User talk:UnheardConcept

Saint Diablo copyright problems
Greetings, I see that you have claimed on this article's website that the part of the article is copied with permission. However, the Wikipedia rules say that there are only 2 ways to give permission:
 * Place a note on the website that use under the GFDL license is permitted. The note at doesn't specify this.
 * Get a note sent to Wikipedia from an email identified with the copyright owner that they release this content under the GFDL.

See Requesting copyright permission for details. I hope this can be resolved soon! --Alvestrand 23:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. I hope to be a helpful contributor to Wikipedia and I apologize for breaking any specific rules. Unfortunately I'm not exactly understand what you need from the band. Do you need them to place something on their website stating that use of that information is allowed? Would they need to send you an email from their web domain? Any specific directions would be very helpful to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnheardConcept (talk • contribs)


 * Either would be adequate. In both cases, the magic words are "licensed for use under the GFDL". Have you checked out Requesting copyright permission? --Alvestrand 20:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Drr-darkomen (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

A quick query about your recent edits to the TUF9 Finale
Hi, I've just noticed your recent edits to the TUF9 Finale and am just wondering why you quoted the source that you did. It would appear that it doesn't really have anything to do with potential controversies surrounding judges decisions.

I have no problem whatsoever with edits stating that some were potentially controversial, but am just confused, as I say, as to the choice of source for the statement. Is there any way you could find a better source? Thanks Paralympiakos (talk) 22:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry. I did a quick copy/paste to get the correct form for the reference and forgot to rename the source. I've fixed it now. UnheardConcept (talk)

Nomination of Hector Ramirez (fighter) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hector Ramirez (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hector Ramirez (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 11:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)