User talk:Unionhawk/Archives/2009/March

Tabs
Making the user page tabs is actually quite easy, and it only requires some links in boxes. You could have just checked how I made my page (edit it), but I'll make it easy for you. Just edit the following part with your own pages (as if you were writing links) and place it at the top of your page:

PS: Forgive the lateness of my reply. I would be more than happy to do the tabs for you if you like. Dogcowsaysmoof (talk) 21:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I already did the tabs for you, saving you a couple of minutes of precious time! I hope you like them, if you want anything else added to the tabs, just tell me! DogcowsaysmoofTalkGuestbookBarnstar GallerySandbox 02:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Random1
You're very random. I mainly made a wikipedia page in Biology because I was bored. I think I'll go write a Knol now. oh, oops. yea, --AlexSeibz (talk) 02:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Wow, thanks. That was very surprising but also very pleasing. Thank you. Peanut4 (talk) 21:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Your welcome. Random kindness=ftw!!!--Unionhawk (talk) 22:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Random2
Thanks for being a special person and we should go to the mall sometime.--AlexSeibz (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Techno Art We need to update this site and our google group. Google= ftw--AlexSeibz (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

hi there
Feel free to check out my userpage and my link on videogames. If you have any question you can ask me. I think the only person you know is Xenocidic so let me help you a little. {| width="100%" style="background:transparent" {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#" Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~) ; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!-- Spittle spat! ǀ  T  ♦  C  ♦  S  18:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)  |} {| width="100%" style="background-color:#" Hope this helps!-- Spittle spat! ǀ  T  ♦  C  ♦  S  18:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * style="width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top"|
 *  Hello Unionhawk, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
 * style="width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top"|

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron


I notice some of your templates on your user page, and I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever to Wikipedia, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron!
Thank you for taking the time to join Unionhawk, I look forward to working with you in the future. Ikip (talk) 22:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

My edits in the WAGA personalities article
I'm sorry, but I was helping directly pointing wikilinks since it showed "(Redirected from)". --99.158.136.26 (talk) 02:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah... You should seriously make an account...--Unionhawk (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to ARS!
{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; " align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron!
 * colspan="2" |

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!

Gate River Run
Unionhawk, welcome to Wikipedia. Since you are relatively new, you may not be aware that if you revert edits to an article, you should add an explanation in the edit summary. According to Vandalism,

"The edit summary is important in that it helps other editors understand the purpose to your edit. Though use of it is not required, it is strongly recommended, even for some minor edits, and is considered proper Wikipedia etiquette."

Even better is to make an entry on the article's talk page and on the contributor's talk page. If the reason for removing a contribution is not obvious to everyone, reverting could be construed as vandalism. I await your response. Mgreason (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm... you have a very good point. I guess I should be going for quality, not quantity.--Unionhawk (talk) 15:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Moeller HS
Thanks for your edits to Moeller HS. Could you add a more reliable source to your addition to the laptop section on Moeller HS? As it stands now it seems like a veiled attempt to advertise a product. -- Lucas20 (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * hmm... you may be right. As it stands now, only that case study and the computer policies sheet mention it. Not very notable... Perfectly verifiable, but not really needed--Unionhawk (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Moron trivia
Hi Hawk, hope you don't mind, but I've declined your speedy on Moron trivia and instead directed it to a section. What do you think of this alternative?  Were Spiel Chequers  19:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That works.--Unionhawk (talk) 20:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Ohio!
 Hi, and welcome to the WikiProject Ohio! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio.

A few features of the project that you might find helpful:


 * The open task box is updated frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including Ohiotasks on your user page.
 * All important discussions take place on our project's main discussion page; you can also [ watch] this page to keep up with discussions.
 * The project has some departments, which handle article quality assessment, newsletter writing, and new page patrolling.
 * We also have a taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at which can be found at WP:OHTWP.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or any other member of the project, we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! §hep Talk  22:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mark Burger
A tag has been placed on Mark Burger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Radiant chains (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Let the record show that this deletion request was withdrawn, and the article improved.--Unionhawk (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK
Hi Unionhawk, thanks for your interest in contributing to WP:Did you know! I just wanted to let you know that this article that you rejected for being too old actually does meet our criteria; DYK accepts not only articles created within the past five days, but articles expanded more than fivefold within the past five days (the reasoning is that an article expanded this much is basically a new article). This article was expanded from a single sentence to several paragraphs within the last couple days, so it qualifies. For more information, you can look at the DYK rules or Art LaPella's unofficial guide to DYK. Best, rʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 17:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh... Thanks for the clarification...--Unionhawk (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)