User talk:Uniqbasu

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prof. Kulamani Parida (November 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Prof. Kulamani Parida may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Uniqbasu Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curbon7&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Uniqbasu reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for your message and welcome to Wikipedia. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. You said ''I have created this page regarding my guide Prof. Kulamani Parida... The web page with which it shows copyright issues were also created by us. Please restore the page and we will do''. Who is "we" and "us"?

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. Please don't write about yourself, which is clearly what you are doing, eg ''in recognition of my lifetime Research contributions... In recognition of my significant contribution in Physical Sciences...of my significant contributions to research in chemistry. ''. Please also read the guidance below:


 * When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.


 * Your refs included lists of his own publications, his self-written biography, and interviews with him, none of those are independent third-party sources. Also much of your text was completely unreferenced


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * Writing your article in bold italics looks promotional, please use standard grammar. Self-praise includes in depth research... developed challenging... facile methods... which are very active and selective... He has contributed significantly on... he could able [sic] to make CSIR-IMMT internationally recognizable... The important and current relevance of his work is amply reflected in the large number of citations of his work 


 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * We do not restore copyright violations for legal reasons

Also, you are Indian and based in India, so not sure why you are using American English spelling like "Center" instead of Indian English.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Prof. Kulamani Parida moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Prof. Kulamani Parida, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Prof. Kulamani Parida moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Prof. Kulamani Parida, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 06:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Prof. Kulamani Parida


A tag has been placed on Draft:Prof. Kulamani Parida, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Pahunkat (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)