User talk:Unicornofengland

February 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Samantha Sepulveda has been reverted. Your edit here to Samantha Sepulveda was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/SamSep177) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Samantha Sepulveda have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Samantha Sepulveda was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/SamSep177) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

A heads-up
Uh-oh. We all need to watch out that we don't lapse from the WP:3RR rule. Geo Swan (talk) 01:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * can we refrain from mentioning the department please?
 * I hope so. I said so at Talk:Samantha_Sepulveda.  I reverted the guy who keeps adding that, twice.  There is a wikipedia rule, anyone who reverts something three time, within 24 hours, is lapsing from the 3 revisions rule.


 * So, I would be in trouble if I reverted it again, today.


 * I reminded misclejones of the 3rr rule. I checked, they are a new contributor too, like you.  They have made a couple of dozen edits.  Most to the Samantha Sepulveda article, but also some to Nassau County Police Department and Freeport Police Department.


 * I wonder if they might be from Freeport? I used the email feature to send you an email, about the images you added.


 * If you are a friend of Ms Sepulveda's I'll help you any way I can, so long as I still comply with the wikipedia's policies.


 * Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 01:41, 11 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes I am a friend of Samantha's. I appreciate the time you took in order to create this for her. I wasn't sure who kept adding Freeport and I know it is inevitable. I will check the email shortly. I am currently on my way out. Any help from you would be greatly appreciated! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by unicornofengland (talk • contribs)


 * My pleasure. Geo Swan (talk) 12:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WIKISAM.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:WIKISAM.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://instafamosos.ig.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/s2.jpg&imgrefurl=https://instafamosos.ig.com.br/conheca-samantha-sepulveda-eleita-a-policial-mais-sensual-de-ny/&h=748&w=640&tbnid=8NkiYWWyw1l1UM&tbnh=243&tbnw=208&usg=AI4_-kQz1_nc8KRmH_EmH1YJ301L-u-8AA&vet=1&docid=lMMscTIBNcm-eM&hl=sv. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)