User talk:Unionhawk/Archive 3

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps update
Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 90% done with only 226 articles remain to be swept! As always, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. With over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 4 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. As an added incentive, if we complete over 100 articles reviewed this month, I will donate $100 to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps participants. I hope that this incentive will help to increase our motivation for completing Sweeps while supporting Wikipedia in the process. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Happy New Year
I thought that I would take the time to say that I hope that you have a Happy New Year to you and your family Unionhawk!-- Literature geek |  T@1k?  01:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q4 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Please provide a valid reason for participating in the edit warring. If you had taken the time you would see that the vandalism was targetted at a single website and not meant to be a "link cleanup". Past history would show that the website being vandalised was targetted by a spam site many times in the past. Your edits are not appreciated by the FL community. 69.17.98.100 (talk) 17:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please check out Don't template the regulars. Re-reading ELNO, two of the links I removed should actually be included. I have restored those two. Also, please check out AGF. I shouldn't need to explain that my removal of a few too many links is good faith editing.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 17:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

What?
Why warn me for 3RR when all I did was revert vandalism? The other user User:66.65.9.220 was removing content! Please remove my warning. **UPDATE** the user again removed content under a false reason and I can do nothing about it. Thanks!FLobotomy (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The content removal in question was the removal of a link, and, personally, I agree with him. Links to tutorials are not wanted per WP:ELNO, so, I'm going to do some link cleanup. (the article in question is FL Studio).--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 15:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * On the surface I can see why you think that way since you are ignorant to the value of said links. The link was a) useful, b) accesible, c) relevant, d) not affiliate spam. As a matter of fact it meets almost all criteria in WP:ELNO to the letter. As did the other sites that remained. You have no idea of the history of the vandalism done to the page in the past including the replacing of warbeats.com by users working for some affiliate spam sites like musicproducerpro.net. Warbeats is widely known as a valuable resource for FL Studio information and resources and thus a target for such vandals. You have harmed the FL Studio community. The original vandalism was not done properly with a reason. All proper steps to warn the user by multiple users was taken. All protocol was followed to the letter to resolve the situation per wikipedia rules. You pretty much ignored that or perhaps was too lazy to care. But I'll leave it where it stands since you the one with the power to do what YOU feel is right, and I'm just a nobody who tried to be a good wikipedian and follow the rules. FLobotomy (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You know, there's this awesome little thing called Ignore all rules. I feel that I was improving the 'pedia without the bureaucratic bullshit, so, by IAR, nothing that I did was improper. The removal of a link like that would be a content dispute, and an ongoing one at that, apparently.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 18:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * To your credit you admit ignoring wikipedia rules in your actions. The problem is you did not take any time to investigate what was going on. Some of us have to follow rules. We aren't special like you. And when we take the time to follow those rules and play by the book, it sucks to have someone like you come by and just blast everyone instead of investigating. Here's a little advice, you will probably ignore, when you have two pearties in a dispute and one party tries to follow all protocol and the other shits on protocol, side with the one that follows protocol. FLobotomy (talk) 23:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No, you're not listening. One of the rules says to ignore a rule if you think it gets in the way of improving Wikipedia (see WP:IAR). I thought some rules got in my way of improving Wikipedia, so, I just ignored them and defaulted to improvement.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 01:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Community de-Adminship - finalization poll for the CDA proposal
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.

A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;


 * gather opinion on the 'consensus margin' (what percentages, if any, have the most support) and


 * ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community. Matt Lewis (talk) 01:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Completed!
Thanks to everyone's amazing efforts in February, we have reviewed all of the articles and are now finished with Sweeps! There are still about 30 articles currently on hold, and once those reviews are completed, I will send you a final message about Sweeps process stats including the total number of articles that were passed and failed. If you have one of these open reviews, be sure to update your count when the review is completed so I can compile the stats. You can except to receive your award for reviewing within the next week or two. Although the majority of the editors did not start Sweeps at the beginning in August 2007 (myself included), over 50 editors have all come together to complete a monumental task and improve many articles in the process. I commend you for sticking with this often challenging task and strengthening the integrity of the GA WikiProject as well as the GAs themselves. I invite you to take a break from reviewing (don't want you to burn out!) and then consider returning/starting to review GANs and/or contribute to GAR reviews. With your assistance, we can help bring the backlog down to a manageable level and help inspire more editors to improve articles to higher classes and consider reviewing themselves. Again, thank you for putting up with difficult reviews, unhappy editors, numerous spam messages from me, and taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

RfC on Community de-adminship
You are receiving this message because you contributed to Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC and have not participated at Community de-adminship/RfC or been directly informed this RfC has opened. Please accept my apologies if you have been informed of and/or participated in the RfC already.

This RfC has opened and your comments are welcome and encouraged. Please visit Community de-adminship/RfC. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:53, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

A sincere thank you from Wikiproject Good Articles
On behalf of Wikiproject Good Articles, I would like to express our gratitude to you for your contributions to the Sweeps process. Completion of this monstrous task has proven to be a significant accomplishment not only for our project, but for Wikipedia. As a token of our sincere appreciation, please accept this ribbon. Lara 01:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  17:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Peer review for RuneScape
I'm aware you're not very active on Wikipedia anymore, but you may be interested in the latest peer review I have submitted for RuneScape, since I'm not sure where to go with the article. If you wish, please take a few moments to comment. Your feedback would be appreciated. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

My Name
I suggest you please take a break if you are confused or upset. When you return, be nice, no need to back negative comments about me in your edit summary. I am trying to do a good job here. If I make a mistake, please tell me and I will fix it pronto. I am really trying to make a small improvement here. I hope you enjoy the Wikipedia as much as I have today. I think it is neat that I can help make things better. 21:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 22:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Archives
Are you sure you want your archives protected? I've done 2 or 3. If you do, just say and I'll do the rest, if not, I'll unprotect them or semi them, whatever floats your boat. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   01:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I was literally just putting up the request with the full list, and checking to make sure nobody tampered with the archives when I got this message... (because I'm paranoid like that). Worst case scenario is ClueBot attempts to file an archive incorrectly (maybe thinks it's 2009, I don't know), and it still shows up on the history anyway. Anyway, I'm not going to edit them anymore, and I hope ClueBot isn't going to do anything with them, so go ahead and full protect them all.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 01:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If that's what you want. ✅. Let me know if you want 'em unprotected for any reason (or if you want future archives protected). Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   02:05, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

your RfA
Hi there Unionhawk. I'm sorry to see that there's some problems at your RfA because of some immaturity concerns; you seem like a generally good candidate otherwise. I think you should take the rest of the concerns raised to heart and wait for yourself to mature on your own time. You will at some point make a good candidate, don't worry. ;)  ceran  thor
 * Yeah, yeah. I had completely forgotten about that edit summary. Would you mind closing it as withdrawn? I sent the 'crats an e-mail a couple of hours ago, but, there hasn't been any response...--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 00:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This whole incident reminds me of something... what was it... oh yeah, it was when pretty much the same thing happened to me (I also note you supported me anyway while others were tripping over themselves trying to switch to oppose). Don't lose hope, because you can always get another chance and if you take on board the criticisms and remember that even one freakin edit summary that is the slightest bit uncivil is enough to get a lot of RFA regulars to oppose you, you too could receive the golden turd uh I mean vast honor that is adminship on Wikipedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I intend to go for it again. A few months (probably 6, to satisfy the RfA regulars), less biting, more activeness, and you can count on my name being back up there for another go.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 01:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you got some very solid support this go-round, things will probably go better next time. - Dank (push to talk) 03:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've been off travelling and didn't even notice. Let me know next time.  - Hordaland (talk) 07:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * There were no problems with your RfA Unionhawk, just better researched opposes than supports and they  discovered a couple of chinks in  your armour that  the vultures all  went  for. It's also not  easy to expect younger people to have accumulated sufficient  subject  knowledge to create lots of new articles about  serious topics. This doesn't  exclude the fact  that  there might  be a couple of topics that  you  are already highly  knowledgeable about and could significantly  contribute to. I'm sure there is a wealth  of advice in  your RfA for you  to  work  on too. Remember, your selfnom  was made in  good faith and was a very brave thing to do,  and so  was your decision  to  withdraw. These things have gained you respect, and I look forward to  being on  the support side the next  time round. --Kudpung (talk) 09:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * All right, that's enough moral support. I'm not discouraged, not depressed, and I've finished flogging myself with a wet trout for those stupid edit summaries. I'll wait a bit, fix my errors, and try again. You can count on that.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 12:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Excuse me Kudpung? A vulture? :) Anyways, Unionhawk, There was nothing wrong with your contributions, in my opinion, and I originally supported. That edit summary... Well... It just shocked me that someone would do that, and it was only nine days before. Anyways, my point is that your edits are fine, and I think that you will do much better next time, and I no doubt will !vote support. Hi878 (talk) 23:08, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your support at my RfA
Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 17:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Question..
I noticed that someone is promoting products by deleting The Ubie. This Promotional deleting is rather serious. The Vaporizer is about a type ofproduct that is much safer than smoking. The Ubie is a patented technology that allows amokers to 'vaporizer with a lighter' it is the only product of it's kind. There appears to be a well orchestrated effort to delete The Ubie from the vaporizer page in order to sell disguised bootleg ripoffs of the technology. it's a great strategy.. damages google rating and everything. But is it apropriate for wikipedia to be releasing it's encycolpedia missing the most important technology in smoking? 72.94.245.65 (talk) 22:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC) Info@TheUbie.Com

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 September 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 September 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:18, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)