see on talk:Bălţi how Moldopodo avoid any consensus and was POV-pushing. And most important, do you think that such a troll will stop after 14 days? I doubt it and I wait to see him banned. Ungurul (talk) 21:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * You are nuts if you think I'm going to unblock you. I'm more likely to extend it to indefinate as you clearly lack the kills to edit a collaborative encylopedia. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You mean both of us?Ungurul (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No I mean you, why would I block him for your behaviour? Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Theresa, not me, 'you' the plural, you should block him for his behaviour that generated my reaction. I saved many other trolled articles. Otherwise you would have seen his invented POV everywhere. Have you seen his edits on talk:Bălţi or not? If you agree with his trolling style, I have nothing more to say. Ungurul (talk) 21:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * If you both return to name-calling, refusing to assume good faith of one another, accusations of vandalism when the other disagrees with you, and expecting Wikipedia's admins to referee your content dispute- and those are things you are both guilty of- I'd support an indef for both of you. Eventually, someone who is familiar with this area of study and is able to communicate what the best reliable sources say in clear, simple, polite English will come along to improve that article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Qeen, you would just wait and see Moldopodo in action again. I won't intervene however, two time blocked because of that POV-pushing jerk it's enough for me. But I hope, oh God to see the moment when the jerk is indef blocked because I feel it will come soon after. Ungurul (talk) 21:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMoldopodo&diff=181062811&oldid=181062104 at least he's history now. Anyway, he will come back with a different name, such a political agenda he had..

AfD nomination of Bălţi Plain
An editor has nominated Bălţi Plain, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)