User talk:Unified star

Welcome
 <div style="background-color: Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~) ; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.  Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)   Hello, Unified star, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting started
 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Finding your way around
 * Table of contents
 * Directories and indexes
 * Department directory
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Editing articles
 * How to develop an article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting help
 * Frequently asked questions
 * Cheatsheet
 * Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
 * The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
 * Help pages
 * Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How you can help
 * Community Portal
 * Join a WikiProject
 * Follow Wikipedia etiquette
 * Practice civility
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surendra Bahadur Hamal has been accepted
 Surendra Bahadur Hamal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Surendra_Bahadur_Hamal help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 split in the Nepalese communist parties has been accepted
 2021 split in the Nepalese communist parties, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=2021_split_in_the_Nepalese_communist_parties help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 12:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Mr. Bada Kaji Unified star (talk) 12:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request!
Even if I have made a mistake, please help me correct it. I love making articles on current political issues as I am a online journalist. I padon for any mistake made but request for an unblock. Unified star (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

What is the problem?
@Usedtobecool, I am not a sock poppet! Brother, contribute productively and let others contribute as well. I am totally positive. Were my edits destructive? Were they? You feel your profile is secret here but till when? Your conflict of interest is evident. I had made some productive changes and had published notable articles! I found written someone curious....'s sock! Who's that persona? How come you prove that I am his sock? I am not! In certain areas, people's interest match. This doesn't mean they are same. I saw their IP. It's from Kathmandu and Vianet communications. I am a computer engineering student. I know those tools. Please investigate. With a clean mind, please revive my articles which have been deleted else I will take actions and it won't be any good for you if I will prove. Do correct and let others correct! Last time, You are not doing any good.Unified star (talk) 04:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

See this edit of mine., and see this. His and my edits are totally different. I don't see any sports related edit from that person. See mine!,. I am also a part-time online sports journalist. Please I request you to revert whatever happened due to you! Keep in mind this is not a warning. And even if it is, you deserve getting warned for accepting only your dirty part of mind. Unified star (talk) 04:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

You found me editing related to Nepali Congress, right! Do you read any newspaper, listen to radio or watch a TV? Isn't the news full of NC? Can you deny this? Who writes the news? Me? There are thousands of journalists, bloggers and intelligent people who write about Nepali Congress, their ministers, MPs and MLAs daily. Only you are dirty minded. If I am not unblocked, I will bring whole of this matter out. I saw written things of my talk page reverted but note even it gets reverted, I get evidence anyday I like. Do accordingly! Please be positive and think productive. Do correct and let others do correct.Unified star (talk) 04:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@Fade258, Bada Kaji, KylieTastic you three had helped me publish and improve my articles which has been deleted now. Please help proving me correct. Weren't those articles productive/notable?This person named cool is having one sided revenge with me.Unified star (talk) 04:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I know many of your edits are good, maybe even most. That is why I've never reverted your edits blindly. That is why I tried to help you. That is why I helped you to get unblocked; I even offered to mentor you. But you never had any intention of making any effort to fix your weaknesses, did you? And they are a deal breaker.You made more than 200 edits and half a dozen articles while I was away for less than two days. Obviously, I can't check all your edits to see if they are neutral or just promoting your favourite leaders of your favourite party, or worse attacking rivals. I thought I might offer you advice on a potential way back into the community when I got your ping, but reading the above, the gist I take from it is that I should fear for my safety if there were even a small chance I slipped up about my real-world identity in my 25,000 edits over 3 years. Seeing as this is a community project for the believers of the sanctity of knowledge and definitely not one of ignorant goons of corrupt political organisations, I don't think there is a way for you to be accepted back here anytime soon. So long! Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * There is always the standard offer. You have clearly shown that you are capable of writing good articles. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 10:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)