User talk:Unique2tell

Unique2tell, you are invited to the Teahouse
[[Category:It seems Niemti is a bit of a troublemaker at Wikipedia. I've read some of the material on: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, and I must say, this person Niemti should be reprimanded, at least. I have the right, as anyone else does to add informative facts to an article deemed to be historical fact. Niemti (it seems) prefers to see history as Niemti sees it, and omits truth.]]

Read this
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007178

For starters. --Niemti (talk) 03:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

The article's now protected against vandalism. Consider it a warning. --Niemti (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

As you refused to stop
There's a thread about you at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, have a nice day. --Niemti (talk) 20:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Warning
Your edits on Warsaw Uprising have been tendentious and disruptive. You need to stop trying to push Wikipedia's coverage into the direction of your preferred agenda.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued tendentious revert-warring immediately after by warning above.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

HotCat
It's curious that you appear to be using HotCat without your own knowledge. It's a tool for adding categories, not making edits. Airplaneman  ✈  20:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I can assure you, I did not use any such program, nor do I know of it, I am self-taught on the computer! I went in to "edit", and did so. On another note, I feel all of my unblock requests have not been read as being together, it seems each one is separately reviewed, and judged, I thought I just would add the information requested, and the Administrator would go over all of them? Maybe someone will be willing enough to make the historically inaccurate article more concise as I have tried to do? There is plenty of evidence out there that shows I was only clarifying a couple of certain points so there wouldn't be a mis-understanding, or mis-interpretation of history. Now there is clearly a twist in the historical data under "Belligerents" which will lead many to think that those Nations did willingly, what was done by Nazi created "Puppet Governments"! The truth will prevail!99.141.190.62 (talk) 04:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Here is just one example of what should be qualifying "citation" directly stating they were Puppet Governments:http://defendinghistory.com/tag/lithuanian-provisional-governmentUnique2tell (talk) 04:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Some points:
 * First of all, the reviewing administrators for your blocks have clearly taken the time to fully acquaint themselves with the situation, as evidenced by their declining rationale rife with examples and context to support their reasoning.
 * Secondly, the link you cite certainly does not qualify as a reliable or neutral source. Looking at the site's editor alone, Dovid Katz, raises red flags.
 * Third, I'm not sure how HotCat is making its way into your edits if you're simply editing via the edit button. Example. Try going to Preferences --> Gadgets --> Editing and unchecking the box next to "HotCat, easily add / remove / change a category on a page, with name suggestion". See if that helps. Airplaneman   ✈  05:57, 29 January 2013 (UTC)